{"id":8039,"date":"2026-02-18T19:52:42","date_gmt":"2026-02-18T14:22:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?p=8039"},"modified":"2026-02-18T19:52:42","modified_gmt":"2026-02-18T14:22:42","slug":"refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat","title":{"rendered":"Refund After Duty Set-Off Still Subject to Unjust Enrichment | CESTAT"},"content":{"rendered":"<pre><strong>Case Details: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/latest-news-updates\/excise-service-tax\/101010000000412794\/post-duty-set-off-amount-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-in-refund-cases-matter-remanded-to-examine-burden-pass-on-cestat\">T.V.S. Motor Company Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Mysore (2025) 36 Centax 299 (Tri.-Bang)<\/a><\/strong><\/pre>\n<h2><em>Judiciary and Counsel Details<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Dr. D.M. Misra<\/strong>, Member (J) &amp; <strong>Shri Pullela Nageswara Rao<\/strong>, Member (T)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Shri Ravi Raghavan<\/strong> &amp; <strong>Ms Sneha Philip<\/strong>, Advocates, for the Appellant.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Shri Sanjay Venkat<\/strong>, Superintendent (AR), for the Respondent.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><em>Facts of the Case<\/em><\/h2>\n<p>The assessee, an automobile manufacturer, filed refund claims, contending that excess central excise duty had been paid on free service charges, abatement on discounts, and freight charges, and asserting that the incidence of such duty had not been passed on to dealers or \u2018any other person\u2019. It was contended that after netting off excess duty paid against duty short-paid, only the balance amount, if any, would be subject to unjust enrichment under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, read with Rule 7 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the adjustment of excess duty paid against duty short-paid. However, relying on illustrative examples, the Commissioner (Appeals) held that the assessee could not demonstrate that the burden of excess duty paid on discounts, claimed as a refund, had not been passed on to any other person. It was also noted that refund claims for similar discounts had been allowed and accepted in another period, as no appeal was filed by the Department. The matter was accordingly placed before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT).<\/p>\n<h2><em>CESTAT Held<\/em><\/h2>\n<p>The CESTAT held that adjustment of excess duty paid against duty short-paid was allowed, relying on its decision in J.K. Tyres &amp; Industries Ltd. [2023 (12) TMI 899 &#8211; CESTAT Bangalore] and the High Court decision in Vikrant Tyres Ltd. [2021-VIL-729-KAR-CE]. It further held that the matter required examination on the aspect of whether the incidence of duty had been passed on to any other person. The issue of unjust enrichment was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for analysis of the evidence. The appeal was accordingly allowed on the issue of netting off, and the matter was remanded.<\/p>\n<h2><em>List of Cases Cited<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2016%20(339)%20E.L.T.%20177%20(SC)&amp;itemType=AP\">Commissioner v. Addison &amp; Co. Ltd.<\/a> \u2014 2016 (339) E.L.T. 177 (SC) \u2014 Followed [Paras 3.4, 3.6, 8, 9]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2016%20(336)%20E.L.T.%20328%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Hindustan Zinc Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2016 (336) E.L.T. 328 (Tribunal) \u2014 Relied on [Para 3.2]<\/li>\n<li>J.K. Tyres &amp; Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner \u2014 2023 (12) TMI 899 \u2013 CESTAT Bangalore \u2014 Relied on [Paras 3.2, 7]<\/li>\n<li>Johnsons Matthey (India) Ltd. v. Commissioner \u2014 2017 (3) TMI 1449 CESTAT Chandigarh \u2014 Relied on [Para 3.5]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2015%20(329)%20E.L.T.%20577%20(Tribunal)&amp;itemType=AP\">Jonas Woodhead &amp; Sons (I) Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2015 (329) E.L.T. 577 (Tribunal) \u2014 Relied on [Para 3.2]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=1997%20(89)%20E.L.T.%20247%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Mafatlal Industries Ltd. v. Union of India<\/a> \u2014 1997 (89) E.L.T. 247 (S.C.) \u2014 Relied on [Para 9]<\/li>\n<li>Principal Commissioner v. Vikrant Tyres Ltd \u2014 2021-VIL-729-KAR-CE \u2014 Followed [Paras 3.3, 7]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2012%20(276)%20E.L.T.%20304%20(Kar.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Sudhir Papers Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2012 (276) E.L.T. 304 (Kar.) \u2014 Relied on [Para 3.5]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2012%20(276)%20E.L.T.%20332%20(Kar.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Toyota Kirloskar Auto Parts Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2012 (276) E.L.T. 332 (Kar.) \u2014 Relied on [Para 3.2]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Case Details: T.V.S. Motor Company Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":19,"featured_media":8054,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[49,51,63],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8039","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-excise-service-tax","category-news-excise-service-tax","category-est-case-chronicles"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Refund After Duty Set-Off Still Subject to Unjust Enrichment | CESTAT<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"CESTAT holds refund after excess duty set-off subject to unjust enrichment; matter remanded to verify if duty burden was passed on to customers.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Refund After Duty Set-Off Still Subject to Unjust Enrichment | CESTAT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"CESTAT holds refund after excess duty set-off subject to unjust enrichment; matter remanded to verify if duty burden was passed on to customers.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Centax-Blogs\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-02-18T14:22:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1.-Refund-After-Duty-Set-Off-Still-Subject.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"540\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Centax\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Centax\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Centax\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f4400180c72e79f30e22a263f2d8fd0a\"},\"headline\":\"Refund After Duty Set-Off Still Subject to Unjust Enrichment | CESTAT\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-18T14:22:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat\"},\"wordCount\":448,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1.-Refund-After-Duty-Set-Off-Still-Subject.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Excise &amp; Service Tax\",\"News\",\"Case Chronicles\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat\",\"name\":\"Refund After Duty Set-Off Still Subject to Unjust Enrichment | CESTAT\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1.-Refund-After-Duty-Set-Off-Still-Subject.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-18T14:22:42+00:00\",\"description\":\"CESTAT holds refund after excess duty set-off subject to unjust enrichment; matter remanded to verify if duty burden was passed on to customers.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1.-Refund-After-Duty-Set-Off-Still-Subject.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1.-Refund-After-Duty-Set-Off-Still-Subject.jpg\",\"width\":920,\"height\":540,\"caption\":\"Unjust enrichment in excise refund\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Refund After Duty Set-Off Still Subject to Unjust Enrichment | CESTAT\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Centax-Blogs\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Centax-Blogs\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp\",\"width\":536,\"height\":133,\"caption\":\"Centax-Blogs\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f4400180c72e79f30e22a263f2d8fd0a\",\"name\":\"Centax\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/795c4221b76ac6ccc3cbba0cc63dd055?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/795c4221b76ac6ccc3cbba0cc63dd055?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Centax\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/author\/centax-editorial-team\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Refund After Duty Set-Off Still Subject to Unjust Enrichment | CESTAT","description":"CESTAT holds refund after excess duty set-off subject to unjust enrichment; matter remanded to verify if duty burden was passed on to customers.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Refund After Duty Set-Off Still Subject to Unjust Enrichment | CESTAT","og_description":"CESTAT holds refund after excess duty set-off subject to unjust enrichment; matter remanded to verify if duty burden was passed on to customers.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat","og_site_name":"Centax-Blogs","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia","article_published_time":"2026-02-18T14:22:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":920,"height":540,"url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1.-Refund-After-Duty-Set-Off-Still-Subject.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Centax","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Centax","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat"},"author":{"name":"Centax","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f4400180c72e79f30e22a263f2d8fd0a"},"headline":"Refund After Duty Set-Off Still Subject to Unjust Enrichment | CESTAT","datePublished":"2026-02-18T14:22:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat"},"wordCount":448,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1.-Refund-After-Duty-Set-Off-Still-Subject.jpg","articleSection":["Excise &amp; Service Tax","News","Case Chronicles"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat","name":"Refund After Duty Set-Off Still Subject to Unjust Enrichment | CESTAT","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1.-Refund-After-Duty-Set-Off-Still-Subject.jpg","datePublished":"2026-02-18T14:22:42+00:00","description":"CESTAT holds refund after excess duty set-off subject to unjust enrichment; matter remanded to verify if duty burden was passed on to customers.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1.-Refund-After-Duty-Set-Off-Still-Subject.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1.-Refund-After-Duty-Set-Off-Still-Subject.jpg","width":920,"height":540,"caption":"Unjust enrichment in excise refund"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-after-duty-set-off-still-subject-to-unjust-enrichment-cestat#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Refund After Duty Set-Off Still Subject to Unjust Enrichment | CESTAT"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/","name":"Centax-Blogs","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Centax-Blogs","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp","width":536,"height":133,"caption":"Centax-Blogs"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f4400180c72e79f30e22a263f2d8fd0a","name":"Centax","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/795c4221b76ac6ccc3cbba0cc63dd055?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/795c4221b76ac6ccc3cbba0cc63dd055?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Centax"},"url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/author\/centax-editorial-team"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8039","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/19"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8039"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8039\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8042,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8039\/revisions\/8042"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8054"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8039"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8039"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8039"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}