Writ Petition Dismissed Over ITC Fraud and Lack of Clean Hands | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

ITC Fraud
Case Details: Aushta Enterprises Versus Union of India (2025) 31 Centax 219 (Del.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Pratibha M. Singh & Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, JJ.
  • Shri Sanjeev Anand, Sr. Adv., Ms Madhumita Singh & Ms Monica, Advs. for the Petitioner.
  • S/Shri Vinay Yadav, SPC, Ms Kamna Behrani, Ansh Kalra, Divyanshu Sinha, Dipak Raj, Subham Kumar, Ms Garima Kumar, Advs. & Anurag Ojha, SSC for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

M/s Aushta Enterprises, involved in fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims through fake invoices, filed a writ petition challenging the denial of ITC. The company argued that they had not received the Show Cause Notice (SCN) or hearing notices, claiming a violation of natural justice. The petitioner, despite being aware of the investigation, failed to respond to the notices, attend hearings, or provide any proof of legitimate sales or transportation of goods. The Department presented evidence of email communications sent to the petitioner, but the petitioner claimed the emails went to the junk folder.

High Court Held

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that there was no violation of natural justice. The petitioner had been aware of the investigation and had multiple opportunities to respond but chose not to engage. The Court noted that the emails and hearing notices were indeed sent, and the petitioner’s failure to attend hearings and provide any explanations or evidence demonstrated lack of bona fides. The Court also emphasized that factual adjudication was required, which could not be conducted in writ jurisdiction. The petitioner was allowed to approach the Appellate Authority under Section 107 of the CGST Act for adjudication on merits, and the writ petition was dismissed.

List of Cases Cited

  • Asstt. Commissioner of State Tax v. Commercial Steel Ltd. — 2021 (52) G.S.T.L. 385 (S.C.) — Referred [Para 15]
  • Sheetal and Sons v. Union of India — [W.P. (C) No. 6441 of 2025, dated 15-5-2025] — Referred [Para 6]
  • Sunny Jagga v. Union of India — [W.P. (C) No. 6443 of 2025, dated 15-5-2025] — Referred [Para 6]
  • Vikas Traders v. Union of India — [W.P. (C) No. 6449 of 2025, dated 15-5-2025] — Referred [Para 6]

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
Writ Against Section 74 Consolidated GST Order Not Maintainable | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

November 5, 2025

HC Quashes GST Demand Order for Denial of Hearing | Fresh Notice Directed

GST • News • Case Chronicles

November 4, 2025

Recovery During GST Search Without SCN Held Illegal—Refund with Interest Ordered | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

November 4, 2025

Copy of CGST (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2025

GST • News • Statutory Scope

November 3, 2025

GSTN Launches ‘Import of Goods’ Module in IMS from Oct 2025

GST • News • Statutory Scope

November 1, 2025

GSTN Bars Filing of GST Returns Beyond 3 Years From Due Date

GST • News • Statutory Scope

October 31, 2025

CBIC Defines Officer Jurisdiction and Monetary Limits for SCNs and Orders Under CGST Act

GST • News • Statutory Scope

October 30, 2025

HC Quashes ITC Demand Order Passed Without Hearing After GST Cancellation

GST • News • Case Chronicles

October 29, 2025

HC Dismisses Writ for Delay in Challenging Order Before Filing Refund Claim

GST • News • Case Chronicles

October 28, 2025

HC Remands Case Over Inconsistent Refund Orders Passed on Similar Facts

GST • News • Case Chronicles

October 28, 2025