SC Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Prolonged Trial and Delay in Witness Examination

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

SC bail NDPS case
Case Details: Arunkumar Babukumar vs. Superintendent of Customs (2025) 34 Centax 433 (S.C.)  

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • J.K. Maheshwari & Vijay Bishnoi, JJ.
  • Shri G. Murugendran, Adv. & T. Harish Kumar, AOR, for the Petitioner
  • Ms. B. Sunita Rao, Adv. & Ms. Nisha Bagchi, AOR, for the Respondent

Facts of the Case

The petitioner, an accused in a case registered under Section 9A read with Sections 23, 25(A), 28 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, was arrested for alleged offences relating to smuggling in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. The petitioner continued to remain in judicial custody for more than three and a half years. It was submitted that despite the prolonged incarceration, the trial had not concluded and summons were still issued for examination of some of the witnesses. The petitioner sought bail under Section 439 of the erstwhile Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 read with Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, contending that further detention was unwarranted in view of the delay in completion of trial. The matter was accordingly placed before the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court held

The Supreme Court held that the petitioner, who had been in judicial custody for more than three and a half years for alleged offences under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, was to be released on bail. The Court observed that the trial was still pending, with summons issued for examination of some witnesses, indicating that its conclusion would take considerable time. Considering the period of incarceration and the stage of proceedings, the Court directed that the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing suitable bail bonds and sureties and on such other terms and conditions as deemed fit by the Trial Court. The Special Leave Petition was accordingly allowed in favour of the petitioner.

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
Order Set Aside as Successor Officer Passed Order Without Hearing | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

October 24, 2025

Telephonic Recall of Cleared Goods Without SCN Is Unlawful | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

October 18, 2025

SC Clears Vantara of Animal Smuggling and Laundering Allegations

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

October 16, 2025

CBIC Launches Online LOC Portal with Designation-based Logins

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

October 15, 2025

Government Revises Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold & Silver

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

October 14, 2025

Customs Must Release Jewellery If SCN Not Issued in One Year | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

October 9, 2025

HC Orders Release of Personal Jewellery Without Storage Charges

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

October 9, 2025

SCN Valid If Issued Within Six Months, Even If Delivered Later

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

October 7, 2025

MoF Notifies Origin Rules Under India–EFTA TEPA 2025

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

October 4, 2025

HC Rules Gifted Gold Jewellery Worn by Passenger Not Seizable

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

October 3, 2025