Refund of Transitional VAT Credit Barred Under Section 54(3) | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

Transitional VAT Credit Refund
Case Details: Dilip Babubhai Patel vs. State of Gujarat (2026) 44 Centax 23 (Guj.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • A.S. Supehia & Ms Vaibhavi  D. Namavati, JJ.
  • Shri Kuntal A. Parikh, for the Petitioner.
  • Shri Raj Tanna, AGP, for the Respondent

Facts of the Case

The assessee was engaged in the manufacture of wooden pallets and boxes. On the introduction of the GST regime, the unutilized VAT input tax credit lying under the erstwhile VAT regime was carried forward through TRAN-1 and credited to the Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL) under section 140 of the CGST Act. Thereafter, the assessee accumulated further ITC under the GST regime on account of an inverted tax structure and filed a refund claim under section 54(3), which included the transitioned VAT credit. The refund was partly sanctioned, while the balance attributable to the transitioned VAT credit was rejected by relying upon the second proviso to section 142(3). Aggrieved thereby, the assessee filed a writ petition before the High Court.

High Court Held

The High Court held that once VAT credit of the erstwhile regime had been transitioned to the ECL under section 140 of the CGST Act, refund of such transitioned credit under section 54(3) was barred by the second proviso to section 142(3). It held that section 54(3) permits refund only of ITC accumulated under the GST regime and not of credit transitioned from the erstwhile regime. However, the Court directed that the transitional VAT credit, the refund of which had been rejected, be re-credited to the ECL for future utilization in accordance with section 140. The petition was accordingly partly allowed.

List of Cases Cited

List of Departmental Clarifications Cited

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *