GST on Dry Lease of Aircraft Classified Under HSN 9973 at 5%

GST • News • Case Chronicles

GST on Dry Lease of Aircraft
Case Details: In re : Agneet Sky Aviation (IFSC) Pvt. Ltd. (2025) 36 Centax 87 (A.A.R. - GST - Guj.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Vishal Malani, Member (Central Tax) & Sushma Vora, Member (State Tax)
  • Shri Dhaval Shah, for the Applicant.

Facts of the Case

The applicant, a SEZ unit, entered into a dry lease agreement for helicopters without an operator, transferring exclusive possession, operational control, and full liability to the lessee, who managed all crew, maintenance, insurance, and operational costs. The agreement covered delivery of the helicopter with engines, accessories, and records, and contained no clause permitting the lessor to retake possession during the lease term. The applicant sought classification of the service under Heading 9973 and applicability of Sl. No. 17(iii) of Notification No. 11/2017-CT (Rate), Dated 28-06-2017. The matter was accordingly placed before the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR).

AAR Held

The AAR held that Heading 9973 explicitly covers leasing or rental services without an operator. It was observed that explanatory notes aligned with the United Nations Central Product Classification (UNCPC) place aircraft leasing without operator within transport equipment services, mapped to SAC 997311. The aircraft or helicopter qualifies as goods being movable property within the GST scheme, and the agreement establishes transfer of right to use goods to the exclusion of the lessor while imposing full operational liabilities on the lessee, with no clause permitting re-transfer during the term. Consequently, dry leasing is classifiable under Heading 9973 and falls under Sl. No. 17(iii) of Notification No. 11/2017-CT (Rate), Dated 28-06-2017.

List of Cases Cited

List of Notifications Cited

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
Parallel CGST and Customs Action Not Double Jeopardy | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

December 15, 2025

Ex Parte GST Demand After Rectification Violates Natural Justice – Fresh Adjudication Ordered | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

December 12, 2025

Transporter Not Liable When Goods Released to Consignor | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

December 11, 2025

Flow Meter Maintenance Not Part of Composite Supply of Recycled Water | AAR

GST • News • Case Chronicles

December 11, 2025

HC Sets Aside Garnishee Order When Appeal Pre-Deposit Made

GST • News • Case Chronicles

December 10, 2025

GST Exemption Allowed for Residential Property Used as Hostel | SC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

December 9, 2025

GST Registration to Be Auto-Suspended for Missing Bank Details Under Rule 10A | GSTN Advisory

GST • News • Statutory Scope

December 8, 2025

GSTN Issues Additional FAQs for Annual Return Reporting for FY 2024-25

GST • News • Statutory Scope

December 6, 2025

GST Registration Cancellation Upheld for Fake Rent Documents and No Business | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

December 5, 2025

Demand Order Invalid If It Exceeds Amount Stated in SCN | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

December 4, 2025