HC Dismisses Writ for Delay in Challenging Order Before Filing Refund Claim

GST • News • Case Chronicles

Case Details: Moms Cradle Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India (2025) 35 Centax 198 (Del.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Prathiba M. Singh & Shail Jain, JJ.
  • S/Shri Ritaj Kacker, Deepansh Dhanija & Ms Divya Rastogi, Adv., for the Petitioner.
  • Shri Ruchesh Sinha, SSC & Ms Upasana Vashishtha, Adv., for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner, a company engaged in export of goods on payment of IGST, had filed a refund claim which was initially rejected by the jurisdictional authority under CGST. Pursuant to directions of the Delhi High Court in an earlier writ, the department reconsidered the matter and again rejected the claim, against which the petitioner filed an appeal. The Appellate Authority partly allowed the appeal. The petitioner contended that the remaining refund was not released and sought permission to file an appeal against a subsequent demand order alleging fraudulent availment of ITC, stating that the order had not come to its knowledge within the limitation period. It was further submitted that the refund sanctioned by the Appellate Authority may be adjusted as pre-deposit for filing the proposed appeal. The Department of Revenue argued that the petitioner had duly participated in the proceedings and that the refund was being withheld in view of the subsisting demand order. The matter was accordingly placed before the Delhi High Court.

High Court Held

The Delhi High Court held that there was no violation of the principles of natural justice, as the petitioner had participated in the proceedings culminating in the demand order. It was observed that the petitioner failed to file an appeal within the prescribed limitation period and that such delay could not be condoned in exercise of writ jurisdiction.As regards the refund, it was directed that the amount allowed by the Appellate Authority be adjusted against the demand raised under the said order. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed.

List of Cases Cited

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
Common Director Not Ground to Lift Corporate Veil | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

January 31, 2026

GST Appeal Allowed Despite Delay Due to Illness | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

January 30, 2026

HC Orders Reconsideration of Excess ITC Denial on Imports

GST • News • Case Chronicles

January 30, 2026

Bail Granted After Prolonged Custody Before Trial | SC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

January 29, 2026

Refund Cannot Be Rejected After Eligibility Accepted | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

January 28, 2026

GSTN Advisory On RSP Based Valuation Of Tobacco Under GST

GST • News • Statutory Scope

January 27, 2026

Writ Not Maintainable Against SCN Under GST | SC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

January 24, 2026

Writ Not Maintainable Against SCN Under Section 74 | SC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

January 23, 2026

Refund Of Statutory Pre-Deposit Becomes Vested Right | SC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

January 22, 2026

Email Service Of Hearing Notices Valid Under Sec. 169 | SC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

January 21, 2026