{"id":4204,"date":"2025-06-06T08:45:19","date_gmt":"2025-06-06T03:15:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?p=4204"},"modified":"2025-06-06T08:45:19","modified_gmt":"2025-06-06T03:15:19","slug":"pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat","title":{"rendered":"Pantographs for Railways Classifiable Under 8607, Not 8535 | CESTAT"},"content":{"rendered":"<pre><strong>Case Details: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/latest-news-updates\/excise-service-tax\/101010000000399085\/pantographs-for-railways-rightly-classifiable-under-heading-8607-and-cryptic-order-classifying-them-under-8535-unsustainable-cestat\">Faiveley Transport RailTechnologies India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST &amp; Central Excise, Salem (2025) 30 Centax 432 (Tri.-Mad)<\/a><\/strong><\/pre>\n<h2><em>Judiciary and Counsel Details<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>S\/Shri P. Dinesha<\/strong>, Member (J) &amp; <strong>M. Ajit Kumar<\/strong>, Member (T)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Shri Raghavan Ramabhadran<\/strong>, Adv., for the Appellant.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Shri P. Ayyamperumal<\/strong>, Special Counsel, for the Respondent.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><em>Facts of the Case<\/em><\/h2>\n<p>The appellant-assessee, engaged in supplying pantographs and their parts exclusively for use in railways and tramway locomotives, contested the classification of these goods. The assessee classified the pantographs under Chapter Heading 8607 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, whereas the Department of Revenue contended for classification under Chapter Heading 8535.<\/p>\n<p>The impugned adjudication order was cryptic and non-speaking, merely stating that classification under Central Excise is governed by the Notes to Sections\/Chapters of the Schedule to Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The adjudicating authority classified the goods under Chapter Heading 8535 without addressing the substantive issue or discharging the burden of proof on the Revenue. The matter was accordingly placed before the Madras Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT).<\/p>\n<h2><em>CESTAT Held<\/em><\/h2>\n<p>The Hon\u2019ble CESTAT held that the impugned order was unsustainable as it was cryptic and non-speaking, failing to discharge the onus on the Department of Revenue to prove that the pantographs fell under Chapter Heading 8535. The Tribunal observed that classification under Central Excise must follow the legal provisions and explanatory Notes of the Tariff Act, and usage or application cannot override these statutory classifications. Since the Revenue failed to establish its claim through a reasoned order on merits, the classification declared by the appellant under Chapter Heading 8607 was upheld.<\/p>\n<h2><em>List of Cases Cited<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2015%20(321)%20E.L.T.A274%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Commissioner v. Hitech Computers<\/a> \u2014 2015 (321) E.L.T.A274 (S.C.) \u2014 Referred [Para 10]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2009%20(239)%20E.L.T.%20385%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Commissioner v. SKF India Ltd<\/a> \u2014 2009 (239) E.L.T. 385 (S.C.) \u2014 Relied on [Para 20]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=(2023)%2011%20Centax%202%20(Tri.%20-%20Del.)&amp;itemType=AP\">GD Goenka Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 (2023) 11 Centax 2 (Tri. &#8211; Del.) \u2014 Relied on [Para 19]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2006%20(197)%20E.L.T.%20324%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">H.P.L. Chemicals Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2006 (197) E.L.T. 324 (S.C.) \u2014 Relied on [Para 12]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2005%20(180)%20E.L.T.%20356%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Hi-Tech Computers v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2005 (180) E.L.T. 356 (Tribunal) \u2014 Referred [Para 10]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2017%20(352)%20E.L.T.%20113%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Parle Agro (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2017 (352) E.L.T. 113 (S.C.) \u2014 Relied on [Para 12]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2014%20(306)%20E.L.T.%20377%20(All.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Polyplex Corpn.Ltd. v. Union of India<\/a> \u2014 2014 (306) E.L.T. 377 (All.) \u2014 Relied on [Para 9]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=1995%20(78)%20E.L.T.%20401%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company v. Collector<\/a> \u2014 1995 (78) E.L.T. 401 (S.C.) \u2014 Relied on [Para 18]<\/li>\n<li>Shri Swamiji of Shri Admar Mutt v. Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Dept. \u2014 AIR 1980 SC 1 \u2014 Relied on [Para 12]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=1996%20(87)%20E.L.T.%2012%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Union of India v. Garware Nylons Ltd.<\/a> \u2014 1996 (87) E.L.T. 12 (S.C.) \u2014 Relied on [Para 12]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2021%20(376)%20E.L.T.%2014%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Westinghouse Saxby Farmer Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2021 (376) E.L.T. 14 (S.C.) \u2014 Referred [Para 3.1]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><em>List of Notifications Cited<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=Notification%20No.%204%2F2014-C.E.&amp;itemType=AP\">Notification No. 4\/2014-C.E.<\/a>, dated 17-2-2014 [Para 3.1]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=Notification%20No.%2012%2F2016-C.E.&amp;itemType=AP\">Notification No. 12\/2016-C.E.<\/a> [Para 3.1]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Case Details: Faiveley Transport RailTechnologies India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of GST&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":4233,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[49,51,63],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4204","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-excise-service-tax","category-news-excise-service-tax","category-est-case-chronicles"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Pantographs for Railways Classifiable Under 8607, Not 8535 | CESTAT<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"CESTAT upholds pantograph tariff classification under Heading 8607, rejecting 8535, in Faiveley RailTechnologies India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, 2025.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pantographs for Railways Classifiable Under 8607, Not 8535 | CESTAT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"CESTAT upholds pantograph tariff classification under Heading 8607, rejecting 8535, in Faiveley RailTechnologies India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, 2025.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Centax-Blogs\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-06T03:15:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/3.-Pantographs-for-Railways-Classifiable-Under-8607-Not-8535-CESTAT.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"540\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kriti Sharma\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kriti Sharma\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kriti Sharma\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ec6616ec60dcf123f90d827e5ad10270\"},\"headline\":\"Pantographs for Railways Classifiable Under 8607, Not 8535 | CESTAT\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-06T03:15:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat\"},\"wordCount\":424,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/3.-Pantographs-for-Railways-Classifiable-Under-8607-Not-8535-CESTAT.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Excise &amp; Service Tax\",\"News\",\"Case Chronicles\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat\",\"name\":\"Pantographs for Railways Classifiable Under 8607, Not 8535 | CESTAT\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/3.-Pantographs-for-Railways-Classifiable-Under-8607-Not-8535-CESTAT.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-06T03:15:19+00:00\",\"description\":\"CESTAT upholds pantograph tariff classification under Heading 8607, rejecting 8535, in Faiveley RailTechnologies India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, 2025.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/3.-Pantographs-for-Railways-Classifiable-Under-8607-Not-8535-CESTAT.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/3.-Pantographs-for-Railways-Classifiable-Under-8607-Not-8535-CESTAT.jpg\",\"width\":920,\"height\":540,\"caption\":\"pantograph tariff classification\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pantographs for Railways Classifiable Under 8607, Not 8535 | CESTAT\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Centax-Blogs\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Centax-Blogs\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp\",\"width\":536,\"height\":133,\"caption\":\"Centax-Blogs\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ec6616ec60dcf123f90d827e5ad10270\",\"name\":\"Kriti Sharma\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ae7808b01d77de5dd0be43270be33948?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ae7808b01d77de5dd0be43270be33948?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kriti Sharma\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/author\/kriti\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pantographs for Railways Classifiable Under 8607, Not 8535 | CESTAT","description":"CESTAT upholds pantograph tariff classification under Heading 8607, rejecting 8535, in Faiveley RailTechnologies India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, 2025.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pantographs for Railways Classifiable Under 8607, Not 8535 | CESTAT","og_description":"CESTAT upholds pantograph tariff classification under Heading 8607, rejecting 8535, in Faiveley RailTechnologies India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, 2025.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat","og_site_name":"Centax-Blogs","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia","article_published_time":"2025-06-06T03:15:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":920,"height":540,"url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/3.-Pantographs-for-Railways-Classifiable-Under-8607-Not-8535-CESTAT.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Kriti Sharma","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kriti Sharma","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat"},"author":{"name":"Kriti Sharma","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ec6616ec60dcf123f90d827e5ad10270"},"headline":"Pantographs for Railways Classifiable Under 8607, Not 8535 | CESTAT","datePublished":"2025-06-06T03:15:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat"},"wordCount":424,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/3.-Pantographs-for-Railways-Classifiable-Under-8607-Not-8535-CESTAT.jpg","articleSection":["Excise &amp; Service Tax","News","Case Chronicles"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat","name":"Pantographs for Railways Classifiable Under 8607, Not 8535 | CESTAT","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/3.-Pantographs-for-Railways-Classifiable-Under-8607-Not-8535-CESTAT.jpg","datePublished":"2025-06-06T03:15:19+00:00","description":"CESTAT upholds pantograph tariff classification under Heading 8607, rejecting 8535, in Faiveley RailTechnologies India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, 2025.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/3.-Pantographs-for-Railways-Classifiable-Under-8607-Not-8535-CESTAT.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/3.-Pantographs-for-Railways-Classifiable-Under-8607-Not-8535-CESTAT.jpg","width":920,"height":540,"caption":"pantograph tariff classification"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/pantographs-for-railways-classifiable-cestat#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pantographs for Railways Classifiable Under 8607, Not 8535 | CESTAT"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/","name":"Centax-Blogs","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Centax-Blogs","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp","width":536,"height":133,"caption":"Centax-Blogs"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/ec6616ec60dcf123f90d827e5ad10270","name":"Kriti Sharma","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ae7808b01d77de5dd0be43270be33948?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ae7808b01d77de5dd0be43270be33948?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Kriti Sharma"},"url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/author\/kriti"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4204","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4204"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4204\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4208,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4204\/revisions\/4208"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4233"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4204"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4204"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4204"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}