{"id":5302,"date":"2025-08-13T17:58:56","date_gmt":"2025-08-13T12:28:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?p=5302"},"modified":"2025-08-13T17:58:56","modified_gmt":"2025-08-13T12:28:56","slug":"lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat","title":{"rendered":"Lessor liable for Service Tax on extra lease rent for vacant land | CESTAT"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<pre>Case Details: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/latest-news-updates\/excise-service-tax\/101010000000402258\/lessor-is-liable-to-pay-service-tax-on-additional-lease-amount-of-vacant-lands-received-from-lessee-cestat\"><span class=\"TextRun SCXW184379693 BCX0\" lang=\"EN-IN\" xml:lang=\"EN-IN\" data-contrast=\"none\"><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW184379693 BCX0\" data-ccp-parastyle=\"Body-All Documents\" data-ccp-parastyle-defn=\"{&quot;ObjectId&quot;:&quot;f54e3151-7552-5563-bc14-dd1598e94375|1&quot;,&quot;ClassId&quot;:1073872969,&quot;Properties&quot;:[469775450,&quot;Body-All Documents&quot;,201340122,&quot;2&quot;,134234082,&quot;true&quot;,134233614,&quot;true&quot;,469778129,&quot;Body-AllDocuments&quot;,335572020,&quot;1&quot;,469777841,&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,469777842,&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,469777844,&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,469769226,&quot;Book Antiqua,Times New Roman&quot;,335551500,&quot;0&quot;,134233111,&quot;true&quot;,335559740,&quot;280&quot;,201341983,&quot;1&quot;,335559739,&quot;0&quot;,335551550,&quot;6&quot;,335551620,&quot;6&quot;,469777929,&quot;Body-All Documents Char&quot;,201342446,&quot;1&quot;,201342447,&quot;5&quot;,201342448,&quot;1&quot;,201342449,&quot;1&quot;,469777843,&quot;Calibri&quot;,201341986,&quot;1&quot;,268442635,&quot;24&quot;]}\" data-ccp-parastyle-linked-defn=\"{&quot;ObjectId&quot;:&quot;d1cb5994-2cf1-5883-8af4-faa182bd9769|1&quot;,&quot;ClassId&quot;:1073872969,&quot;Properties&quot;:[201342446,&quot;1&quot;,201342447,&quot;5&quot;,201342448,&quot;1&quot;,201342449,&quot;1&quot;,469777841,&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,469777842,&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,469777843,&quot;Calibri&quot;,469777844,&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,201341986,&quot;1&quot;,469769226,&quot;Book Antiqua,Times New Roman&quot;,268442635,&quot;24&quot;,469775450,&quot;Body-All Documents Char&quot;,201340122,&quot;1&quot;,134233614,&quot;true&quot;,469778129,&quot;Body-AllDocumentsChar&quot;,335572020,&quot;1&quot;,134231262,&quot;true&quot;,335551500,&quot;0&quot;,134233111,&quot;true&quot;,469777929,&quot;Body-All Documents&quot;,469778324,&quot;Default Paragraph Font&quot;]}\">Shree Vijayalakshmi Charitable Trust Versus Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Coimbatore<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW184379693 BCX0\" data-ccp-parastyle=\"Body-All Documents\"> (2025) 33 Centax 86 (Tri.-Mad)<\/span><\/span><\/a><span class=\"EOP SCXW250202212 BCX0\" data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:1,&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6,&quot;335559739&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:280}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/pre>\n<h2><em>Judiciary and Counsel Details<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<div id=\"dbs_judge\">S\/Shri\u00a0<span id=\"111170000000097921\">M. Ajit Kumar<\/span>, Member (T) and\u00a0<span id=\"111170000000104785\">Ajayan T.V.<\/span>, Member (J)<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li><i>Shri\u00a0<span id=\"111170000000167006\">K. Sankaranarayan<\/span>, Adv., for the Appellant<\/i><\/li>\n<li><i>Shri\u00a0<span id=\"111170000000004657\">Anoop Singh<\/span>, Authorised Representative, for the Respondent.<\/i><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><em>Facts of the Case<\/em><\/h2>\n<p><span class=\"TextRun SCXW169169759 BCX0\" lang=\"EN-IN\" xml:lang=\"EN-IN\" data-contrast=\"none\"><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW169169759 BCX0\" data-ccp-parastyle=\"Body-All Documents\" data-ccp-parastyle-defn=\"{&quot;ObjectId&quot;:&quot;f54e3151-7552-5563-bc14-dd1598e94375|1&quot;,&quot;ClassId&quot;:1073872969,&quot;Properties&quot;:[469775450,&quot;Body-All Documents&quot;,201340122,&quot;2&quot;,134234082,&quot;true&quot;,134233614,&quot;true&quot;,469778129,&quot;Body-AllDocuments&quot;,335572020,&quot;1&quot;,469777841,&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,469777842,&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,469777844,&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,469769226,&quot;Book Antiqua,Times New Roman&quot;,335551500,&quot;0&quot;,134233111,&quot;true&quot;,335559740,&quot;280&quot;,201341983,&quot;1&quot;,335559739,&quot;0&quot;,335551550,&quot;6&quot;,335551620,&quot;6&quot;,469777929,&quot;Body-All Documents Char&quot;,201342446,&quot;1&quot;,201342447,&quot;5&quot;,201342448,&quot;1&quot;,201342449,&quot;1&quot;,469777843,&quot;Calibri&quot;,201341986,&quot;1&quot;,268442635,&quot;24&quot;]}\" data-ccp-parastyle-linked-defn=\"{&quot;ObjectId&quot;:&quot;d1cb5994-2cf1-5883-8af4-faa182bd9769|1&quot;,&quot;ClassId&quot;:1073872969,&quot;Properties&quot;:[201342446,&quot;1&quot;,201342447,&quot;5&quot;,201342448,&quot;1&quot;,201342449,&quot;1&quot;,469777841,&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,469777842,&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,469777843,&quot;Calibri&quot;,469777844,&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,201341986,&quot;1&quot;,469769226,&quot;Book Antiqua,Times New Roman&quot;,268442635,&quot;24&quot;,469775450,&quot;Body-All Documents Char&quot;,201340122,&quot;1&quot;,134233614,&quot;true&quot;,469778129,&quot;Body-AllDocumentsChar&quot;,335572020,&quot;1&quot;,134231262,&quot;true&quot;,335551500,&quot;0&quot;,134233111,&quot;true&quot;,469777929,&quot;Body-All Documents&quot;,469778324,&quot;Default Paragraph Font&quot;]}\">The Appellant, acting as lessor, entered into a notarized lease agreement with the lessee for vacant land, with a separate lease deed stipulating a fixed yearly lease amount. The notarized agreement further provided that, as there were sources and assets in the property, the lessee would pay the lessor 75% of receipts every month as additional lease amount. A joint agreement between the lessor, lessee, and the District Collector recorded that the quarrying lease was granted by the District Collector on the lessee\u2019s application for quarrying and carrying away minor minerals under the Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Rules, 1959. The agreements collectively established that the lessee bore all risks, maintained the property, deposited security, paid seigniorage fees, and complied with statutory requirements. Both parties disclosed the additional lease amounts as rent before the Income Tax authorities and in financial statements. The Department issued a show cause notice alleging that the Appellant had provided \u201crenting of immovable property\u201d service taxable under Sections 65B(44) and 65B(51) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Appellant contended that the arrangement was a joint venture on a principal-to-principal basis involving fixed-ratio revenue sharing, attracting the mutuality doctrine; that tax could not be determined by nomenclature or accounting treatment; that the transaction amounted to a sale exigible to VAT; and that the lessee acted as hired labour while the lessor produced excisable goods. The matter was accordingly placed before the <\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW169169759 BCX0\" data-ccp-parastyle=\"Body-All Documents\">CESTAT<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW169169759 BCX0\" data-ccp-parastyle=\"Body-All Documents\">.<\/span><\/span><span class=\"EOP SCXW169169759 BCX0\" data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:1,&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6,&quot;335559739&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:280}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><i>High Court Held<\/i><\/h2>\n<p><span class=\"TextRun SCXW215468916 BCX0\" lang=\"EN-IN\" xml:lang=\"EN-IN\" data-contrast=\"none\"><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW215468916 BCX0\" data-ccp-parastyle=\"Body-All Documents\" data-ccp-parastyle-defn=\"{&quot;ObjectId&quot;:&quot;f54e3151-7552-5563-bc14-dd1598e94375|1&quot;,&quot;ClassId&quot;:1073872969,&quot;Properties&quot;:[469775450,&quot;Body-All Documents&quot;,201340122,&quot;2&quot;,134234082,&quot;true&quot;,134233614,&quot;true&quot;,469778129,&quot;Body-AllDocuments&quot;,335572020,&quot;1&quot;,469777841,&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,469777842,&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,469777844,&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,469769226,&quot;Book Antiqua,Times New Roman&quot;,335551500,&quot;0&quot;,134233111,&quot;true&quot;,335559740,&quot;280&quot;,201341983,&quot;1&quot;,335559739,&quot;0&quot;,335551550,&quot;6&quot;,335551620,&quot;6&quot;,469777929,&quot;Body-All Documents Char&quot;,201342446,&quot;1&quot;,201342447,&quot;5&quot;,201342448,&quot;1&quot;,201342449,&quot;1&quot;,469777843,&quot;Calibri&quot;,201341986,&quot;1&quot;,268442635,&quot;24&quot;]}\" data-ccp-parastyle-linked-defn=\"{&quot;ObjectId&quot;:&quot;d1cb5994-2cf1-5883-8af4-faa182bd9769|1&quot;,&quot;ClassId&quot;:1073872969,&quot;Properties&quot;:[201342446,&quot;1&quot;,201342447,&quot;5&quot;,201342448,&quot;1&quot;,201342449,&quot;1&quot;,469777841,&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,469777842,&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,469777843,&quot;Calibri&quot;,469777844,&quot;Book Antiqua&quot;,201341986,&quot;1&quot;,469769226,&quot;Book Antiqua,Times New Roman&quot;,268442635,&quot;24&quot;,469775450,&quot;Body-All Documents Char&quot;,201340122,&quot;1&quot;,134233614,&quot;true&quot;,469778129,&quot;Body-AllDocumentsChar&quot;,335572020,&quot;1&quot;,134231262,&quot;true&quot;,335551500,&quot;0&quot;,134233111,&quot;true&quot;,469777929,&quot;Body-All Documents&quot;,469778324,&quot;Default Paragraph Font&quot;]}\">The CESTAT held that the parties were ad idem on the transaction being a lease, and the quantification of additional lease amount as a percentage of receipts did not alter its character as rent. Reading the lease deed, notarized agreements, and joint agreement together, there was no indication of a joint venture involving shared responsibilities, joint control, or mutual risk in mining operations. The lessee alone undertook quarrying risks, and subsequent documents, including TDS exemption certificates and income tax filings, consistently presented the transaction as renting of immovable property. The Tribunal held that the leasing of vacant land fell within \u201crenting\u201d as defined in Section 65B(41) of the Finance Act, 1994, was a declared service under Section 66E(a), and was not covered by the \u201ccharitable activities\u201d exemption under Sl. No. 4 of para 2(k) of Notification No. 25\/2012-ST, dated 20-06-2012, nor within the negative list. The service tax liability arose solely from the leasing transaction, and mining operations were not subject to the impugned demand. Consequently, the lessor was held liable to pay service tax under Section 66B.<\/span><\/span><span class=\"EOP SCXW215468916 BCX0\" data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:1,&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6,&quot;335559739&quot;:0,&quot;335559740&quot;:280}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<h2>List Of Case Cited<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>AB Motions Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner \u2014 2019 (4) TMI 2043-CESTAT Chandigarh \u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 25, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2019%20(20)%20G.S.T.L.%20362%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">ACL Mobile Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_69181.93185694012\"><\/a>2019 (20) G.S.T.L. 362 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 25, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2018%20(11)%20G.S.T.L.%20420%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Akzo Nobel Chemicals (India) Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_35203.4226255616\"><\/a>2018 (11) G.S.T.L. 420 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2019%20(21)%20G.S.T.L.%20400%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Ambience Hospitality P. Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_28321.22131099998\"><\/a>2019 (21) G.S.T.L. 400 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Para 12, 25, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2005%20(188)%20E.L.T.%20149%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Anand Nishikawa Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_4942.873260587477\"><\/a>2005 (188) E.L.T. 149 (S.C.)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2009%20(15)%20S.T.R.%20540%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Avian Overseas Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_64962.14728070408\"><\/a>2009 (15) S.T.R. 540 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2022%20(63)%20G.S.T.L.%20351%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">B.G. Exploration &amp; Production India Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_51382.20532060929\"><\/a>2022 (64) G.S.T.L. 578 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 25, 26, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2022%20(63)%20G.S.T.L.%20351%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">B.G. Exploration &amp; Production India Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_74464.87942540657\"><\/a>2022 (63) G.S.T.L. 351 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 25, 36]<\/li>\n<li>B.S.C. Footwear Ltd. v. Ridgway (Inspector of Taxes) \u2014 [1972] 83 ITR 269 \u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2012%20(25)%20S.T.R.%20417%20(Del.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Bajaj Travels Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_93927.06845099182\"><\/a>2012 (25) S.T.R. 417 (Del.)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2006%20(2)%20S.T.R.%20161%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. v. Union of India<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_75596.9100243173\"><\/a>2006 (2) S.T.R. 161 (S.C.)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 13, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2016%20(41)%20S.T.R.%20208%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Centre For Development of Advance Computing v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_12617.855442342596\"><\/a>2016 (41) S.T.R. 208 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 25, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=1988%20(33)%20E.L.T.%20551%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Chemicals &amp; Fibres of India Ltd v. Collector<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_34225.400488229185\"><\/a>1988 (33) E.L.T. 551 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2017-TIOL-2481-CESTAT-DEL&amp;itemType=AP\">Chetak Traveling Agency v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2017-TIOL-2481-CESTAT-DEL \u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=1999%20(112)%20E.L.T.%20353%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Collector v. Dai Ichi Karkaria Ltd.<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_41723.10533709488\"><\/a>1999 (112) E.L.T. 353 (S.C.)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=(2024)%2022%20Centax%20459%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Commissioner v. AB Motions Pvt. Ltd.<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_60994.95105549371\"><\/a>(2024) 22 Centax 459 (S.C.)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 25, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2004%20(172)%20E.L.T.%20289%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Commissioner v. Acer India Ltd.<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_37097.49714972525\"><\/a>2004 (172) E.L.T. 289 (S.C.)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2020%20(34)%20G.S.T.L.%20565%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Commissioner v. Bharuch Dahej Railway Company Ltd<\/a>. \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_41001.28490037881\"><\/a>2020 (34) G.S.T.L. 565 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 25, 36]<\/li>\n<li>Commissioner v. D.C.M. Textiles \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_91871.07885572345\"><\/a>2006 (195) E.L.T. 129 (S.C.)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2007%20(216)%20E.L.T.%203%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Commissioner v. Damnet Chemicals (P) Ltd.<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_81303.56235020877\"><\/a>2007 (216) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2023%20(72)%20G.S.T.L.%20523%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Commissioner v. Goa Golf Club Pvt. Ltd.<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_28991.301391660083\"><\/a>2023 (72) G.S.T.L. 523 (Tribunal)\u00a0=\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_33002.68970770321\"><\/a>(2023) 4 Centax 306 (Tri. &#8211; Mum.)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 25, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2018%20(15)%20G.S.T.L.%20348%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Commissioner v. Gourmets Food<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_60997.61125684363\"><\/a>2018 (15) G.S.T.L. 348 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<i>Referred<\/i>\u00a0[Para 13]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2018%20(18)%20G.S.T.L.%2032%20(All.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Commissioner v. Zee Media Corporation Ltd.<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_99489.56132741996\"><\/a>2018 (18) G.S.T.L. 32 (All.)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2007%20(216)%20E.L.T.%20177%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Continental Foundation Jt. Venture v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_18174.553526562988\"><\/a>2007 (216) E.L.T. 177 (S.C.)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2015%20(40)%20S.T.R.%20973%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Cricket Club of India Ltd. v. Commissione<\/a>r \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_27898.34064256468\"><\/a>2015 (40) S.T.R. 973 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2004%20(174)%20E.L.T.%2019%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">ETA Engineering Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_18976.141479968523\"><\/a>2004 (174) E.L.T. 19 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li>Executive Engineer, Urban Division, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board v. Commissioner \u2014 2018 (5) TMI 1467-CESTAT. Chennai \u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2008%20(12)%20S.T.R.%20401%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Faqir Chand Gulati v. Uppal Agencies Pvt. Ltd.<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_90862.8459947583\"><\/a>2008 (12) S.T.R. 401 (S.C.)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 13, 24, 25, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2005%20(190)%20E.L.T.%20352%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Fibre Foils Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_64151.760224911326\"><\/a>2005 (190) E.L.T. 352 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2004%20(170)%20E.L.T.%20417%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Flyingman Air Courier Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_56238.11474347724\"><\/a>2004 (170) E.L.T. 417 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2006%20(4)%20S.T.R.%20322%20(Tribunal)%C2%A0%E2%80%94&amp;itemType=AP\">Medpro Pharma Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_10715.179290037358\"><\/a>2006 (4) S.T.R. 322 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li>Meghraj Cinema v. Commissioner \u2014 2024 (8) TMI 1053-CESTAT Mumbai \u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 25, 36]<\/li>\n<li>Moped India Limited v. Assistant Collector \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_43837.60342650968\"><\/a>1986 (23) E.L.T. 8 (S.C.)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li>Mormugao Port Trust v. Commissioner \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_97592.93257621919\"><\/a>2017 (48) S.T.R. 69 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 25, 26, 36]<\/li>\n<li>New Horizons Ltd. v. Union of India \u2014 (1995) 1 SCC 478 \u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 13, 25, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2020%20(38)%20G.S.T.L.%2078%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Niraj Prasad v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_28373.378932354597\"><\/a>2020 (38) G.S.T.L. 78 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 25, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2007%20(209)%20E.L.T.%2022%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">NRC Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_3151.6346181891477\"><\/a>2007 (209) E.L.T. 22 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=1989%20(43)%20E.L.T.%20195%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Padmini Products v. Collector<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_86527.60271457853\"><\/a>1989 (43) E.L.T. 195 (S.C.)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=1995%20(78)%20E.L.T.%20401%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company v. Collector<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_74847.16548131927\"><\/a>1995 (78) E.L.T. 401 (S.C.)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2018%20(10)%20G.S.T.L.%20496%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">PVS Multiplex India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_63793.43246872046\"><\/a>2018 (10) G.S.T.L. 496 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 25, 36]<\/li>\n<li>R.N. Gosain v. Yashpal Dhir \u2014 (1992) 4 SCC 683 \u2014\u00a0<i>Followed<\/i>\u00a0[Para 38]<\/li>\n<li>Rashmi Metaliks v. Kolkata Metropolitan Dev Authority \u2014 2013 INSC 606 \u2014\u00a0<i>Followed<\/i>\u00a0[Para 43]<\/li>\n<li>S. Chattantha Karavalar v. Central Bank of India \u2014 (1965) 3 SCR 318 \u2014\u00a0<i>Followed<\/i>\u00a0[Para 21]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2007%20(8)%20S.T.R.%20170%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Secretary, Town Hall Committee, Mysore City Corpn. v. Commissioner \u2014<\/a>\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_27491.921619169956\"><\/a>2007 (8) S.T.R. 170 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2018%20(11)%20G.S.T.L.%20427%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Sir Ganga Ram Hospital v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_97193.89721992021\"><\/a>2018 (11) G.S.T.L. 427 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 25, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2020%20(43)%20G.S.T.L.%20390%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Sir Ganga Ram Hospital v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_74565.74302548972\"><\/a>2020 (43) G.S.T.L. 390 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 25, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2006%20(195)%20E.L.T.%20284%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Siyaram Silk Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_87685.81295202722\"><\/a>2006 (195) E.L.T. 284 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2023)%2010%20Centax%20105%20(Tri.%20-%20Mad.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Spencer International Hotels Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_93999.79698782749\"><\/a>(2023) 10 Centax 105 (Tri. &#8211; Mad.)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 25, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2002%20(141)%20E.L.T.%20770%20(Tri.%20-%20Del.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Star Neon Singh v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_93315.73518626299\"><\/a>2002 (141) E.L.T. 770 (Tri. &#8211; Del.)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2015%20(3)%20TMI%20853-(SC)&amp;itemType=AP\">Taparia Tools Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax<\/a> \u2014 2015 (3) TMI 853-(SC) \u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2017%20(4)%20G.S.T.L.%2033%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Times Internet Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_47926.42791122753\"><\/a>2017 (4) G.S.T.L. 33 (Tribunal)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 25, 36]<\/li>\n<li>Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals &amp; Fertilizers Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax \u2014 [1997] 227 ITR 172 (SC) \u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=1996%20(87)%20E.L.T.%2012%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Union of India v. Garware Nylons Ltd<\/a>. \u2014\u00a0<a id=\"anchor_13977.44242483695\"><\/a>1996 (87) E.L.T. 12 (S.C.)\u00a0\u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 10, 12, 36]<\/li>\n<li>White Cliffs Hair Studio Pvt. Ltd. v. Additional Commissioner \u2014 2012 (8) TMI 105 (Mad.) \u2014\u00a0<b>Distinguished<\/b>\u00a0[Paras 12, 36]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; Case Details: Shree Vijayalakshmi Charitable Trust Versus Commissioner of GST and&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":5348,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[49,51,63],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5302","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-excise-service-tax","category-news-excise-service-tax","category-est-case-chronicles"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Lessor liable for Service Tax on extra lease rent for vacant land | CESTAT<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"CESTAT rules lessor must pay Service Tax on additional lease amount received from lessee for vacant lands under taxable service provisions.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Lessor liable for Service Tax on extra lease rent for vacant land | CESTAT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"CESTAT rules lessor must pay Service Tax on additional lease amount received from lessee for vacant lands under taxable service provisions.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Centax-Blogs\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-08-13T12:28:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/7.-Lessor-liable-for-Service-Tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-CESTAT.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"540\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Karan Negi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Karan Negi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Karan Negi\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/2f5cfb3484d9dd23108a76636b12e805\"},\"headline\":\"Lessor liable for Service Tax on extra lease rent for vacant land | CESTAT\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-13T12:28:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat\"},\"wordCount\":1151,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/7.-Lessor-liable-for-Service-Tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-CESTAT.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Excise &amp; Service Tax\",\"News\",\"Case Chronicles\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat\",\"name\":\"Lessor liable for Service Tax on extra lease rent for vacant land | CESTAT\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/7.-Lessor-liable-for-Service-Tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-CESTAT.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-13T12:28:56+00:00\",\"description\":\"CESTAT rules lessor must pay Service Tax on additional lease amount received from lessee for vacant lands under taxable service provisions.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/7.-Lessor-liable-for-Service-Tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-CESTAT.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/7.-Lessor-liable-for-Service-Tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-CESTAT.jpg\",\"width\":920,\"height\":540,\"caption\":\"Service Tax lessor liability additional lease amount vacant land lessee payments\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Lessor liable for Service Tax on extra lease rent for vacant land | CESTAT\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Centax-Blogs\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Centax-Blogs\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp\",\"width\":536,\"height\":133,\"caption\":\"Centax-Blogs\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/2f5cfb3484d9dd23108a76636b12e805\",\"name\":\"Karan Negi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7735cfc607e8d5f19ef8fc2b92925d90?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7735cfc607e8d5f19ef8fc2b92925d90?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Karan Negi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/author\/karan\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Lessor liable for Service Tax on extra lease rent for vacant land | CESTAT","description":"CESTAT rules lessor must pay Service Tax on additional lease amount received from lessee for vacant lands under taxable service provisions.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Lessor liable for Service Tax on extra lease rent for vacant land | CESTAT","og_description":"CESTAT rules lessor must pay Service Tax on additional lease amount received from lessee for vacant lands under taxable service provisions.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat","og_site_name":"Centax-Blogs","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia","article_published_time":"2025-08-13T12:28:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":920,"height":540,"url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/7.-Lessor-liable-for-Service-Tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-CESTAT.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Karan Negi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Karan Negi","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat"},"author":{"name":"Karan Negi","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/2f5cfb3484d9dd23108a76636b12e805"},"headline":"Lessor liable for Service Tax on extra lease rent for vacant land | CESTAT","datePublished":"2025-08-13T12:28:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat"},"wordCount":1151,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/7.-Lessor-liable-for-Service-Tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-CESTAT.jpg","articleSection":["Excise &amp; Service Tax","News","Case Chronicles"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat","name":"Lessor liable for Service Tax on extra lease rent for vacant land | CESTAT","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/7.-Lessor-liable-for-Service-Tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-CESTAT.jpg","datePublished":"2025-08-13T12:28:56+00:00","description":"CESTAT rules lessor must pay Service Tax on additional lease amount received from lessee for vacant lands under taxable service provisions.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/7.-Lessor-liable-for-Service-Tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-CESTAT.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/7.-Lessor-liable-for-Service-Tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-CESTAT.jpg","width":920,"height":540,"caption":"Service Tax lessor liability additional lease amount vacant land lessee payments"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/lessor-liable-for-service-tax-on-extra-lease-rent-for-vacant-land-cestat#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Lessor liable for Service Tax on extra lease rent for vacant land | CESTAT"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/","name":"Centax-Blogs","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Centax-Blogs","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp","width":536,"height":133,"caption":"Centax-Blogs"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/2f5cfb3484d9dd23108a76636b12e805","name":"Karan Negi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7735cfc607e8d5f19ef8fc2b92925d90?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7735cfc607e8d5f19ef8fc2b92925d90?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Karan Negi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/author\/karan"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5302","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5302"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5302\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5315,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5302\/revisions\/5315"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5348"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5302"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5302"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5302"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}