{"id":3331,"date":"2025-04-06T17:44:43","date_gmt":"2025-04-06T12:14:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/centaxblogs.taxmann.com\/?p=3331"},"modified":"2025-04-06T17:44:43","modified_gmt":"2025-04-06T12:14:43","slug":"scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat","title":{"rendered":"SCN for Revocation of Customs Broker\u2019s License Issued After 90 Days Was Not Time Barred as Limitation Under Regulation 17 is Direc..."},"content":{"rendered":"<pre><strong>Case Details:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/latest-news-updates\/customs\/101010000000390919\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat\">Cargo Care International Versus Commissioner of Customs, Cochin (2025) 27 Centax 445 (Tri.-Bang)<\/a><\/pre>\n<h2><em>Judiciary and Counsel Details<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Dr. D.M. Misra, Member (J)<\/strong> &amp; <strong>Mrs R. Bhagya Devi<\/strong>, Member (T)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Shri Baby M.A.<\/strong> Adv., for the Appellant.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Shri K. Vishwanatha<\/strong>, Superintendent (AR), for the Respondent.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><em>Facts of the Case<\/em><\/h2>\n<p>The appellant, a licensed Customs broker, challenged the validity of a show cause notice (SCN) dated 13-09-2022 issued by the Commissioner of Customs, proposing revocation of the license and imposition of penalties. The offence report was dated 23-03-2022 and was claimed to have been received by the Commissioner on 01-09-2022. The appellant contended that the offence report had already led to a suspension of the license on 25-03-2022, indicating prior knowledge by the Commissioner. Citing Regulation 17 of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 (CBLR, 2018), the appellant asserted that the SCN, issued beyond 90 days from the receipt of the offence report, was time-barred.<\/p>\n<h2><em>CESTAT Held<\/em><\/h2>\n<p>The Hon\u2019ble Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the limitation under Regulation 17 of CBLR, 2018, is directory and not mandatory. Relying on the Karnataka High Court\u2019s ruling in Commissioner v. Sri Manjunatha Cargo Pvt. Ltd. [C.S.T.A. No. 10 of 2020, decided on 12-01-2022], the Tribunal reaffirmed that an SCN issued after 90 days from the receipt of the offence report cannot be considered invalid solely on the ground of limitation. The Tribunal dismissed the appellant\u2019s challenge and upheld the validity of the SCN.<\/p>\n<h2><em>List of Cases Cited<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2024%20(390)%20E.L.T.%2067%20(Tri.%20-%20Bang.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Cargo Care International v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2024 (390) E.L.T. 67 (Tri. &#8211; Bang.) = (2024) 20 Centax 2 (Tri. &#8211; Bang.) \u2014 Referred [Para 4]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=(2022)%201%20Centax%20297%20(Cal.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Commissioner v. S. Pandey &amp; Company<\/a> \u2014 (2022) 1 Centax 297 (Cal.) \u2014 Referred [Para 4]<\/li>\n<li>Commissioner v. Sri Manjunatha Cargo Pvt. Ltd. \u2014 C.S.T.A. No. 10 of 2020, decided on 12-1-2022 by Karnataka High Court \u2014 Followed [Paras 5, 5.1]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2023%20(384)%20E.L.T.%20436%20(Tri.%20-%20Ahmd.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Essar Power Gujarat Ltd. v. C.C., Jamnagar (Prev.)<\/a> \u2014 2023 (384) E.L.T. 436 (Tri. &#8211; Ahmd.) = (2023) 4 Centax 142 (Tri. &#8211; Ahmd.) \u2014 Referred [Para 3.1]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2015%20(323)%20E.L.T.%20377%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Manjit Singh v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2015 (323) E.L.T. 377 (Tribunal) \u2014 Referred [Para 3.1]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2016%20(332)%20E.L.T.%20300%20(Mad.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Masterstroke Freight Forwarders Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2016 (332) E.L.T. 300 (Mad.) \u2014Referred [Para 3.1]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2016%20(340)%20E.L.T.%20119%20(Del.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Overseas Air Cargo Services v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2016 (340) E.L.T. 119 (Del.) \u2014 Referred [Para 3.1]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2022%20(380)%20E.L.T.%20544%20(Cal.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Welcome Air Express Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2022 (380) E.L.T. 544 (Cal.) \u2014 Referred [Para 4]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Case Details: Cargo Care International Versus Commissioner of Customs, Cochin (2025) 27&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":3337,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[38,177,47],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3331","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-customs","category-customs-news","category-custom-case-chronicles"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SCN for Revocation of Customs Broker\u2019s License Issued After 90 Days Was Not Time Barred as Limitation Under Regulation 17 is Directory | CESTAT<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"CESTAT upheld the validity of the SCN issued to a Customs broker, ruling that the 90-day timeline under CBLR, 2018 is directory, not mandatory.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SCN for Revocation of Customs Broker\u2019s License Issued After 90 Days Was Not Time Barred as Limitation Under Regulation 17 is Directory | CESTAT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"CESTAT upheld the validity of the SCN issued to a Customs broker, ruling that the 90-day timeline under CBLR, 2018 is directory, not mandatory.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Centax-Blogs\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-04-06T12:14:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/3.-SCN-for-revocation-of-Customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-Regulation-17-is-directory-CESTAT.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"750\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/8377c5d00cc2d7084efc03a923ead0f9\"},\"headline\":\"SCN for Revocation of Customs Broker\u2019s License Issued After 90 Days Was Not Time Barred as Limitation Under Regulation 17 is Direc...\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-06T12:14:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat\"},\"wordCount\":379,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/3.-SCN-for-revocation-of-Customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-Regulation-17-is-directory-CESTAT.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Customs\",\"News\",\"Case Chronicles\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat\",\"name\":\"SCN for Revocation of Customs Broker\u2019s License Issued After 90 Days Was Not Time Barred as Limitation Under Regulation 17 is Directory | CESTAT\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/3.-SCN-for-revocation-of-Customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-Regulation-17-is-directory-CESTAT.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-06T12:14:43+00:00\",\"description\":\"CESTAT upheld the validity of the SCN issued to a Customs broker, ruling that the 90-day timeline under CBLR, 2018 is directory, not mandatory.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/3.-SCN-for-revocation-of-Customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-Regulation-17-is-directory-CESTAT.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/3.-SCN-for-revocation-of-Customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-Regulation-17-is-directory-CESTAT.jpg\",\"width\":750,\"height\":500,\"caption\":\"Customs broker SCN limitation\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SCN for Revocation of Customs Broker\u2019s License Issued After 90 Days Was Not Time Barred as Limitation Under Regulation 17 is Direc...\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Centax-Blogs\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Centax-Blogs\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp\",\"width\":536,\"height\":133,\"caption\":\"Centax-Blogs\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/8377c5d00cc2d7084efc03a923ead0f9\",\"name\":\"Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0393b9f8f1f37627caf2a36b8204c7a0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0393b9f8f1f37627caf2a36b8204c7a0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Admin\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/author\/secure_admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SCN for Revocation of Customs Broker\u2019s License Issued After 90 Days Was Not Time Barred as Limitation Under Regulation 17 is Directory | CESTAT","description":"CESTAT upheld the validity of the SCN issued to a Customs broker, ruling that the 90-day timeline under CBLR, 2018 is directory, not mandatory.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SCN for Revocation of Customs Broker\u2019s License Issued After 90 Days Was Not Time Barred as Limitation Under Regulation 17 is Directory | CESTAT","og_description":"CESTAT upheld the validity of the SCN issued to a Customs broker, ruling that the 90-day timeline under CBLR, 2018 is directory, not mandatory.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat","og_site_name":"Centax-Blogs","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia","article_published_time":"2025-04-06T12:14:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":750,"height":500,"url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/3.-SCN-for-revocation-of-Customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-Regulation-17-is-directory-CESTAT.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat"},"author":{"name":"Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/8377c5d00cc2d7084efc03a923ead0f9"},"headline":"SCN for Revocation of Customs Broker\u2019s License Issued After 90 Days Was Not Time Barred as Limitation Under Regulation 17 is Direc...","datePublished":"2025-04-06T12:14:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat"},"wordCount":379,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/3.-SCN-for-revocation-of-Customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-Regulation-17-is-directory-CESTAT.jpg","articleSection":["Customs","News","Case Chronicles"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat","name":"SCN for Revocation of Customs Broker\u2019s License Issued After 90 Days Was Not Time Barred as Limitation Under Regulation 17 is Directory | CESTAT","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/3.-SCN-for-revocation-of-Customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-Regulation-17-is-directory-CESTAT.jpg","datePublished":"2025-04-06T12:14:43+00:00","description":"CESTAT upheld the validity of the SCN issued to a Customs broker, ruling that the 90-day timeline under CBLR, 2018 is directory, not mandatory.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/3.-SCN-for-revocation-of-Customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-Regulation-17-is-directory-CESTAT.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/3.-SCN-for-revocation-of-Customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-Regulation-17-is-directory-CESTAT.jpg","width":750,"height":500,"caption":"Customs broker SCN limitation"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/scn-for-revocation-of-customs-brokers-license-issued-after-90-days-was-not-time-barred-as-limitation-under-regulation-17-is-directory-cestat#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SCN for Revocation of Customs Broker\u2019s License Issued After 90 Days Was Not Time Barred as Limitation Under Regulation 17 is Direc..."}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/","name":"Centax-Blogs","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Centax-Blogs","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp","width":536,"height":133,"caption":"Centax-Blogs"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/8377c5d00cc2d7084efc03a923ead0f9","name":"Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0393b9f8f1f37627caf2a36b8204c7a0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0393b9f8f1f37627caf2a36b8204c7a0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Admin"},"url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/author\/secure_admin"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3331","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3331"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3331\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3335,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3331\/revisions\/3335"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3337"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3331"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3331"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3331"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}