{"id":9309,"date":"2026-05-30T06:22:39","date_gmt":"2026-05-30T00:52:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?p=9309"},"modified":"2026-05-30T06:22:39","modified_gmt":"2026-05-30T00:52:39","slug":"refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc","title":{"rendered":"Refund Proceedings Based on Omitted Rule 96(10) Quashed Without Saving Clause | HC"},"content":{"rendered":"<pre><strong>Case Details: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/latest-news-updates\/gst\/101010000000420576\/rule-9610-omission-without-saving-clause-vitiates-refund-proceedings-orders-quashed-hc\">Techno Waxchem Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India (2026) 42 Centax 433 (Cal.)<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong><\/pre>\n<h2><em>Judiciary and Counsel Details<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li><strong><span id=\"111170000000042139\">Raja Basu Chowdhury<\/span><\/strong>, J.<\/li>\n<li><strong>S\/Shri Vinay Kumar Shraff<\/strong>, <strong>Harsh Gadodia<\/strong> &amp; <strong>Dev Kumar Agarwal<\/strong>, for the Petitioner.<\/li>\n<li><strong>S\/Shri Bhaskar Prosad Banerjee<\/strong>, T<strong>apan Bhanja<\/strong>, <strong>Tanoy Chakraborty<\/strong>, <strong>Partha Sarathi Banerjee<\/strong> &amp; <strong>Saptak Sanyal<\/strong>, for the Respondent.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><em>Facts of the Case<\/em><\/h2>\n<p>The petitioner, a GST-registered exporter, procured duty-free inputs under the Advance Authorisation Scheme and exported goods as zero-rated supplies. Refunds of IGST were granted against ICEGATE shipping bills. Subsequently, the department alleged a violation of Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules on the ground that the petitioner had availed a refund despite procuring duty-free inputs under Advance Authorisation. Based on this, the department issued a SCN under section 74 of the CGST Act. The Proper Officer confirmed the demand under section 74(9) and issued DRC-07. The petitioner challenged these proceedings before the High Court, contending that Rule 96(10) had been omitted by Notification No. 20\/2024, dated 08-10-2024, without any saving clause. Therefore, proceedings based solely on the omitted rule could not survive.<\/p>\n<h2><em>High Court Held<\/em><\/h2>\n<p>The High Court held that the entire proceedings rested exclusively on the alleged contravention of Rule 96(10). It was observed that Rule 96(10) stood omitted without any saving clause. Therefore, proceedings founded solely on the said rule could not continue after its omission. The High Court further observed that section 6 of the General Clauses Act applies to the repeal of a Central Act or Regulation, and not to the omission of rules. Since the proceedings and orders were based only on the omitted rule, they no longer survived after the omission of Rule 96(10). Accordingly, the order-in-original and consequential proceedings were quashed.<\/p>\n<h2><em>List of Cases Cited<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"list-style-type: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=(2025)%2031%20Centax%20274%20(Guj.)%2F2025%20(98)%20G.S.T.L.%20241%20(Guj.)%20%5B13-06-2025%5D&amp;itemType=AP\">Addwrap Packaging (P.) Ltd. v. UOI<\/a> \u2014 [2025] 175 taxmann.com 592 (Gujarat) = 2025 110 GST 736 (Gujarat) = 2025 98 G.S.T.L. 241 (Gujarat) \u2014 Followed [Para 31]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=(2025)%2034%20Centax%20249%20(Bom.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Hikal Ltd. v. UOI<\/a> \u2014 (2025) 34 Centax 249 (Bom.) \u2014 Followed [Para 31]<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=2000%20(119)%20E.L.T.%20257%20(S.C.)&amp;itemType=AP\">Kolhapur Canesugar Works Ltd. v. UOI<\/a> \u2014 2000 (119) E.L.T. 257 (S.C.) \u2014 Referred [Para 20]<\/li>\n<li>Rayala Corporation (P) Ltd. and M.R. Pratap v. Director of Enforcement \u2014 (1969) 2 SCC 412 \u2014 Referred [Para 20]<\/li>\n<li>Vinayak International Housewares Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India W. P. (C) 3154\/2023, W. P. (C) 10687\/2023 &amp; CMAPPL. 41448\/2023, W. P. (C) 3165\/2023 decided on 20th November, 2025 \u2014 Followed [Para 31]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><em>List of Notifications Cited<\/em><\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/search?searchData=Notification%20No.%2020%2F2024&amp;itemType=AP\">Notification No. 20\/2024<\/a> dated 8th October, 2024<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Case Details: Techno Waxchem Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India (2026) 42&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":19,"featured_media":9311,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[37,60,189],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9309","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gst","category-news","category-gst-case-chronicles"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Refund Proceedings Based on Omitted Rule 96(10) Quashed Without Saving Clause | HC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"HC quashes GST refund proceedings as omitted Rule 96(10), without a saving clause, could not sustain Section 74 action.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Refund Proceedings Based on Omitted Rule 96(10) Quashed Without Saving Clause | HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"HC quashes GST refund proceedings as omitted Rule 96(10), without a saving clause, could not sustain Section 74 action.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Centax-Blogs\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-30T00:52:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/2.-Refund-Proceedings-Based-on-Omitted-Rule-9610-Quashed-Without-Saving-Clause-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"540\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Centax\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Centax\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Centax\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f4400180c72e79f30e22a263f2d8fd0a\"},\"headline\":\"Refund Proceedings Based on Omitted Rule 96(10) Quashed Without Saving Clause | HC\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-30T00:52:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc\"},\"wordCount\":368,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/2.-Refund-Proceedings-Based-on-Omitted-Rule-9610-Quashed-Without-Saving-Clause-HC.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"GST\",\"News\",\"Case Chronicles\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc\",\"name\":\"Refund Proceedings Based on Omitted Rule 96(10) Quashed Without Saving Clause | HC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/2.-Refund-Proceedings-Based-on-Omitted-Rule-9610-Quashed-Without-Saving-Clause-HC.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-30T00:52:39+00:00\",\"description\":\"HC quashes GST refund proceedings as omitted Rule 96(10), without a saving clause, could not sustain Section 74 action.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/2.-Refund-Proceedings-Based-on-Omitted-Rule-9610-Quashed-Without-Saving-Clause-HC.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/2.-Refund-Proceedings-Based-on-Omitted-Rule-9610-Quashed-Without-Saving-Clause-HC.jpg\",\"width\":920,\"height\":540,\"caption\":\"Rule 96(10) omission\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Refund Proceedings Based on Omitted Rule 96(10) Quashed Without Saving Clause | HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Centax-Blogs\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Centax-Blogs\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp\",\"width\":536,\"height\":133,\"caption\":\"Centax-Blogs\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f4400180c72e79f30e22a263f2d8fd0a\",\"name\":\"Centax\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/795c4221b76ac6ccc3cbba0cc63dd055?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/795c4221b76ac6ccc3cbba0cc63dd055?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Centax\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/author\/centax-editorial-team\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Refund Proceedings Based on Omitted Rule 96(10) Quashed Without Saving Clause | HC","description":"HC quashes GST refund proceedings as omitted Rule 96(10), without a saving clause, could not sustain Section 74 action.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Refund Proceedings Based on Omitted Rule 96(10) Quashed Without Saving Clause | HC","og_description":"HC quashes GST refund proceedings as omitted Rule 96(10), without a saving clause, could not sustain Section 74 action.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc","og_site_name":"Centax-Blogs","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia","article_published_time":"2026-05-30T00:52:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":920,"height":540,"url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/2.-Refund-Proceedings-Based-on-Omitted-Rule-9610-Quashed-Without-Saving-Clause-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Centax","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Centax","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc"},"author":{"name":"Centax","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f4400180c72e79f30e22a263f2d8fd0a"},"headline":"Refund Proceedings Based on Omitted Rule 96(10) Quashed Without Saving Clause | HC","datePublished":"2026-05-30T00:52:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc"},"wordCount":368,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/2.-Refund-Proceedings-Based-on-Omitted-Rule-9610-Quashed-Without-Saving-Clause-HC.jpg","articleSection":["GST","News","Case Chronicles"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc","name":"Refund Proceedings Based on Omitted Rule 96(10) Quashed Without Saving Clause | HC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/2.-Refund-Proceedings-Based-on-Omitted-Rule-9610-Quashed-Without-Saving-Clause-HC.jpg","datePublished":"2026-05-30T00:52:39+00:00","description":"HC quashes GST refund proceedings as omitted Rule 96(10), without a saving clause, could not sustain Section 74 action.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/2.-Refund-Proceedings-Based-on-Omitted-Rule-9610-Quashed-Without-Saving-Clause-HC.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/2.-Refund-Proceedings-Based-on-Omitted-Rule-9610-Quashed-Without-Saving-Clause-HC.jpg","width":920,"height":540,"caption":"Rule 96(10) omission"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/refund-proceedings-based-on-omitted-rule-9610-quashed-without-saving-clause-hc#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Refund Proceedings Based on Omitted Rule 96(10) Quashed Without Saving Clause | HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/","name":"Centax-Blogs","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"Centax-Blogs","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/CNETAX-LOGO-1.webp","width":536,"height":133,"caption":"Centax-Blogs"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/centaxindia"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/f4400180c72e79f30e22a263f2d8fd0a","name":"Centax","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/795c4221b76ac6ccc3cbba0cc63dd055?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/795c4221b76ac6ccc3cbba0cc63dd055?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Centax"},"url":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/author\/centax-editorial-team"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9309","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/19"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9309"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9309\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9312,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9309\/revisions\/9312"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9311"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9309"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9309"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.centaxonline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9309"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}