Sub-Contractor Is Liable to Pay Service Tax Even if Main Contractor is Exempt | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

Service tax exemption for sub-contractors
Case Details: Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi East v. Navnirman Construction Company (2025) 26 CENTAX 415 (Tri.-Del.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Dr Rachna Gupta, Member (J) & Ms Hemambika R. Priya, Member (T)
  • Shri Anand Narayan, Authorized Representative, for the Appellant.
  • Shri Kamal Gupta, Chartered Accountant, for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The assessee was engaged in providing construction services to private companies. During the audit of the main contractor, it was revealed that the assessee received various services through contractors/sub-contractors service providers. Later, the main contractor did not charge service tax on the bills against those services provided. The assessee charged the main contractor without charging any service tax. The department contended that the assessee was not liable to pay service tax on the construction services provided to the main contractor as the main contractor was exempt from paying service tax on the same services. The matter reached the CESTAT.

CESTAT Held

The Tribunal held that the services provided by the assessee were not provided to the Government but to a private company. The construction was meant for profit/revenue generation and not predominantly for non-commercial use. The exemption available to the Government services would not be available to the sub-contractor providing services to a private contractor, even if the main contractor is exempt and the final service recipient is the Government.

List of Cases Cited

List of Departmental Clarification Cited

List of Notifications Cited

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
Texturising Polyester Yarn from PET Chips Not Manufacture of Filament Yarn | SC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

November 4, 2025

Spice Mix Adding Flavour and Aroma Classifiable as Spices Under Tariff 0910 91 00 SC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

November 1, 2025

Refund on Abated Value Denied Without Challenging Self-Assessment | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

October 31, 2025

Refund Must Be Granted as No Stay on Judgment Excluding Trade Discounts From Turnover | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

October 30, 2025

Delay Beyond Condonable Limit for Fixation of Special Rate Not Excusable | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

October 29, 2025

HC Quashes SCN for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Pre-Consultation

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

October 16, 2025

SC Upholds Tax on Ink Used in Printing Lottery Tickets

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

October 15, 2025

Packing or Labeling of Earthmoving Machines Not Manufacture | SC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

October 14, 2025

Subscription and Entrance Fees from Members Not Liable to Service Tax | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

October 13, 2025

Independent Appeal Against ROM Order Dismissed Only Final Tribunal Order Appealable | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

October 9, 2025