CESTAT | Govt.-approved vocational courses exempt from Service Tax

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

CESTAT ruling vocational education exemption Service Tax exemption NCVT-approved courses Skill Development Initiative Notification 25/2012-ST
Case Details: Raiganj Computer and Information Technology Versus Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Kolkata (2025) 32 Centax 442 (Tri.-Cal) 

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Shri K. Anpazhakan, Member (T)
  • Smt. Shreya Mundhra, Advo., for the Appellant.
  • Shri S.K. Jha, Authorized Representative, for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The appellant was engaged in providing National Council for Vocational Training (NCVT)-approved Modular Employable Skill (MES) courses under the Skill Development Initiative (SDI) Scheme of the Government of India. It was stated that these courses were designed under the said scheme and that the services rendered were covered under Sl. No. 9A of Notification No. 25/2012-S.T., dated 20-06-2012, which exempts vocational education courses offered by Government institutions or local authorities. The appellant contended that the courses provided were specifically exempt from levy of Service Tax in terms of the said notification. The matter was accordingly placed before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). 

CESTAT Held

The CESTAT held that the NCVT-approved MES courses provided by the appellant under the SDI Scheme of the Government of India were specifically exempt from levy of Service Tax by virtue of Sl. No. 9A of Notification No. 25/2012-S.T., dated 20-06-2012. It was observed that the services in question were covered within the scope of vocational education/training/skill development courses offered by Government institutions or local authorities. The appeal was allowed, and the demand for Service Tax was set aside. 

List Of Case Cited

 

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
FA 2010 Service Tax Levy on Construction Upheld | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 31, 2026

Tobacco Products Assessable Under Section 4, Not 4A | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 28, 2026

Clandestine Removal Demand Set Aside For Lack Of Proof | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 27, 2026

No Review on Interest/Penalty If Duty Set Aside | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 24, 2026

Duty Demand Set Aside; Review Of Interest Penalty Invalid | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 23, 2026

Booking Speakers Via Agents Not Event Management | SC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 22, 2026

RCM Service Tax Refund Allowed Despite Registration Status | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 21, 2026

One-Day Delayed Payment Due To Tech Glitch Accepted | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 20, 2026

Chocolate-Coated Wafers Eligible For Concessional Duty | SC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 19, 2026

Adjudication Invalid After SVLDRS Acceptance | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 17, 2026