Customs Dept. Directed to Release Bank Guarantee Withheld in Contravention of Earlier Order by the High Division Bench | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

Release of Bank Guarantee
Case Details: Om Gems and Jewellery Versus Deputy Commissioner of Customs (Import) (2025) 27 Centax 97 (Del.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Prathiba M. Singh & Dharmesh Sharma, JJ.
  • S/Shri Kishore Kunal, Ms Runjhun Pare & Jayesh Sitlani, Advs., for the Petitioner.
  • Shri Satish Aggarwala, Sr. Standing Counsel, for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner, an importer of gold jewellery from Indonesia, claimed an exemption under a customs notification granting a NIL rate of Basic Customs Duty (BCD). Upon importation, the authorities required the petitioner to furnish a 100% Bank Guarantee for differential BCD and pay Countervailing Duty (CVD). The petitioner complied, and the goods were released under provisional assessment. Despite multiple requests, the Customs Department did not finalize the assessment, prompting the petitioner to file a writ petition before the Delhi High Court. On 14th December 2023, the Court directed the Customs Department to release the Bank Guarantee and any retained funds, subject to the final assessment order. However, the Customs Department failed to comply. Subsequently, the final assessment order was passed, leading to further legal proceedings before the Delhi High Court.

High Court Held

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court held that the Division Bench’s judgment must be complied with, and the Customs Department could not withhold the release of the Bank Guarantee by adjusting it against the final assessment. The final assessment order was deemed appealable, and the petitioner was permitted to file an appeal against it within 30 days along with the requisite pre-deposit. The Court directed the Customs Department to release the Bank Guarantee with applicable interest forthwith, ensuring full compliance with the prior judicial ruling.

List of Cases Cited

List of Notifications Cited

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
No Penalty Under Section 114(iii) If Confiscation Is Set Aside | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

July 23, 2025

India Extends Anti-Dumping Duty on Aniline Imports from China

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

July 21, 2025

KYC Fulfilled by Verifying IEC and GSTIN | No Physical Check Needed—CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

July 19, 2025

CBIC Grants BIS Exemption for Steel Imports

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

July 17, 2025

Legal Heirs Not Liable for Customs Penalty After Assessee’s Death | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

July 16, 2025

Anti-Dumping Duty on Clear Float Glass Extended till Feb 2026

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

July 15, 2025

Mobile Chargers Not Part of Phones | Taxed Separately—HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

July 11, 2025

Gold Jewellery Worn by Foreign National Not Dutiable Baggage | Delhi HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

July 10, 2025

Declared Value Upheld as Black Pepper Import Ban Was Conditional | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

July 9, 2025

Importer Barred from Re-Litigating Pre-Deposit Issue | Delhi HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

July 8, 2025