Service Tax Exemption Granted for Vocational Training in Business, Fashion, Advertising, Graphic Design, Media, Hospitality, and Hospital Administration | SC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

Service Tax Exemption
Case Details: Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi Versus WLC College India Ltd. (2025) 27 Centax 208 (S.C.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Abhay S. Oka & Ujjal Bhuyan, JJ.
  • Ms Nisha Bagchi, Sr. Adv., S/Shri V.C. Bharathi, Ms Astha Singh, Ms Satvika Thakur, Advs. & Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR, for the Appellant.
  • Ms Ashwini Chandrasekaran, Ms Priyanka Rathi, Ms Priyanshi Chakraborty, Ms Shubhangi Gupta, Advs. Shri Pawanshree Agrawal, AOR, for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The assessee, engaged in providing vocational training in the fields of Business, Fashion Technology, Advertising & Graphic Design, Media, Hospitality, and Hospital Administration, claimed exemption from service tax under Notification Nos. 9/2003-Service Tax and 24/2004-Service Tax. The tax authorities disputed this claim, arguing that the training provided did not qualify as vocational training as per Sections 65(26), 65(27), and 65(105)(zzc) of the Finance Act, 1994. The matter was adjudicated before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), which ruled in favour of the assessee, holding that the training imparted fell within the scope of vocational training eligible for service tax exemption. The Revenue, aggrieved by the decision, filed an appeal before the High Court. The High Court, affirming CESTAT’s findings, held that the training met the criteria for exemption under the said notifications. The Revenue challenged this ruling before the Supreme Court, contending that the High Court had erroneously classified the courses as vocational training.

Supreme Court Held

The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the High Court and CESTAT did not warrant interference. The Court observed that the findings were neither illegal nor perverse and were based on a proper interpretation of Notification Nos. 9/2003-Service Tax. and 24/2004-Service Tax. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the Revenue’s appeal, upholding the exemption granted to the assessee’s vocational training services.

List of Cases Reviewed

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
SC Dismisses Appeal, Upholds HC Order Limiting Cenvat Credit Use

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

September 17, 2025

Maintenance Reimbursements Not Part of Renting Service | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

September 12, 2025

Construction Agreements With Landowners Are Works Contract | SC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

September 12, 2025

Market Support Services to Foreign Entity Treated as Export: CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

September 10, 2025

Lease of Land for Port and Marine Activities Attracts Service Tax | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

September 8, 2025

Services to Foreign Client for Market Promotion Qualify as Export | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

September 5, 2025

Installing Software With COA Stickers Is Sale—Not Service | SC

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

September 5, 2025

SC Rules Freight Collected by Agents Not Taxable

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

August 30, 2025

Service Tax Demand Invalid When Trade Discounts Passed On | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

August 28, 2025

CGST Officers Can Pursue Pending Service Tax Matters | CESTAT

Excise & Service Tax • News • Case Chronicles

August 22, 2025