Service Tax Can’t Be Demanded Under Supply of Tangible Goods as Transporting Ready-Mix Concrete Through Transit Mixers is a GTA Service | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

GTA Service Classification
Case Details: GUNESH LOGISTICS Versus COMMISSIONER OF CGST & CENTRAL EXCISE, JAIPUR- (2025) 26 Centax 324 (Tri.-Del)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Justice Dilip Gupta, President & Shri P.V. Subba Rao, Member (T)
  • Ms Poorvi Asati, Adv., for the Appellant.
  • Ms Jaya Kumari, Authorized Representative (DR), for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The appellant was engaged in transporting Ready-Mix Concrete (RMC) using its own vehicles. It entered into agreements with customers to transport RMC and issued consignment notes for each trip, billing based on quantity and distance. The department issued show-cause notices alleging that the appellant was providing a supply of tangible goods service (specifically, transit mixers) and that the activity resembled vehicle leasing, for which service tax was due. The appellant argued that it was providing GTA services, not leasing vehicles or supplying tangible goods. The adjudicating authority upheld the demand for service tax, and the appellant’s appeals were dismissed. The appellant had previously received a favourable ruling for the period 2009-2013 in a case involving similar facts. The appellant then brought the issue before the Tribunal.

CESTAT Held

The Honourable Tribunal, after considering the facts and submissions, ruled in favour of the appellant. It observed that the appellant was engaged in the transportation of RMC using its own vehicles as per the work orders. The Tribunal clarified that the appellant’s activity was not the supply of tangible goods or vehicle leasing, but instead, it was correctly classified as a transportation service under the Goods Transport Agency (GTA) category. The earlier ruling in favour of the appellant for the period 2009-2013 was upheld, and the demand for service tax, along with penalties, was set aside.

List of Cases Cited

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
SC Dismisses Appeal, Upholds HC Order Limiting Cenvat Credit Use

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

September 17, 2025

Maintenance Reimbursements Not Part of Renting Service | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

September 12, 2025

Construction Agreements With Landowners Are Works Contract | SC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

September 12, 2025

Market Support Services to Foreign Entity Treated as Export: CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

September 10, 2025

Lease of Land for Port and Marine Activities Attracts Service Tax | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

September 8, 2025

Services to Foreign Client for Market Promotion Qualify as Export | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

September 5, 2025

Installing Software With COA Stickers Is Sale—Not Service | SC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

September 5, 2025

SC Rules Freight Collected by Agents Not Taxable

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

August 30, 2025

Service Tax Demand Invalid When Trade Discounts Passed On | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

August 28, 2025

CGST Officers Can Pursue Pending Service Tax Matters | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

August 22, 2025