{"id":3662,"date":"2025-05-05T12:03:56","date_gmt":"2025-05-05T06:33:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?p=3662"},"modified":"2025-05-05T12:03:56","modified_gmt":"2025-05-05T06:33:56","slug":"no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc","title":{"rendered":"No Interference Needed as Assessee Ignored SCN &#038; Hearings | HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<pre><strong>Case Details: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/latest-news-updates\/excise-service-tax\/101010000000391806\/order-does-not-require-any-interference-as-assessee-failed-to-avail-opportunity-to-submit-a-reply-to-scn-hc\">Ramnath Prasad Versus Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Patna (2025) 29 Centax 306 (Pat.)<\/a><\/strong><\/pre>\n<h2><em>Judiciary and Counsel Details<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Rajeev Ranjan Prasad<\/strong> &amp; <strong>Ramesh Chand Malviya<\/strong>, JJ.<\/li>\n<li><strong>S\/Shri D.V. Pathy<\/strong>, Sr. Adv., <strong>Sadashiv Tiwari, Ms Prachi Pallavi, Hiresh Karan, Ms Shivani Dewalla<\/strong>, Advs., for the Petitioner.<\/li>\n<li><strong>S\/Shri Dr. Krishna Nandan Singh<\/strong>, Sr. Adv. (ASG), <strong>Anshuman Singh<\/strong>, Sr. SC, CGST &amp; CX, <strong>Shivaditya Dhari Sinha, Adv. Amarjeet<\/strong>, Adv., for the Respondent.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><em>Facts of the Case<\/em><\/h2>\n<p>The petitioner, engaged in the business of transporting foodgrains under a government contract, was subjected to proceedings under the Finance Act, 1994 after the Department received information from the Income Tax Department indicating receipt of substantial amounts for taxable services. Based on this, the Department issued letters and emails asking the petitioner to provide documents and explanations. As there was no response, a show cause notice was issued, giving the petitioner the opportunity to submit a reply. The petitioner did not file any response to the notice. During adjudication, the Department gave multiple opportunities for personal hearing. The petitioner appeared once and requested more time but failed to submit any written reply or documents thereafter. Since the petitioner did not participate further, the Department passed impugned order confirming service tax liability, interest, and penalty. The petitioner challenged the order before the Patna High Court, alleging denial of natural justice.<\/p>\n<h2><em>High Court Held<\/em><\/h2>\n<p>The Hon\u2019ble Patna High Court held that the order passed by the Department did not warrant interference, as the petitioner was given ample opportunity to reply and to participate in the proceedings but failed to do so. It observed that the principles of natural justice were followed in adjudication stages, and the petitioner\u2019s non-participation could not be used to invalidate the order. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed.<\/p>\n<h2><em>List of Cases Cited<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Rochem Separation Systems (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India \u2014 Writ Petition No. 822 of 2021 by Bombay High Court \u2014 Referred [Para 6]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2019%20(25)%20G.S.T.L.%20486%20(Del.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Amadeus India Pvt. Ltd. v. Principal Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2019 (25) G.S.T.L. 486 (Del.) \u2014 Referred [Para 6]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2020%20(32)%20G.S.T.L.%20J121%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Principal Commissioner v. Amadeus India Pvt. Ltd.<\/a> \u2014 2020 (32) G.S.T.L. J121 (S.C.) \u2014 Referred [Para 6]<\/li>\n<li>Kanak Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India \u2014 CWJC No. 18398 of 2023, decided on 4-4-2024 by Patna High Court \u2014 Referred [Paras 11, 20, 23]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2022%20(61)%20G.S.T.L.%20129%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Commissioner v. Northern Operating Systems Pvt. Ltd.<\/a> \u2014 2022 (61) G.S.T.L. 129 (S.C.) \u2014 Relied [Paras 12, 27]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=1995%20(75)%20E.L.T.%20721%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Cosmic Dye Chemical v. Collector<\/a> \u2014 1995 (75) E.L.T. 721 (S.C.) \u2014 Referred [Para 12]<\/li>\n<li>Suo Moto Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 by Patna High Court \u2014 Referred [Para 20]<\/li>\n<li>Mangal Murti Constructions v. Union of India \u2014 CWJC No. 4541 of 2024 by Patna High Court \u2014 Relied [Paras 21, 37]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2023%20(384)%20E.L.T.%208%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Godrej Sara Lee Ltd. v. Excise and Taxation Officer-Cum-Assessing Authority<\/a> \u2014 2023 (384) E.L.T. 8 (S.C.) = (2023) 3 Centax 49 (S.C.) \u2014 Referred [Para 21]<\/li>\n<li>Shalini Shyam Shetty v. Rajendra Shankar Patil \u2014 (2010) 8 SCC 329 \u2014 [Para 21]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2012%20(283)%20E.L.T.%20161%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Commissioner v. Fiat India Pvt. Ltd.<\/a> \u2014 2012 (283) E.L.T. 161 (S.C.) \u2014 [Para 31]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><em>List of Departmental Clarification Cited<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>C.B.E. &amp; C. Circular No. 1053\/2\/2017-C.X., dated 10-3-2017 [Para 6]<\/li>\n<li>Instruction F. No. 1080\/9\/DLA\/MISC\/15, dated 21-12-2015 [Para 6]<\/li>\n<li>Instruction No. 5\/2023-GST, dated 13-12-2023 [Paras 9, 31]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><em>List of Notifications Cited<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=Notification%20No.%2025%2F2012-S.T.&amp;itemType=AP\">Notification No. 25\/2012-S.T.<\/a>, dated 20-6-2012 [Paras 3, 14]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Case Details: Ramnath Prasad Versus Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise,&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":3694,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[49,51,63],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3662","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-excise-service-tax","category-news-excise-service-tax","category-est-case-chronicles"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>No Interference Needed as Assessee Ignored SCN &amp; Hearings | HC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Patna HC upholds order confirming tax liability as assessee failed to respond to SCN or attend hearings despite multiple opportunities.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"No Interference Needed as Assessee Ignored SCN &amp; Hearings | HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Patna HC upholds order confirming tax liability as assessee failed to respond to SCN or attend hearings despite multiple opportunities.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Centax-Blogs\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-05T06:33:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/3.-No-Interference-Needed-as-Assessee-Ignored-SCN-Hearings-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"540\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kriti Sharma\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kriti Sharma\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kriti Sharma\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ec6616ec60dcf123f90d827e5ad10270\"},\"headline\":\"No Interference Needed as Assessee Ignored SCN &#038; Hearings | HC\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-05T06:33:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc\"},\"wordCount\":510,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/3.-No-Interference-Needed-as-Assessee-Ignored-SCN-Hearings-HC.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Excise &amp; Service Tax\",\"News\",\"Case Chronicles\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc\",\"name\":\"No Interference Needed as Assessee Ignored SCN & Hearings | HC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/3.-No-Interference-Needed-as-Assessee-Ignored-SCN-Hearings-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-05T06:33:56+00:00\",\"description\":\"Patna HC upholds order confirming tax liability as assessee failed to respond to SCN or attend hearings despite multiple opportunities.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/3.-No-Interference-Needed-as-Assessee-Ignored-SCN-Hearings-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/3.-No-Interference-Needed-as-Assessee-Ignored-SCN-Hearings-HC.jpg\",\"width\":920,\"height\":540,\"caption\":\"Failure to Reply SCN\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"No Interference Needed as Assessee Ignored SCN &#038; Hearings | HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Centax-Blogs\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Centax-Blogs\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp\",\"width\":536,\"height\":133,\"caption\":\"Centax-Blogs\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ec6616ec60dcf123f90d827e5ad10270\",\"name\":\"Kriti Sharma\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ae7808b01d77de5dd0be43270be33948?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ae7808b01d77de5dd0be43270be33948?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kriti Sharma\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/author\/kriti\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No Interference Needed as Assessee Ignored SCN & Hearings | HC","description":"Patna HC upholds order confirming tax liability as assessee failed to respond to SCN or attend hearings despite multiple opportunities.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"No Interference Needed as Assessee Ignored SCN & Hearings | HC","og_description":"Patna HC upholds order confirming tax liability as assessee failed to respond to SCN or attend hearings despite multiple opportunities.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc","og_site_name":"Centax-Blogs","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia","article_published_time":"2025-05-05T06:33:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":920,"height":540,"url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/3.-No-Interference-Needed-as-Assessee-Ignored-SCN-Hearings-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Kriti Sharma","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kriti Sharma","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc"},"author":{"name":"Kriti Sharma","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ec6616ec60dcf123f90d827e5ad10270"},"headline":"No Interference Needed as Assessee Ignored SCN &#038; Hearings | HC","datePublished":"2025-05-05T06:33:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc"},"wordCount":510,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/3.-No-Interference-Needed-as-Assessee-Ignored-SCN-Hearings-HC.jpg","articleSection":["Excise &amp; Service Tax","News","Case Chronicles"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc","name":"No Interference Needed as Assessee Ignored SCN & Hearings | HC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/3.-No-Interference-Needed-as-Assessee-Ignored-SCN-Hearings-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2025-05-05T06:33:56+00:00","description":"Patna HC upholds order confirming tax liability as assessee failed to respond to SCN or attend hearings despite multiple opportunities.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/3.-No-Interference-Needed-as-Assessee-Ignored-SCN-Hearings-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/3.-No-Interference-Needed-as-Assessee-Ignored-SCN-Hearings-HC.jpg","width":920,"height":540,"caption":"Failure to Reply SCN"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/no-interference-needed-as-assessee-ignored-scn-hearings-hc#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"No Interference Needed as Assessee Ignored SCN &#038; Hearings | HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/","name":"Centax-Blogs","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Centax-Blogs","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp","width":536,"height":133,"caption":"Centax-Blogs"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ec6616ec60dcf123f90d827e5ad10270","name":"Kriti Sharma","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ae7808b01d77de5dd0be43270be33948?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ae7808b01d77de5dd0be43270be33948?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Kriti Sharma"},"url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/author\/kriti"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3662","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3662"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3662\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3668,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3662\/revisions\/3668"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3694"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3662"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3662"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3662"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}