Appeal Maintainable in HC if Issue is Breach of Duty Exemption Condition | SC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

Appeal Maintainable Duty Exemption Condition SC
Case Details: Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore Versus Lanyard Foods Ltd. (2025) 33 Centax 392 (S.C.) 

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Manoj Misra & Sandeep Mehta, JJ.
  • S/Shri Rupesh Kumar, Sr Adv., S. Dwarakanath, A.S.G., Prashant Singh-II, Nachiketa Joshi, Raman Yadav, Rajat Vaishnaw, Mudit Bansal, S. Vijay Adithya, S.Jaikumar, Kartik Jindal, Anant Gautam, Rishi Chauhan, Advs., Gurmeet Singh Makker & Rajesh Kumar Gautam, AOR’s for the Appellant

Facts of the Case

The appellant-Revenue filed appeals against orders of CESTAT involving a dispute as to violation of post-import conditions of exemption Notification No. 30/97-Customs, Dated 01-04-1997 by the respondent-assessee, who had not utilized imported materials for manufacture of the declared final product. The Karnataka High Court had dismissed the Revenue’s appeals as not maintainable under Section 130 of Customs Act. The appellant then approached the Supreme Court, submitting that the issue solely involved breach of post-import conditions for exemption from duty and, therefore, the appeals were maintainable before the High Court. The legal issue was whether appeals against CESTAT orders concerning violation of post-import conditions for exemption could be entertained by the High Court. 

Supreme Court Held

The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that since the appeals involved only breach of conditions imposed by the exemption notification and not determination of duty rates or coverage under the notification, they were maintainable before the High Court. The Court relied on its decision in Motorola India Ltd. [2019 (368) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.) to confirm that such disputes fall within the appellate jurisdiction of High Courts. By invoking extraordinary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, the SC quashed the High Court order dismissing the appeals as not maintainable and directed restoration of the appeals to their original numbers for adjudication as per law. 

List of Cases Cited 

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
Polyester Bed Sheets Classified Under Heading 6304: CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

September 10, 2025

Gold Bars to Be Released to Bank on Provisional Basis | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

September 8, 2025

Metal-Core PCBs Classifiable as Printed Circuits Under CTH 8534 | SC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

September 6, 2025

Duty Liability Based on Original Bill of Entry Despite New Buyer | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

September 5, 2025

Denial of Cross-Examination in Smuggling Case Valid When No Prejudice | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

September 5, 2025

Exporter Must Ensure Goods Reach Focus Market to Claim FMS Benefit | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

September 3, 2025

SC Rejects Condonation of 295-Day Delay in Departmental Appeals

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

September 2, 2025

SC Upholds Exemption on Import of Single Unit Cells for Power Banks

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

September 2, 2025

DGFT Empowered to Cancel MEIS Scrips Beyond 24 Months | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

September 1, 2025

CBIC Issues Guidelines on Duties and KYC for Gifts via Courier

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

August 29, 2025