SWS Was Not Payable on Imported Goods Cleared After Availing Full Exemption From BCD | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

Social Welfare Surcharge
Case Details: LA TIM Metal & industries Ltd. Versus Union of India (2025) 28 Centax 349 (Bom.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • K.R. Sriram & Arif S. Doctor, JJ
  • Ms Madhura Khandekar, Adv., for the Appellant.
  • Shri Sunil Jain, Authorized Representative, for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner, an importer, cleared imported goods after availing full exemption from Basic Customs Duty (BCD) and Additional Customs Duty (ACD) under Notification No. 24/2015-Customs, dated 08-04-2015, as amended. The Revenue contended that BCD was chargeable at 7.5%, and although the petitioner utilized Merchandise Export from India Scheme (MEIS) Scrips to discharge the duty, the Social Welfare Surcharge (SWS), levied at 10% on BCD, was still payable in cash. The petitioner maintained that since the effective BCD payable was nil, the corresponding SWS should also be computed as nil. The case was brought before the Hon’ble High Court, which examined Sections 25 and 28 of the Customs Act, 1962, along with the applicability of Notification No. 24/2015-Customs, dated 08-04-2015.

High Court Held

The Hon’ble High Court held that since the imported goods were cleared at nil BCD, the SWS liability would also be nil, as SWS is a percentage of BCD. The court rejected the Revenue’s contention that SWS should be paid in cash when the duty was discharged using MEIS Scrips, emphasizing that no notional levy of SWS could arise when the primary duty itself was exempted. Accordingly, the court directed the Revenue to refund the amount paid towards notional SWS within eight weeks. The petition was disposed of in favour of the assessee.

List of Cases Cited

  • Gemini Edibles and Fats India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India — Writ Petition No. 24490 and 27452 of 2019, decided on 3-1-2020 by Madras High Court — Referred [Para 4]
  • LA TIM Metal & Industries Limited v. Union of India — Writ Petition No. 8677 of 2019, decided on 10-8- 2022 by Bombay High Court — Referred [Para 3]
  • Unicorn Industries vs. Union of India — 2019 (370) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.) — Referred [Para 4]

List of Notifications Cited

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
Govt Revises Tariff Values for Edible Oils | Gold | Silver and More

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

February 1, 2026

No Export Duty on Iron Ore Fines Below 58% Fe | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 31, 2026

NDPS Case | SC Allows Interim Release of Foreign Vessel

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 30, 2026

Government Revises Tariff Values For Edible Oils, Gold And Silver

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

January 29, 2026

Gold Smuggling Via Diplomatic Cargo Leads To Licence Revocation | SC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 28, 2026

Commercial Frying System Classifiable Under HSN 8438 | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 24, 2026

Namkeen Frying System Classifiable Under HSN 8438 | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 23, 2026

Customs Can’t Alter FOB Or Recompute Drawback | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 22, 2026

CBL Regulations Breach, Licence Revocation Set Aside, Penalty Upheld

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 21, 2026

CBIC Grants One-Time QCO Exemption For Cross Recessed Screws

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

January 20, 2026