Writ Petition Dismissed Over ITC Fraud and Lack of Clean Hands | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

ITC Fraud
Case Details: Aushta Enterprises Versus Union of India (2025) 31 Centax 219 (Del.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Pratibha M. Singh & Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, JJ.
  • Shri Sanjeev Anand, Sr. Adv., Ms Madhumita Singh & Ms Monica, Advs. for the Petitioner.
  • S/Shri Vinay Yadav, SPC, Ms Kamna Behrani, Ansh Kalra, Divyanshu Sinha, Dipak Raj, Subham Kumar, Ms Garima Kumar, Advs. & Anurag Ojha, SSC for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

M/s Aushta Enterprises, involved in fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims through fake invoices, filed a writ petition challenging the denial of ITC. The company argued that they had not received the Show Cause Notice (SCN) or hearing notices, claiming a violation of natural justice. The petitioner, despite being aware of the investigation, failed to respond to the notices, attend hearings, or provide any proof of legitimate sales or transportation of goods. The Department presented evidence of email communications sent to the petitioner, but the petitioner claimed the emails went to the junk folder.

High Court Held

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, ruling that there was no violation of natural justice. The petitioner had been aware of the investigation and had multiple opportunities to respond but chose not to engage. The Court noted that the emails and hearing notices were indeed sent, and the petitioner’s failure to attend hearings and provide any explanations or evidence demonstrated lack of bona fides. The Court also emphasized that factual adjudication was required, which could not be conducted in writ jurisdiction. The petitioner was allowed to approach the Appellate Authority under Section 107 of the CGST Act for adjudication on merits, and the writ petition was dismissed.

List of Cases Cited

  • Asstt. Commissioner of State Tax v. Commercial Steel Ltd. — 2021 (52) G.S.T.L. 385 (S.C.) — Referred [Para 15]
  • Sheetal and Sons v. Union of India — [W.P. (C) No. 6441 of 2025, dated 15-5-2025] — Referred [Para 6]
  • Sunny Jagga v. Union of India — [W.P. (C) No. 6443 of 2025, dated 15-5-2025] — Referred [Para 6]
  • Vikas Traders v. Union of India — [W.P. (C) No. 6449 of 2025, dated 15-5-2025] — Referred [Para 6]

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
HC Restores GST Registration Subject to Filing Returns and Clearing Dues

GST • News • Case Chronicles

September 17, 2025

GST on Post-Sale Discounts – CBIC Circular 251/2025 Clarification

GST • News • Statutory Scope

September 16, 2025

HC Rules Proceedings Against Deceased Assessee A Nullity

GST • News • Case Chronicles

September 15, 2025

Writ Admission Without Interim Order Does Not Halt GST Proceedings | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

September 12, 2025

GSTN Prohibits Filing of GST Returns After Three Years From Due Date

GST • News • Statutory Scope

September 12, 2025

New GST Rates to Impact Heavy Industries and Related Sectors

GST • News • Statutory Scope

September 10, 2025

Bauxite Handling for SEZ Unit Treated as Zero-Rated Supply | AAR

GST • News • Case Chronicles

September 9, 2025

Matter Remanded as SCN Uploaded Without Assessee’s Knowledge| HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

September 8, 2025

Detailed Analysis of 56th GST Council Meeting Outcomes

GST • News • Legal Beacon

September 6, 2025

FAQs on 56th GST Council Meeting Decisions Released by Govt

GST • News • Statutory Scope

September 5, 2025