Bail Granted in Bogus Supply Tax Evasion Case | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

Bail in Bogus Supply Tax Evasion
Case Details: Kishor Kumar Moolani Versus State of Rajasthan (2025) 32 Centax 141 (Raj.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Maneesh Sharma (V. J.), J.
  • Shri Martand Pratap Singh for the Petitioner.
  • S/Shri Rajesh Choudhary, Amit Kumar Gupta, GA-cum-AAGs & M.S. Shekhawat, PP for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner, acting as an assessee, was arrested for alleged tax evasion involving bogus supply, under Section 69 read with Section 132 of the CGST Act and the Rajasthan GST Act. The petitioner had remained in judicial custody for two and a half months. It was contended that the charge-sheet had already been filed and the evidence relied upon by the jurisdictional officer under CGST would primarily be documentary and electronic in nature. The petitioner submitted that any ocular evidence would be from official witnesses only, thereby eliminating the apprehension of tampering with, intimidating, or influencing witnesses. The petitioner further submitted that, considering the stage of proceedings and the nature of evidence, continued judicial custody was unwarranted. The issue was whether, in such circumstances, the petitioner was entitled to be released on bail, and the matter was accordingly placed before the High Court of Rajasthan.

High Court Held

The High Court of Rajasthan held that the petitioner was entitled to bail, observing that the charge-sheet had already been filed, the evidence was primarily documentary and electronic, and any ocular evidence would only be through official witnesses, ruling out any risk of tampering or undue influence. The Court further noted that the trial might take considerable time and granted bail without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. The Court held that, in view of the facts and circumstances, the bail application deserved to be allowed. The petitions were allowed in favour of the assessee.

List of Cases Cited

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
HC Quashes GST Demand Order for Denial of Hearing | Fresh Notice Directed

GST • News • Case Chronicles

November 4, 2025

Recovery During GST Search Without SCN Held Illegal—Refund with Interest Ordered | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

November 4, 2025

Copy of CGST (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2025

GST • News • Statutory Scope

November 3, 2025

GSTN Launches ‘Import of Goods’ Module in IMS from Oct 2025

GST • News • Statutory Scope

November 1, 2025

GSTN Bars Filing of GST Returns Beyond 3 Years From Due Date

GST • News • Statutory Scope

October 31, 2025

CBIC Defines Officer Jurisdiction and Monetary Limits for SCNs and Orders Under CGST Act

GST • News • Statutory Scope

October 30, 2025

HC Quashes ITC Demand Order Passed Without Hearing After GST Cancellation

GST • News • Case Chronicles

October 29, 2025

HC Dismisses Writ for Delay in Challenging Order Before Filing Refund Claim

GST • News • Case Chronicles

October 28, 2025

HC Remands Case Over Inconsistent Refund Orders Passed on Similar Facts

GST • News • Case Chronicles

October 28, 2025

HC Upholds GST Goods Detention for Missing Documents at Interception

GST • News • Case Chronicles

October 27, 2025