SCN for Revocation of Customs Broker’s License Issued After 90 Days Was Not Time Barred as Limitation Under Regulation 17 is Directory | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

Customs broker SCN limitation
Case Details: Cargo Care International Versus Commissioner of Customs, Cochin (2025) 27 Centax 445 (Tri.-Bang)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Dr. D.M. Misra, Member (J) & Mrs R. Bhagya Devi, Member (T)
  • Shri Baby M.A. Adv., for the Appellant.
  • Shri K. Vishwanatha, Superintendent (AR), for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The appellant, a licensed Customs broker, challenged the validity of a show cause notice (SCN) dated 13-09-2022 issued by the Commissioner of Customs, proposing revocation of the license and imposition of penalties. The offence report was dated 23-03-2022 and was claimed to have been received by the Commissioner on 01-09-2022. The appellant contended that the offence report had already led to a suspension of the license on 25-03-2022, indicating prior knowledge by the Commissioner. Citing Regulation 17 of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 (CBLR, 2018), the appellant asserted that the SCN, issued beyond 90 days from the receipt of the offence report, was time-barred.

CESTAT Held

The Hon’ble Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the limitation under Regulation 17 of CBLR, 2018, is directory and not mandatory. Relying on the Karnataka High Court’s ruling in Commissioner v. Sri Manjunatha Cargo Pvt. Ltd. [C.S.T.A. No. 10 of 2020, decided on 12-01-2022], the Tribunal reaffirmed that an SCN issued after 90 days from the receipt of the offence report cannot be considered invalid solely on the ground of limitation. The Tribunal dismissed the appellant’s challenge and upheld the validity of the SCN.

List of Cases Cited

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
PVC Resin SP 660 Suspension Grade Classifiable Under CTH 3904 21 10 | SC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

December 12, 2025

HC Denies Bail in Customs Fraud Causing Major Revenue Loss

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

December 11, 2025

EOU Not Eligible for Duty-Free Import on Capital Goods Moved to DTA

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

December 10, 2025

Govt. Extends CVD on Textured Tempered Glass Imports from Malaysia

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

December 9, 2025

Deptt. Can’t Appeal Before CESTAT Against Orders Passed Under Regulation 19 of CBLR 2018 | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

December 8, 2025

Lithium-Ion Battery Recognised as Distinct Product Concessional Duty Exemption Upheld | SC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

December 6, 2025

CESTAT Allows Customs Exemption for Power Project Imports on Ratified Certificate

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

December 5, 2025

FSSAI Norms Don’t Apply to Export Goods Unless FTP Specifies | SC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

December 4, 2025

HC Grants Bail as Co-Accused’s Custodial Confession Inadmissible Under Evidence Act

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

December 3, 2025

Gold Bangles Diverted Before Export Loading Liable for Confiscation | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

December 2, 2025