{"id":2738,"date":"2025-02-22T17:42:38","date_gmt":"2025-02-22T12:12:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/centaxblogs.taxmann.com\/?p=2738"},"modified":"2025-02-22T17:42:38","modified_gmt":"2025-02-22T12:12:38","slug":"reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods","title":{"rendered":"Reversal of Credit Proportionate to Exempted Goods Justified as Assessee Had Used Common Inputs for Exempted &#038; Dutiable Goods"},"content":{"rendered":"<pre><strong>Case Details:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/latest-news-updates\/excise-service-tax\/101010000000386183\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods\">Commissioner of CGST &amp; Central Excise, Bolpur Versus Jai Balaji Industries (Unit-III)- (2025) 26 Centax 371 (Tri.-Cal)<\/a><\/pre>\n<h2><em>Judiciary and Counsel Details<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>S\/Shri R. Muralidhar<\/strong>, Member (J) &amp; <strong>Rajeev Tandon<\/strong>, Member (T)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Shri S. Debnath<\/strong>, Authorized Representative, for the Appellant.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Mrs Shreya Mundhra<\/strong>, Adv. &amp;<strong> Shri S. Mohapatra<\/strong>, G.M. (Taxation), for the Respondent.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><em>Facts of the Case<\/em><\/h2>\n<p>The appellant, a manufacturer of Ductile Iron Pipes (DI Pipes) under Chapters 72 and 73 of the Central Excise Tariff, was found to have availed Cenvat credit on common inputs used for both dutiable and exempted goods. Following an audit, the department issued a show-cause notice demanding 5%\/6% of the value of the exempted goods, alleging improper claiming of Cenvat credit. The appellant had already reversed a proportionate amount of the Cenvat credit before the notice was issued, though not adhering to the procedural requirements under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The case was brought before the Kolkata Tribunal for adjudication.<\/p>\n<h2><em>CESTAT Held<\/em><\/h2>\n<p>The Honourable Tribunal, after carefully examining the submissions and evidence presented, held that while the appellant did not strictly adhere to the procedural requirements under Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, the reversal of Cenvat credit, which was done proportionately for the exempted goods, was substantively valid. The Tribunal acknowledged that the appellant had reversed the credit before the issuance of the show-cause notice and emphasized that the failure to follow procedural formalities should not hinder the benefit of proportionate reversal. Consequently, the Tribunal found that the department\u2019s demand for 5%\/6% of the value of the exempted goods was not legally sustainable, as the reversal was sufficient to meet the legal requirements.<\/p>\n<h2><em>List of Cases Cited<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2016%20(43)%20S.T.R.%20411%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Aster Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2016 (43) S.T.R. 411 (Tribunal)\u2014 Noted [Para 7]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2017%20(352)%20E.L.T.%2086%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Jai Balaji Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2017 (352) E.L.T. 86 (Tribunal) \u2014 Noted [Paras 2, 4, 6]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2015%20(40)%20S.T.R.%20381%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Mercedes Benz India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2015 (40) S.T.R. 381 (Tribunal) \u2014 Referred [Para 4]<\/li>\n<li>Pepsico Holdings by Madras High Court &#8211; Noted [Para 7]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Case Details: Commissioner of CGST &amp; Central Excise, Bolpur Versus Jai Balaji&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":2742,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[49,51,63],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2738","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-excise-service-tax","category-news-excise-service-tax","category-est-case-chronicles"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Reversal of Credit Proportionate to Exempted Goods Justified as Assessee Had Used Common Inputs for Exempted &amp; Dutiable Goods<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"CESTAT ruled that proportionate reversal of Cenvat credit is valid, despite non-compliance with procedural requirements under Rule 6(3), rejecting the department&#039;s demand for 5%\/6% of exempted goods&#039; value.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Reversal of Credit Proportionate to Exempted Goods Justified as Assessee Had Used Common Inputs for Exempted &amp; Dutiable Goods\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"CESTAT ruled that proportionate reversal of Cenvat credit is valid, despite non-compliance with procedural requirements under Rule 6(3), rejecting the department&#039;s demand for 5%\/6% of exempted goods&#039; value.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Centax-Blogs\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-02-22T12:12:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/13.-Reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods-copy.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"540\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/8377c5d00cc2d7084efc03a923ead0f9\"},\"headline\":\"Reversal of Credit Proportionate to Exempted Goods Justified as Assessee Had Used Common Inputs for Exempted &#038; Dutiable Goods\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-02-22T12:12:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods\"},\"wordCount\":321,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/13.-Reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods-copy.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Excise &amp; Service Tax\",\"News\",\"Case Chronicles\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods\",\"name\":\"Reversal of Credit Proportionate to Exempted Goods Justified as Assessee Had Used Common Inputs for Exempted & Dutiable Goods\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/13.-Reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods-copy.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-02-22T12:12:38+00:00\",\"description\":\"CESTAT ruled that proportionate reversal of Cenvat credit is valid, despite non-compliance with procedural requirements under Rule 6(3), rejecting the department's demand for 5%\/6% of exempted goods' value.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/13.-Reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods-copy.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/13.-Reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods-copy.jpg\",\"width\":920,\"height\":540,\"caption\":\"Cenvat Credit Reversal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Reversal of Credit Proportionate to Exempted Goods Justified as Assessee Had Used Common Inputs for Exempted &#038; Dutiable Goods\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Centax-Blogs\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Centax-Blogs\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp\",\"width\":536,\"height\":133,\"caption\":\"Centax-Blogs\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/8377c5d00cc2d7084efc03a923ead0f9\",\"name\":\"Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0393b9f8f1f37627caf2a36b8204c7a0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0393b9f8f1f37627caf2a36b8204c7a0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/author\/secure_admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Reversal of Credit Proportionate to Exempted Goods Justified as Assessee Had Used Common Inputs for Exempted & Dutiable Goods","description":"CESTAT ruled that proportionate reversal of Cenvat credit is valid, despite non-compliance with procedural requirements under Rule 6(3), rejecting the department's demand for 5%\/6% of exempted goods' value.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Reversal of Credit Proportionate to Exempted Goods Justified as Assessee Had Used Common Inputs for Exempted & Dutiable Goods","og_description":"CESTAT ruled that proportionate reversal of Cenvat credit is valid, despite non-compliance with procedural requirements under Rule 6(3), rejecting the department's demand for 5%\/6% of exempted goods' value.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods","og_site_name":"Centax-Blogs","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia","article_published_time":"2025-02-22T12:12:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":920,"height":540,"url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/13.-Reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods-copy.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods"},"author":{"name":"Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/8377c5d00cc2d7084efc03a923ead0f9"},"headline":"Reversal of Credit Proportionate to Exempted Goods Justified as Assessee Had Used Common Inputs for Exempted &#038; Dutiable Goods","datePublished":"2025-02-22T12:12:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods"},"wordCount":321,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/13.-Reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods-copy.jpg","articleSection":["Excise &amp; Service Tax","News","Case Chronicles"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods","name":"Reversal of Credit Proportionate to Exempted Goods Justified as Assessee Had Used Common Inputs for Exempted & Dutiable Goods","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/13.-Reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods-copy.jpg","datePublished":"2025-02-22T12:12:38+00:00","description":"CESTAT ruled that proportionate reversal of Cenvat credit is valid, despite non-compliance with procedural requirements under Rule 6(3), rejecting the department's demand for 5%\/6% of exempted goods' value.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/13.-Reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods-copy.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/13.-Reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods-copy.jpg","width":920,"height":540,"caption":"Cenvat Credit Reversal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/reversal-of-credit-proportionate-to-exempted-goods-justified-as-assessee-had-used-common-inputs-for-exempted-dutiable-goods#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Reversal of Credit Proportionate to Exempted Goods Justified as Assessee Had Used Common Inputs for Exempted &#038; Dutiable Goods"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/","name":"Centax-Blogs","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Centax-Blogs","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp","width":536,"height":133,"caption":"Centax-Blogs"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/8377c5d00cc2d7084efc03a923ead0f9","name":"Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0393b9f8f1f37627caf2a36b8204c7a0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0393b9f8f1f37627caf2a36b8204c7a0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Admin"},"url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/author\/secure_admin"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2738","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2738"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2738\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2741,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2738\/revisions\/2741"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2742"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2738"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2738"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2738"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}