HC Orders Refund of Service Tax on Ocean Freight

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

Service tax on ocean freight
Case Details: Shah Foils Ltd. vs. Union of India (2025) 36 Centax 107 (Guj.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Bhargav D. Karia & Pranav Trivedi, JJ.
  • Shri Anand Nainawati, Adv., for the Petitioner.
  • Shri Param V Shah, Adv., for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner-assessee was engaged in import of goods where transportation was undertaken by vessel from a place outside India up to the customs station of clearance in India, in respect of which service tax was paid on ocean freight under reverse charge pursuant to Notification No. 15/2017-ST, dated 13-04-2017, issued under section 68 of the Finance Act, 1994. The petitioner submitted that the levy of service tax on ocean freight under the impugned notification had already been struck down as ultra vires by a previous High Court judgment and, therefore, the collection lacked authority of law. It was contended that service tax paid pursuant to the said notification was liable to be refunded in accordance with section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, subject to verification of records. The matter was accordingly placed before the High Court.

High Court Held

The High Court held that Notification No. 15/2017-ST, dated 13-04-2017 levying service tax on transportation of goods by vessel from a place outside India up to the customs station of clearance in India, had already been declared ultra vires. It was held that service tax collected pursuant to a notification which had been struck down could not be retained by the authorities. The Court further held that the petitioner was entitled to refund of the service tax paid under the impugned notification, subject to verification of details under section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Accordingly, a direction was issued to refund the service tax paid by the petitioner after due verification, and the petition was allowed.

List of Cases Cited

  • Sal Steel Ltd v. Union of India — 2020 (37) G.S.T.L. 3 (Guj.) — Relied on [Para 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 5]
  • Kandla Port Steamship Agents Association — Special Civil Application Nos. 17804 of 2017 and 11626 of 2018, decided on 12-6-2024 by Gujarat High Court — Relied on [Paras 4.5, 5]
  • Torrent Power Ltd. v. Union of India (Special Civil Application No. 2748 of 2022) dated 25th April, 2022 — Relied on [Para 4.4]

List of Notifications Cited

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
Buyer’s Cenvat Credit Not Deniable if Supplier Paid Duty | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

December 30, 2025

Conduct of Exams for Affiliated Institutes Is Auxiliary Educational Service | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

December 26, 2025

Sales Tax Retained Under VAT Deferment Includible in Excise Value | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

December 22, 2025

Cenvat Credit Allowed on Captive Windmill Services | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

December 17, 2025

Fake Invoices and Bogus Suppliers Justify Denial of Credit | SC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

December 16, 2025

Rajasthan Housing Board Not a Governmental Authority – Service Tax Payable | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

December 15, 2025

Purchaser Gets ITC Even If Seller Fails to Remit Tax | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

December 10, 2025

Repair and Maintenance of Foreign Ships at Indian Ports Treated as Export of Services | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

December 8, 2025

Orders Invalid Without Examining Substantial Question of Law | SC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

December 6, 2025

SCN Invalid Without Mandatory Pre-Consultation | HC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

December 5, 2025