{"id":8983,"date":"2026-05-06T17:21:00","date_gmt":"2026-05-06T11:51:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?p=8983"},"modified":"2026-05-07T11:48:48","modified_gmt":"2026-05-07T06:18:48","slug":"sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution","title":{"rendered":"SC Dismisses SLP in DEEC Exemption Case After IBC Resolution"},"content":{"rendered":"<pre><strong>Case Details: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/latest-news-updates\/customs\/101010000000419107\/hc-allowed-deec-scheme-exemption-accepting-use-of-mixed-inputs-slp-dismissed-as-assessee-dissolved-under-ibc-sc\">Commissioner of Customs (Export Promotion), Mumbai vs. Unimark Remedies Ltd. (2026) 41 Centax 419 (S.C.)<\/a><\/strong><\/pre>\n<h2><em>Judiciary and Counsel Details<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Vikram Nath<\/strong> &amp; <strong>Sandeep Mehta,<\/strong> JJ.<\/li>\n<li><strong>S\/Shri N.Venkataraman,<\/strong> A.S.G (NP), <strong>Ms Nisha Bagchi,<\/strong> Sr. Advocate, <strong>Abhishek Atrey, Bhuvan Kapoor, Raghvendra S. Srivastsa, Raman Yadav, Ms Charanya Lakshmikumaran, L. Badri Narayanan, Ms Neha Choudhary, Ms Nitum Jain, Swastik Mishra, Ms Medha Sinha, Atreya GC,<\/strong> Advocates, <strong>Gurmeet Singh Makker<\/strong> &amp; <strong>Punit Dutt Tyagi<\/strong>, AOR, for the Petitioner.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Ms Adrija Mishra,<\/strong> Advocate, <strong>S\/Shri Harsh Kaushik<\/strong> &amp; <strong>Gurmeet Singh Makker,<\/strong> AOR, for the Respondent.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><em>Facts of the Case<\/em><\/h2>\n<p>The assessee imported duty-free inputs against advance licences under the DEEC Scheme and also used inputs on payment of Customs duty along with indigenous inputs for the manufacture of final products, which were either exported or cleared into the domestic market. The benefit of exemption was denied, and the demand for customs duty was raised on the ground that final products manufactured out of duty-free inputs imported in excess could not be cleared into the domestic market before fulfilment of export obligation in terms of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2004-2009. The Bombay High Court, in the impugned order, held that Para 4.1.5 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2004-2009, inserted by amendment in April, 2005, was not applicable to advance licences issued prior to such amendment, and there was no condition that imported inputs alone should be used for the manufacture of products to be exported. It was also held that the use of mixed inputs was permissible and that the export obligation need not be fulfilled using imported inputs alone. The matter was thereafter carried in a special leave petition. The matter was accordingly placed before the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<h2><em>Supreme Court Held<\/em><\/h2>\n<p>The Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court held that the Resolution Plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, had been accepted and acted upon in respect of the assessee. The Court held that in view of such accepted Resolution Plan, the special leave petition filed by the department was liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the special leave petition was dismissed.<\/p>\n<h2><em>List of Cases Reviewed<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2017%20(355)%20E.L.T.%20193%20(Bom.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Unimark Remedies Ltd. v. Commissioner<\/a> \u2014 2017 (355) E.L.T. 193 (Bom.) \u2014 Slp dismissed [Para 2]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Case Details: Commissioner of Customs (Export Promotion), Mumbai vs. Unimark Remedies Ltd.&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":19,"featured_media":8989,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[38,177,47],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8983","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-customs","category-customs-news","category-custom-case-chronicles"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>SC Dismisses SLP in DEEC Exemption Case After IBC Resolution<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"SC dismisses Revenue SLP in DEEC exemption dispute as assessee stood resolved under IBC; mixed input use accepted by HC.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"SC Dismisses SLP in DEEC Exemption Case After IBC Resolution\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"SC dismisses Revenue SLP in DEEC exemption dispute as assessee stood resolved under IBC; mixed input use accepted by HC.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Centax-Blogs\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-06T11:51:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-07T06:18:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/3.-SC-Dismisses-SLP-in-DEEC-Exemption-Case-After-IBC-Resolutio.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"540\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Centax\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Centax\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Centax\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f4400180c72e79f30e22a263f2d8fd0a\"},\"headline\":\"SC Dismisses SLP in DEEC Exemption Case After IBC Resolution\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-06T11:51:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-07T06:18:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution\"},\"wordCount\":359,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/3.-SC-Dismisses-SLP-in-DEEC-Exemption-Case-After-IBC-Resolutio.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Customs\",\"News\",\"Case Chronicles\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution\",\"name\":\"SC Dismisses SLP in DEEC Exemption Case After IBC Resolution\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/3.-SC-Dismisses-SLP-in-DEEC-Exemption-Case-After-IBC-Resolutio.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-06T11:51:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-07T06:18:48+00:00\",\"description\":\"SC dismisses Revenue SLP in DEEC exemption dispute as assessee stood resolved under IBC; mixed input use accepted by HC.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/3.-SC-Dismisses-SLP-in-DEEC-Exemption-Case-After-IBC-Resolutio.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/3.-SC-Dismisses-SLP-in-DEEC-Exemption-Case-After-IBC-Resolutio.jpg\",\"width\":920,\"height\":540,\"caption\":\"DEEC scheme exemption\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"SC Dismisses SLP in DEEC Exemption Case After IBC Resolution\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Centax-Blogs\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Centax-Blogs\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp\",\"width\":536,\"height\":133,\"caption\":\"Centax-Blogs\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f4400180c72e79f30e22a263f2d8fd0a\",\"name\":\"Centax\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/795c4221b76ac6ccc3cbba0cc63dd055?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/795c4221b76ac6ccc3cbba0cc63dd055?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Centax\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/author\/centax-editorial-team\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"SC Dismisses SLP in DEEC Exemption Case After IBC Resolution","description":"SC dismisses Revenue SLP in DEEC exemption dispute as assessee stood resolved under IBC; mixed input use accepted by HC.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"SC Dismisses SLP in DEEC Exemption Case After IBC Resolution","og_description":"SC dismisses Revenue SLP in DEEC exemption dispute as assessee stood resolved under IBC; mixed input use accepted by HC.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution","og_site_name":"Centax-Blogs","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia","article_published_time":"2026-05-06T11:51:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-05-07T06:18:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":920,"height":540,"url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/3.-SC-Dismisses-SLP-in-DEEC-Exemption-Case-After-IBC-Resolutio.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Centax","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Centax","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution"},"author":{"name":"Centax","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f4400180c72e79f30e22a263f2d8fd0a"},"headline":"SC Dismisses SLP in DEEC Exemption Case After IBC Resolution","datePublished":"2026-05-06T11:51:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-07T06:18:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution"},"wordCount":359,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/3.-SC-Dismisses-SLP-in-DEEC-Exemption-Case-After-IBC-Resolutio.jpg","articleSection":["Customs","News","Case Chronicles"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution","name":"SC Dismisses SLP in DEEC Exemption Case After IBC Resolution","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/3.-SC-Dismisses-SLP-in-DEEC-Exemption-Case-After-IBC-Resolutio.jpg","datePublished":"2026-05-06T11:51:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-07T06:18:48+00:00","description":"SC dismisses Revenue SLP in DEEC exemption dispute as assessee stood resolved under IBC; mixed input use accepted by HC.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/3.-SC-Dismisses-SLP-in-DEEC-Exemption-Case-After-IBC-Resolutio.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/3.-SC-Dismisses-SLP-in-DEEC-Exemption-Case-After-IBC-Resolutio.jpg","width":920,"height":540,"caption":"DEEC scheme exemption"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/sc-dismisses-slp-in-deec-exemption-case-after-ibc-resolution#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"SC Dismisses SLP in DEEC Exemption Case After IBC Resolution"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/","name":"Centax-Blogs","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Centax-Blogs","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp","width":536,"height":133,"caption":"Centax-Blogs"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f4400180c72e79f30e22a263f2d8fd0a","name":"Centax","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/795c4221b76ac6ccc3cbba0cc63dd055?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/795c4221b76ac6ccc3cbba0cc63dd055?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Centax"},"url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/author\/centax-editorial-team"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8983","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/19"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8983"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8983\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8990,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8983\/revisions\/8990"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8989"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8983"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8983"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8983"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}