Repair and Maintenance of Foreign Ships at Indian Ports Treated as Export of Services | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

Case Details: Amar Marine Enterprises vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mangalore (2025) 35 Centax 189 (Tri.-Bang)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • P.A. Augustian, Member (J) & R. Bhagya Devi, Member (T)
  • Shri Pradyumna G.H., Advocate, for the Appellant.
  • Mrs Money Jain, Joint Commissioner (AR), for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The assessee was engaged in the repair and maintenance of ships. During the audit, it was observed that in respect of repair and maintenance carried out on foreign ships, since the payments are received in convertible foreign currency, service tax was not discharged by them. The matter reached the South Zonal Bench of CESTAT.

CESTAT Held

The Tribunal held that the assessee had undertaken repair and maintenance service of the foreign ships docked at the Indian Port. After repair, they leave the Indian Territorial Waters and enter the International Maritime Zone. It was also a fact that for the above repairs, payments were received in convertible foreign currency. Thus, the conditions laid down vide Rule 3(2) of the Export Service Rules read with the Board Circular No. 111/5/2009-S.T., dated 24.02.2009 and the clarification by TRU-141/10/2011, dated 13.05.2011 stands satisfied. The Circular states that “used outside India should be interpreted to mean that the benefit of the service should accrue outside India”.

List of Cases Cited

List of Departmental Clarification Cited

List of Notifications Cited

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
FA 2010 Service Tax Levy on Construction Upheld | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 31, 2026

Tobacco Products Assessable Under Section 4, Not 4A | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 28, 2026

Clandestine Removal Demand Set Aside For Lack Of Proof | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 27, 2026

No Review on Interest/Penalty If Duty Set Aside | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 24, 2026

Duty Demand Set Aside; Review Of Interest Penalty Invalid | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 23, 2026

Booking Speakers Via Agents Not Event Management | SC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 22, 2026

RCM Service Tax Refund Allowed Despite Registration Status | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 21, 2026

One-Day Delayed Payment Due To Tech Glitch Accepted | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 20, 2026

Chocolate-Coated Wafers Eligible For Concessional Duty | SC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 19, 2026

Adjudication Invalid After SVLDRS Acceptance | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

January 17, 2026