SC Rules Export Cargo Handling by AAI Attracts Service Tax

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

SC ruling on service tax for export cargo handling
Case Details: Airports Authority of India vs. Commissioner of Service Tax (2025) 34 Centax 387 (S.C.)  

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Pankaj Mithal & Prasanna B. Varale, JJ.
  • S/Shri Y. K. Kapur, learned counsel, Bhushan Kapur, Advs. and Amrendra Kumar Mehta, AOR, for the Appellant
  • Shri Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR, for the Respondent

Facts of the Case

Airports Authority of India (AAI), a Govt. body under Ministry of Civil Aviation, manages airports and handles cargo (including export cargo). The activities include unloading, carting, X-ray, packing, etc. from acceptance to placement on aircraft.  Service Tax Department demanded tax for 01.10.2003–31.03.2007: as “Storage & Warehousing Services” up to 09.09.2004. As “Airport Services” from 10.09.2004 onwards (after insertion of Section 65(105)(zzm)). However, AAI argued that “handling of export cargo” is specifically excluded from “cargo handling service” under Section 65(23) of the Finance Act, 1994 and hence not taxable. 

 Supreme Court Held

The Supreme Court held that the Airport Authority’s handling of export cargo was taxable under the category of airport services with effect from 10-09-2004.The definition of the taxable service is very wide and takes into its fold any kind of service that may be provided to any person by the Airport Authority in any airport. Accordingly, all kinds of services rendered by the Airport Authority in any airport are taxable services and are chargeable to service tax under Section 66 of the Act. 

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
FA 2010 Service Tax Levy on Construction Upheld | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 31, 2026

Tobacco Products Assessable Under Section 4, Not 4A | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 28, 2026

Clandestine Removal Demand Set Aside For Lack Of Proof | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 27, 2026

No Review on Interest/Penalty If Duty Set Aside | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 24, 2026

Duty Demand Set Aside; Review Of Interest Penalty Invalid | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 23, 2026

Booking Speakers Via Agents Not Event Management | SC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 22, 2026

RCM Service Tax Refund Allowed Despite Registration Status | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 21, 2026

One-Day Delayed Payment Due To Tech Glitch Accepted | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 20, 2026

Chocolate-Coated Wafers Eligible For Concessional Duty | SC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 19, 2026

Adjudication Invalid After SVLDRS Acceptance | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 17, 2026