Bail Granted in Bogus Supply Tax Evasion Case | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

Bail in Bogus Supply Tax Evasion
Case Details: Kishor Kumar Moolani Versus State of Rajasthan (2025) 32 Centax 141 (Raj.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Maneesh Sharma (V. J.), J.
  • Shri Martand Pratap Singh for the Petitioner.
  • S/Shri Rajesh Choudhary, Amit Kumar Gupta, GA-cum-AAGs & M.S. Shekhawat, PP for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner, acting as an assessee, was arrested for alleged tax evasion involving bogus supply, under Section 69 read with Section 132 of the CGST Act and the Rajasthan GST Act. The petitioner had remained in judicial custody for two and a half months. It was contended that the charge-sheet had already been filed and the evidence relied upon by the jurisdictional officer under CGST would primarily be documentary and electronic in nature. The petitioner submitted that any ocular evidence would be from official witnesses only, thereby eliminating the apprehension of tampering with, intimidating, or influencing witnesses. The petitioner further submitted that, considering the stage of proceedings and the nature of evidence, continued judicial custody was unwarranted. The issue was whether, in such circumstances, the petitioner was entitled to be released on bail, and the matter was accordingly placed before the High Court of Rajasthan.

High Court Held

The High Court of Rajasthan held that the petitioner was entitled to bail, observing that the charge-sheet had already been filed, the evidence was primarily documentary and electronic, and any ocular evidence would only be through official witnesses, ruling out any risk of tampering or undue influence. The Court further noted that the trial might take considerable time and granted bail without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. The Court held that, in view of the facts and circumstances, the bail application deserved to be allowed. The petitions were allowed in favour of the assessee.

List of Cases Cited

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
GSTN Upgrades GSTR-3B Interest and Tax Reporting from Jan 2026

GST • News • Statutory Scope

February 1, 2026

Common Director Not Ground to Lift Corporate Veil | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

January 31, 2026

GST Appeal Allowed Despite Delay Due to Illness | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

January 30, 2026

HC Orders Reconsideration of Excess ITC Denial on Imports

GST • News • Case Chronicles

January 30, 2026

Bail Granted After Prolonged Custody Before Trial | SC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

January 29, 2026

Refund Cannot Be Rejected After Eligibility Accepted | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

January 28, 2026

GSTN Advisory On RSP Based Valuation Of Tobacco Under GST

GST • News • Statutory Scope

January 27, 2026

Writ Not Maintainable Against SCN Under GST | SC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

January 24, 2026

Writ Not Maintainable Against SCN Under Section 74 | SC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

January 23, 2026

Refund Of Statutory Pre-Deposit Becomes Vested Right | SC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

January 22, 2026