Bail Granted in Bogus Supply Tax Evasion Case | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

Bail in Bogus Supply Tax Evasion
Case Details: Kishor Kumar Moolani Versus State of Rajasthan (2025) 32 Centax 141 (Raj.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Maneesh Sharma (V. J.), J.
  • Shri Martand Pratap Singh for the Petitioner.
  • S/Shri Rajesh Choudhary, Amit Kumar Gupta, GA-cum-AAGs & M.S. Shekhawat, PP for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner, acting as an assessee, was arrested for alleged tax evasion involving bogus supply, under Section 69 read with Section 132 of the CGST Act and the Rajasthan GST Act. The petitioner had remained in judicial custody for two and a half months. It was contended that the charge-sheet had already been filed and the evidence relied upon by the jurisdictional officer under CGST would primarily be documentary and electronic in nature. The petitioner submitted that any ocular evidence would be from official witnesses only, thereby eliminating the apprehension of tampering with, intimidating, or influencing witnesses. The petitioner further submitted that, considering the stage of proceedings and the nature of evidence, continued judicial custody was unwarranted. The issue was whether, in such circumstances, the petitioner was entitled to be released on bail, and the matter was accordingly placed before the High Court of Rajasthan.

High Court Held

The High Court of Rajasthan held that the petitioner was entitled to bail, observing that the charge-sheet had already been filed, the evidence was primarily documentary and electronic, and any ocular evidence would only be through official witnesses, ruling out any risk of tampering or undue influence. The Court further noted that the trial might take considerable time and granted bail without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. The Court held that, in view of the facts and circumstances, the bail application deserved to be allowed. The petitions were allowed in favour of the assessee.

List of Cases Cited

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
No GST on Assignment of Leasehold Rights in Immovable Property | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

July 16, 2025

HC Quashes ECL Blocking Order Passed Without Hearing

GST • News • Case Chronicles

July 15, 2025

HC Quashes Credit Ledger Block for Lack of Hearing and Reasons

GST • News • Case Chronicles

July 15, 2025

Overseas Supply via Direct Shipment Not a Supply Under GST | AAR

GST • News • Case Chronicles

July 11, 2025

Customs-Related Queries Not Maintainable Under GST | Gujarat AAR

GST • News • Case Chronicles

July 10, 2025

Unvalidated Cancer Tests Not Exempt as Healthcare Services | AAR

GST • News • Case Chronicles

July 9, 2025

Barter of Silver Scrap for Ornaments Is Taxable Under GST | AAR

GST • News • Case Chronicles

July 8, 2025

GST Penalty Quashed for Denial of Fair Hearing | Allahabad HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

July 8, 2025

No GST Interest If Cash Ledger Credited on Time | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

July 8, 2025

No Rule 86B Relief if No Partner Paid ₹1L Tax | AAR

GST • News • Case Chronicles

July 6, 2025