{"id":2786,"date":"2025-02-27T09:40:23","date_gmt":"2025-02-27T04:10:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/centaxblogs.taxmann.com\/?p=2786"},"modified":"2025-02-27T09:42:59","modified_gmt":"2025-02-27T04:12:59","slug":"personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed","title":{"rendered":"Personal Jewellery is Not Subject to Monetary Limit Under Baggage Rules; Confiscation Order to Be Quashed"},"content":{"rendered":"<pre><strong>Case Details:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/latest-news-updates\/customs\/101010000000388687\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed\">Saba Simran Versus Union of India (2025) 27 Centax 34 (Del.)<\/a><\/pre>\n<h2><em>Judiciary and Counsel Details<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Yashwant Varma<\/strong> &amp; <strong>Ravinder Dudeja<\/strong>, JJ.<\/li>\n<li><strong>S\/Shri Vishal Tiwari<\/strong> &amp; <strong>Kumari Nidhi Tripathi<\/strong>, Advs., for the Petitioner.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Ms Pratima N. Lakra<\/strong>, CGSC with <strong>Shri Chandan Prajapati<\/strong>, Adv., for the Respondent.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><em>Facts of the Case<\/em><\/h2>\n<p>The petitioner, a film actress, travelled from Bengaluru to Dubai for a film shoot. Upon her return to India, she opted for the green channel at the airport. However, after crossing the channel, a Customs Officer intercepted her and recovered three gold bangles and fifteen gold beads from her baggage. These items were detained via a Detention Receipt. Subsequently, an Order-in-Original was issued, denying the petitioner the benefit of &#8216;Free Allowance&#8217; under the Baggage Rules, 2016. The order further directed absolute confiscation of the detained gold jewellery and imposed a penalty on the petitioner. Aggrieved by this decision, the petitioner filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court, arguing that her personal jewellery, being pre-owned and used, should not be classified as imported goods and subjected to the monetary restrictions of the Baggage Rules, 2016.<\/p>\n<h2><em>High Court Held<\/em><\/h2>\n<p>The Hon\u2019ble High Court held that personal jewellery already in possession of a passenger before travel does not constitute an &#8220;import.&#8221; The Court emphasized that the quantitative restrictions under Rules 3 and 4 of the 2016 Rules apply only to articles acquired abroad with the intent to import, not to personal effects carried for daily use. It clarified that &#8220;personal effects&#8221; include jewellery and ornaments if they were already owned by the passenger before travel. Aligning its interpretation with previous baggage regulations and CBEC Circular No. 72\/98-Cus., which explicitly recognized personal jewellery as part of &#8220;personal effects,&#8221; the Court set aside the adjudication order and directed the authorities to reconsider the matter in light of these legal principles.<\/p>\n<h2><em>List of Cases Cited<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2017%20(353)%20E.L.T.%20129%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Directorate of Revenue Intelligence v. Pushpa Lekhumal Tolani<\/a> \u2014 2017 (353) E.L.T. 129 (S.C.) \u2014 Followed [Para 18]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2008%20(227)%20E.L.T.%20368%20(Del.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Pushpa Lakhumal Tulani v. Addl. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2008 (227) E.L.T. 368 (Del.) \u2014 Relied on [Para 17]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2014%20(308)%20E.L.T.%20394%20(Ker.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Vigneswaran Sethuraman v. Union of India<\/a> \u2014 2014 (308) E.L.T. 394 (Ker.) \u2014 Relied on [Para 19]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><em>List of Departmental Clarification Cited<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=Circular%20No.%2072%2F98-Cus.&amp;itemType=AP\">C.B.E. &amp; C. Circular No. 72\/98-Cus.<\/a>, dated 24-9-1998 [Para 10]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Case Details: Saba Simran Versus Union of India (2025) 27 Centax 34&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":2788,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[38,177,47],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2786","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-customs","category-customs-news","category-custom-case-chronicles"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Personal Jewellery is Not Subject to Monetary Limit Under Baggage Rules; Confiscation Order to Be Quashed<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Delhi High Court ruled that pre-owned personal jewellery does not constitute &quot;import&quot; under the Baggage Rules, 2016, setting aside the confiscation order and directing reconsideration.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Personal Jewellery is Not Subject to Monetary Limit Under Baggage Rules; Confiscation Order to Be Quashed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Delhi High Court ruled that pre-owned personal jewellery does not constitute &quot;import&quot; under the Baggage Rules, 2016, setting aside the confiscation order and directing reconsideration.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Centax-Blogs\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-02-27T04:10:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-02-27T04:12:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/9.-Personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-Baggage-Rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"450\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/8377c5d00cc2d7084efc03a923ead0f9\"},\"headline\":\"Personal Jewellery is Not Subject to Monetary Limit Under Baggage Rules; Confiscation Order to Be Quashed\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-02-27T04:10:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-02-27T04:12:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed\"},\"wordCount\":370,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/9.-Personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-Baggage-Rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Customs\",\"News\",\"Case Chronicles\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed\",\"name\":\"Personal Jewellery is Not Subject to Monetary Limit Under Baggage Rules; Confiscation Order to Be Quashed\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/9.-Personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-Baggage-Rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-02-27T04:10:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-02-27T04:12:59+00:00\",\"description\":\"The Delhi High Court ruled that pre-owned personal jewellery does not constitute \\\"import\\\" under the Baggage Rules, 2016, setting aside the confiscation order and directing reconsideration.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/9.-Personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-Baggage-Rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/9.-Personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-Baggage-Rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed.jpg\",\"width\":920,\"height\":450,\"caption\":\"Pre-owned jewellery exemption\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Personal Jewellery is Not Subject to Monetary Limit Under Baggage Rules; Confiscation Order to Be Quashed\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Centax-Blogs\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Centax-Blogs\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp\",\"width\":536,\"height\":133,\"caption\":\"Centax-Blogs\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/8377c5d00cc2d7084efc03a923ead0f9\",\"name\":\"Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0393b9f8f1f37627caf2a36b8204c7a0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0393b9f8f1f37627caf2a36b8204c7a0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/author\/secure_admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Personal Jewellery is Not Subject to Monetary Limit Under Baggage Rules; Confiscation Order to Be Quashed","description":"The Delhi High Court ruled that pre-owned personal jewellery does not constitute \"import\" under the Baggage Rules, 2016, setting aside the confiscation order and directing reconsideration.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Personal Jewellery is Not Subject to Monetary Limit Under Baggage Rules; Confiscation Order to Be Quashed","og_description":"The Delhi High Court ruled that pre-owned personal jewellery does not constitute \"import\" under the Baggage Rules, 2016, setting aside the confiscation order and directing reconsideration.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed","og_site_name":"Centax-Blogs","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia","article_published_time":"2025-02-27T04:10:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-02-27T04:12:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":920,"height":450,"url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/9.-Personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-Baggage-Rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed"},"author":{"name":"Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/8377c5d00cc2d7084efc03a923ead0f9"},"headline":"Personal Jewellery is Not Subject to Monetary Limit Under Baggage Rules; Confiscation Order to Be Quashed","datePublished":"2025-02-27T04:10:23+00:00","dateModified":"2025-02-27T04:12:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed"},"wordCount":370,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/9.-Personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-Baggage-Rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed.jpg","articleSection":["Customs","News","Case Chronicles"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed","name":"Personal Jewellery is Not Subject to Monetary Limit Under Baggage Rules; Confiscation Order to Be Quashed","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/9.-Personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-Baggage-Rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed.jpg","datePublished":"2025-02-27T04:10:23+00:00","dateModified":"2025-02-27T04:12:59+00:00","description":"The Delhi High Court ruled that pre-owned personal jewellery does not constitute \"import\" under the Baggage Rules, 2016, setting aside the confiscation order and directing reconsideration.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/9.-Personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-Baggage-Rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/9.-Personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-Baggage-Rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed.jpg","width":920,"height":450,"caption":"Pre-owned jewellery exemption"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/personal-jewellery-is-not-subject-to-monetary-limit-under-baggage-rules-confiscation-order-to-be-quashed#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Personal Jewellery is Not Subject to Monetary Limit Under Baggage Rules; Confiscation Order to Be Quashed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/","name":"Centax-Blogs","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Centax-Blogs","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp","width":536,"height":133,"caption":"Centax-Blogs"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/8377c5d00cc2d7084efc03a923ead0f9","name":"Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0393b9f8f1f37627caf2a36b8204c7a0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0393b9f8f1f37627caf2a36b8204c7a0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Admin"},"url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/author\/secure_admin"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2786","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2786"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2786\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2789,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2786\/revisions\/2789"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2788"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2786"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2786"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2786"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}