Appeal Maintainable in HC if Issue is Breach of Duty Exemption Condition | SC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

Appeal Maintainable Duty Exemption Condition SC
Case Details: Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore Versus Lanyard Foods Ltd. (2025) 33 Centax 392 (S.C.) 

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Manoj Misra & Sandeep Mehta, JJ.
  • S/Shri Rupesh Kumar, Sr Adv., S. Dwarakanath, A.S.G., Prashant Singh-II, Nachiketa Joshi, Raman Yadav, Rajat Vaishnaw, Mudit Bansal, S. Vijay Adithya, S.Jaikumar, Kartik Jindal, Anant Gautam, Rishi Chauhan, Advs., Gurmeet Singh Makker & Rajesh Kumar Gautam, AOR’s for the Appellant

Facts of the Case

The appellant-Revenue filed appeals against orders of CESTAT involving a dispute as to violation of post-import conditions of exemption Notification No. 30/97-Customs, Dated 01-04-1997 by the respondent-assessee, who had not utilized imported materials for manufacture of the declared final product. The Karnataka High Court had dismissed the Revenue’s appeals as not maintainable under Section 130 of Customs Act. The appellant then approached the Supreme Court, submitting that the issue solely involved breach of post-import conditions for exemption from duty and, therefore, the appeals were maintainable before the High Court. The legal issue was whether appeals against CESTAT orders concerning violation of post-import conditions for exemption could be entertained by the High Court. 

Supreme Court Held

The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that since the appeals involved only breach of conditions imposed by the exemption notification and not determination of duty rates or coverage under the notification, they were maintainable before the High Court. The Court relied on its decision in Motorola India Ltd. [2019 (368) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.) to confirm that such disputes fall within the appellate jurisdiction of High Courts. By invoking extraordinary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, the SC quashed the High Court order dismissing the appeals as not maintainable and directed restoration of the appeals to their original numbers for adjudication as per law. 

List of Cases Cited 

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
No Export Duty on Iron Ore Fines Below 58% Fe | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 31, 2026

NDPS Case | SC Allows Interim Release of Foreign Vessel

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 30, 2026

Government Revises Tariff Values For Edible Oils, Gold And Silver

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

January 29, 2026

Gold Smuggling Via Diplomatic Cargo Leads To Licence Revocation | SC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 28, 2026

Commercial Frying System Classifiable Under HSN 8438 | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 24, 2026

Namkeen Frying System Classifiable Under HSN 8438 | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 23, 2026

Customs Can’t Alter FOB Or Recompute Drawback | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 22, 2026

CBL Regulations Breach, Licence Revocation Set Aside, Penalty Upheld

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 21, 2026

CBIC Grants One-Time QCO Exemption For Cross Recessed Screws

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

January 20, 2026

RoSCTL Benefits Extended To Postal Exports Via E-Entry

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

January 19, 2026