{"id":3695,"date":"2025-05-06T15:42:23","date_gmt":"2025-05-06T10:12:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?p=3695"},"modified":"2025-05-06T15:42:23","modified_gmt":"2025-05-06T10:12:23","slug":"extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat","title":{"rendered":"Extended Limitation Denied Without Evasion Intent | CESTAT"},"content":{"rendered":"<pre><strong>Case Details: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/latest-news-updates\/excise-service-tax\/101010000000395926\/extended-period-of-limitation-could-not-have-been-invoked-in-absence-of-any-intent-by-assessee-for-evasion-cestat\">Aglowmed Ltd. Versus Commissioner Central Goods and Service Tax, Dehradun (2025) 29 Centax 423 (Tri.-Del)<\/a><\/strong><\/pre>\n<h2><em>Judiciary and Counsel Details<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Justice Dilip Gupta<\/strong>, President &amp; <strong>Shri P.V. Subba Rao<\/strong>, Member (T)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Ms Priyanka Goel<\/strong>, Adv., for the Appellant.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Shri Rakesh Agarwal<\/strong>, Authorised Representative, for the Respondent.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><em>Facts of the Case<\/em><\/h2>\n<p>The appellant, a manufacturer of pharmaceutical goods, claimed benefits under exemption notifications issued under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and discharged duty liabilities through self-assessment, maintaining regular statutory filings. Between 2014 and 2018, the Department conducted three audits, raising no objections to the claimed exemption. In 2021, a show-cause notice was issued, alleging wrongful availment of the exemption and invoking the extended period of limitation under Section 11A(4) of the Central Excise Act, asserting the intent to evade excise duty.<\/p>\n<p>The appellant contended that the exemption was claimed based on a bona fide interpretation of the relevant notifications. They emphasised the absence of suppression or fraud, citing the regular filing of returns and audits without objections. The appellant maintained that the extended limitation period could only apply if fraudulent intent or willful suppression was clearly demonstrated. The matter was thereafter brought before the Hon\u2019ble CESTAT for adjudication.<\/p>\n<h2><em>CESTAT Held<\/em><\/h2>\n<p>The Hon\u2019ble CESTAT held that the extended period of limitation under Section 11A(4) could not be invoked without a clear finding of deliberate suppression of facts. It observed that in taxation law, suppression must be intentional and aimed at escaping tax liability, which requires specific evidence. The Tribunal noted that the show-cause notice merely alleged wrongful availment of exemption without explaining how the petitioner intended to evade duty. It further observed that the department had presumed intent based solely on procedural non-compliance and failed to assess the appellant\u2019s reply objectively. Concluding that there was no material to prove deliberate intent, the Tribunal held that the extended limitation could not apply and confined the duty demand to the normal limitation period.<\/p>\n<h2><em>List of Cases Cited<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2005%20(188)%20E.L.T.%20149%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Anand Nishikawa Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2005 (188) E.L.T. 149 (S.C.) \u2014 Relied on [Para 35]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2018%20(12)%20G.S.T.L.%20368%20(Del.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Bharat Hotels Limited v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2018 (12) G.S.T.L. 368 (Del.) \u2014 Relied on [Para 39]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2023%20(385)%20E.L.T.%20481%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Commissioner v. Reliance Industries Ltd.<\/a> \u2014 2023 (385) E.L.T. 481 (S.C.) = (2023) 8 Centax 96 (S.C.) \u2014 Relied on [Para 44]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2023%20(385)%20E.L.T.%20826%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Commissioner v. Sunshine Steel Industries<\/a> \u2014 2023 (385) E.L.T. 826 (S.C.) = (2023) 8 Centax 210 (S.C.)\u2014 Relied on [Para 58]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2024%20(388)%20E.L.T.%20418%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Commissioner v. Urmin Products Pvt. Ltd.<\/a> \u2014 2024 (388) E.L.T. 418 (S.C.) = (2023) 11 Centax 270 (S.C.) \u2014 Distinguished [Para 45]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2007%20(216)%20E.L.T.%20177%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Continental Foundation Jt. Venture v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2007 (216) E.L.T. 177 (S.C.) \u2014 Relied on [Para 38]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2003%20(152)%20E.L.T.%2039%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Easland Combines v. Collector<\/a> \u2014 2003 (152) E.L.T. 39 (S.C.) \u2014 Relied on [Para 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=(2023)%2011%20Centax%202%20(Tri.%20-%20Del.)&amp;itemType=AP\">GD Goenka Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 (2023) 11 Centax 2 (Tri. &#8211; Del.)\u2014Relied on [Paras 41, 51]<\/li>\n<li>Godawari Power &amp; Ispat Ltd. v. Commissioner \u2014 2024 (4) TMI 816-CESTAT New Delhi \u2014 Distinguished [Paras 54, 55]<\/li>\n<li>India Glycols Ltd. v. Commissioner \u2014 Excise Appeal No. 52129\/2019, dated 20-8-2024 by CESTAT, New Delhi \u2014 Relied on [Para 53]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=(2024)%2021%20Centax%20199%20(Tri.%20-%20Del.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Kalya Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 (2024) 21 Centax 199 (Tri. &#8211; Del.)\u2014Relied on [Para 59]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2023%20(73)%20G.S.T.L.%20310%20(Del.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. v. Union of India<\/a> \u2014 2023 (73) G.S.T.L. 310 (Del.) = (2023) 5 Centax 279 (Del.)\u2014Relied on [Para 40]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=(2024)%2017%20Centax%20318%20(Tri.%20-%20All.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Patanjali Yogpeeth Trust v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 (2024) 17 Centax 318 (Tri. &#8211; All.) \u2014 Distinguished [Para 47]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=1995%20(78)%20E.L.T.%20401%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company v. Collector<\/a> \u2014 1995 (78) E.L.T. 401 (S.C.) \u2014 Relied on [Paras 34, 35]<\/li>\n<li>Raydean Industries v. Commissioner \u2014 Excise Appeal No. 52480\/2019, dated 19-12-2022 by CESTAT, New Delhi \u2014 Relied on [Para 50]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=(2023)%208%20Centax%20209%20(Tri.%20-%20Del.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Sunshine Steel Industries v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 (2023) 8 Centax 209 (Tri. &#8211; Del.)\u2014Relied on [Paras 57, 58]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2013%20(288)%20E.L.T.%20161%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Uniworth Textiles Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2013 (288) E.L.T. 161 (S.C.) \u2014 Relied on [Para 37]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><em>List of Notifications Cited<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Notification dated 10-6-2003 [Para 3]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=Notification%20No.%201%2F2011-C.E.&amp;itemType=AP\">Notification No. 1\/2011-C.E.<\/a>, dated 1-3-2011 [Paras 1, 3]<\/li>\n<li>Notification dated 17-3-2012 [Para 1]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Case Details: Aglowmed Ltd. Versus Commissioner Central Goods and Service Tax, Dehradun&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":3714,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[49,51,63],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3695","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-excise-service-tax","category-news-excise-service-tax","category-est-case-chronicles"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Extended Limitation Denied Without Evasion Intent | CESTAT<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"CESTAT Delhi in Aglowmed Ltd. (2025) rules Section 11A extended limitation can\u2019t apply without deliberate suppression; excise duty demand limited to normal period.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Extended Limitation Denied Without Evasion Intent | CESTAT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"CESTAT Delhi in Aglowmed Ltd. (2025) rules Section 11A extended limitation can\u2019t apply without deliberate suppression; excise duty demand limited to normal period.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Centax-Blogs\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-06T10:12:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/3.-Extended-Limitation-Denied-Without-Evasion-Intent-CESTAT.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"540\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kriti Sharma\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kriti Sharma\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kriti Sharma\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ec6616ec60dcf123f90d827e5ad10270\"},\"headline\":\"Extended Limitation Denied Without Evasion Intent | CESTAT\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-06T10:12:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat\"},\"wordCount\":578,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/3.-Extended-Limitation-Denied-Without-Evasion-Intent-CESTAT.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Excise &amp; Service Tax\",\"News\",\"Case Chronicles\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat\",\"name\":\"Extended Limitation Denied Without Evasion Intent | CESTAT\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/3.-Extended-Limitation-Denied-Without-Evasion-Intent-CESTAT.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-06T10:12:23+00:00\",\"description\":\"CESTAT Delhi in Aglowmed Ltd. (2025) rules Section 11A extended limitation can\u2019t apply without deliberate suppression; excise duty demand limited to normal period.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/3.-Extended-Limitation-Denied-Without-Evasion-Intent-CESTAT.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/3.-Extended-Limitation-Denied-Without-Evasion-Intent-CESTAT.jpg\",\"width\":920,\"height\":540,\"caption\":\"section 11A extended limitation\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Extended Limitation Denied Without Evasion Intent | CESTAT\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Centax-Blogs\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Centax-Blogs\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp\",\"width\":536,\"height\":133,\"caption\":\"Centax-Blogs\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ec6616ec60dcf123f90d827e5ad10270\",\"name\":\"Kriti Sharma\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ae7808b01d77de5dd0be43270be33948?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ae7808b01d77de5dd0be43270be33948?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kriti Sharma\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/author\/kriti\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Extended Limitation Denied Without Evasion Intent | CESTAT","description":"CESTAT Delhi in Aglowmed Ltd. (2025) rules Section 11A extended limitation can\u2019t apply without deliberate suppression; excise duty demand limited to normal period.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Extended Limitation Denied Without Evasion Intent | CESTAT","og_description":"CESTAT Delhi in Aglowmed Ltd. (2025) rules Section 11A extended limitation can\u2019t apply without deliberate suppression; excise duty demand limited to normal period.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat","og_site_name":"Centax-Blogs","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia","article_published_time":"2025-05-06T10:12:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":920,"height":540,"url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/3.-Extended-Limitation-Denied-Without-Evasion-Intent-CESTAT.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Kriti Sharma","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kriti Sharma","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat"},"author":{"name":"Kriti Sharma","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ec6616ec60dcf123f90d827e5ad10270"},"headline":"Extended Limitation Denied Without Evasion Intent | CESTAT","datePublished":"2025-05-06T10:12:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat"},"wordCount":578,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/3.-Extended-Limitation-Denied-Without-Evasion-Intent-CESTAT.jpg","articleSection":["Excise &amp; Service Tax","News","Case Chronicles"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat","name":"Extended Limitation Denied Without Evasion Intent | CESTAT","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/3.-Extended-Limitation-Denied-Without-Evasion-Intent-CESTAT.jpg","datePublished":"2025-05-06T10:12:23+00:00","description":"CESTAT Delhi in Aglowmed Ltd. (2025) rules Section 11A extended limitation can\u2019t apply without deliberate suppression; excise duty demand limited to normal period.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/3.-Extended-Limitation-Denied-Without-Evasion-Intent-CESTAT.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/3.-Extended-Limitation-Denied-Without-Evasion-Intent-CESTAT.jpg","width":920,"height":540,"caption":"section 11A extended limitation"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/extended-limitation-denied-without-evasion-intent-cestat#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Extended Limitation Denied Without Evasion Intent | CESTAT"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/","name":"Centax-Blogs","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Centax-Blogs","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp","width":536,"height":133,"caption":"Centax-Blogs"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ec6616ec60dcf123f90d827e5ad10270","name":"Kriti Sharma","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ae7808b01d77de5dd0be43270be33948?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ae7808b01d77de5dd0be43270be33948?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Kriti Sharma"},"url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/author\/kriti"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3695","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3695"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3695\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3699,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3695\/revisions\/3699"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3714"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3695"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3695"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3695"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}