Repair and Maintenance of Foreign Ships at Indian Ports Treated as Export of Services | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

Case Details: Amar Marine Enterprises vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mangalore (2025) 35 Centax 189 (Tri.-Bang)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • P.A. Augustian, Member (J) & R. Bhagya Devi, Member (T)
  • Shri Pradyumna G.H., Advocate, for the Appellant.
  • Mrs Money Jain, Joint Commissioner (AR), for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The assessee was engaged in the repair and maintenance of ships. During the audit, it was observed that in respect of repair and maintenance carried out on foreign ships, since the payments are received in convertible foreign currency, service tax was not discharged by them. The matter reached the South Zonal Bench of CESTAT.

CESTAT Held

The Tribunal held that the assessee had undertaken repair and maintenance service of the foreign ships docked at the Indian Port. After repair, they leave the Indian Territorial Waters and enter the International Maritime Zone. It was also a fact that for the above repairs, payments were received in convertible foreign currency. Thus, the conditions laid down vide Rule 3(2) of the Export Service Rules read with the Board Circular No. 111/5/2009-S.T., dated 24.02.2009 and the clarification by TRU-141/10/2011, dated 13.05.2011 stands satisfied. The Circular states that “used outside India should be interpreted to mean that the benefit of the service should accrue outside India”.

List of Cases Cited

List of Departmental Clarification Cited

List of Notifications Cited

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
Rajasthan Housing Board Not a Governmental Authority – Service Tax Payable | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

December 15, 2025

Purchaser Gets ITC Even If Seller Fails to Remit Tax | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

December 10, 2025

Orders Invalid Without Examining Substantial Question of Law | SC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

December 6, 2025

SCN Invalid Without Mandatory Pre-Consultation | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

December 5, 2025

HC Remands Case to CESTAT to Consider Impact of NCLT-Approved Resolution Plan

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

December 4, 2025

Byozyme Classifiable as Fertiliser – Revenue Failed to Prove Plant Growth Promoter Claim | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

December 3, 2025

SC Dismisses Revenue Appeal | JNNURM Sewerage Works Not Taxable as Works Contract

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

December 2, 2025

Transport Without Consignment Note Not GTA Service | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

November 29, 2025

No Extra Excise Duty on Stock Transfer to Sister Unit Due to Revenue Neutrality | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

November 28, 2025

Reimbursed Lease Rent Not Part of Construction Service Value | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

November 27, 2025