Sub-Contractor Is Liable to Pay Service Tax Even if Main Contractor is Exempt | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

Service tax exemption for sub-contractors
Case Details: Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi East v. Navnirman Construction Company (2025) 26 CENTAX 415 (Tri.-Del.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Dr Rachna Gupta, Member (J) & Ms Hemambika R. Priya, Member (T)
  • Shri Anand Narayan, Authorized Representative, for the Appellant.
  • Shri Kamal Gupta, Chartered Accountant, for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The assessee was engaged in providing construction services to private companies. During the audit of the main contractor, it was revealed that the assessee received various services through contractors/sub-contractors service providers. Later, the main contractor did not charge service tax on the bills against those services provided. The assessee charged the main contractor without charging any service tax. The department contended that the assessee was not liable to pay service tax on the construction services provided to the main contractor as the main contractor was exempt from paying service tax on the same services. The matter reached the CESTAT.

CESTAT Held

The Tribunal held that the services provided by the assessee were not provided to the Government but to a private company. The construction was meant for profit/revenue generation and not predominantly for non-commercial use. The exemption available to the Government services would not be available to the sub-contractor providing services to a private contractor, even if the main contractor is exempt and the final service recipient is the Government.

List of Cases Cited

List of Departmental Clarification Cited

List of Notifications Cited

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
Rebate Authority Can’t Review Assessment | Gujarat HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

July 17, 2025

Refund of Service Tax Paid by Mistake on Exempted Services Allowed With 12% Interest | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

July 16, 2025

HC Validates Pre-Deposit Payment via Electronic Cash Ledger

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

July 15, 2025

HC Grants Stay on Service Tax Demand Upon 5% Deposit

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

July 15, 2025

SC Upholds 90% Abatement for Online Travel Firm as Tour Operator

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

July 11, 2025

Service Tax Demand Can’t Be Based Solely on 26AS–ST-3 Mismatch | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

July 10, 2025

Massage and Hair Oils with Alcohol Not Excisable | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

July 9, 2025

HC Grants Time for Pre-Deposit | Revives VAT Appeal

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

July 8, 2025

No Remand Needed for Accepted and Paid Tax Demand | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

July 4, 2025

Writ Not Maintainable in Brand Income Tax Dispute | SC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

July 3, 2025