Extended Period of Limitation Cannot Be Invoked as Assessee Had Bona Fide Belief That Service Tax Was Not Payable on Services

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

Extended Limitation Period
Case Details: Maheshwari Builders V. Commissioner of CE & CGST, Lucknow (2025) 29 CENTAX 72 (TRI.-ALL)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • S/Shri P.K. Choudhary, Member (J) & Anil G. Shakkarwar, Member (T)
  • Shri Vineet Kumar Singh, Adv., for the Appellant.
  • Shri Santosh Kumar, Authorized Representative, for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The assessee received amounts for services that were either covered by the negative list or eligible for exemption. Based on this, the assessee believed that service tax was not payable. However, the department alleged suppression of facts as the differential turnover was not declared in ST-3 returns. The issue before the Allahabad Tribunal was whether the extended period of limitation could be invoked by the department as the assessee had a bona fide belief that service tax was not payable on services covered by the negative list or eligible for exemption.

CESTAT Held

The Tribunal noted that the services were either covered by the negative list or exempt under Notification No. 25/2012-ST, as amended. Despite the adjudicating authority acknowledging this, the demands were confirmed without proper evaluation. The Tribunal held that relying solely on Form 26AS without assessing exemptions or verifying service nature was insufficient. It was held that the assessee’s belief was genuine and supported by precedent. Therefore, the extended limitation period was not applicable, and the demand was unsustainable. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside.

List of Cases Cited

List of Notifications Cited

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
SC Dismisses Appeal, Upholds HC Order Limiting Cenvat Credit Use

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

September 17, 2025

Maintenance Reimbursements Not Part of Renting Service | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

September 12, 2025

Construction Agreements With Landowners Are Works Contract | SC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

September 12, 2025

Market Support Services to Foreign Entity Treated as Export: CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

September 10, 2025

Lease of Land for Port and Marine Activities Attracts Service Tax | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

September 8, 2025

Services to Foreign Client for Market Promotion Qualify as Export | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

September 5, 2025

Installing Software With COA Stickers Is Sale—Not Service | SC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

September 5, 2025

SC Rules Freight Collected by Agents Not Taxable

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

August 30, 2025

Service Tax Demand Invalid When Trade Discounts Passed On | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

August 28, 2025

CGST Officers Can Pursue Pending Service Tax Matters | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

August 22, 2025