Telephonic Recall of Cleared Goods Without SCN Is Unlawful | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

Telephonic recall of cleared goods
Case Details: Make India Impex Versus Union of India (2025) 35 Centax 94 (Bom.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • M.S. Sonak & Advait M. Sethna, JJ.
  • Dr. Sujay Kantawala a/w. Ms Aishwarya Kantawala, Ms Ayushi Jha i/b. Shri Jaffry Caleb, for the Petitioner.
  • S/Shri Anil C. Singh, Additional Solicitor General, R.S. Apte, Senior Advocate a/w. Jitendra Mishra, Satyaprakash Sharma, Ms Sangeeta Yadav, Rajdatt Nagre, Krishnakant Deshmukh, Adarsh Vyas, Rama Gupta, Rupesh Dubey, Abhishek R. Mishra a/w. Ms Anjali Helekar, for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner had imported goods that were duly assessed, duty paid, and cleared under Section 47 of the Customs Act, 1962, after obtaining necessary statutory clearances. Subsequently, based on certain intelligence inputs alleging prohibited origin, a DRI officer telephonically directed the recall of the already cleared goods. The petitioner challenged this action before the Bombay High Court, contending that the DRI had acted without authority and in violation of due process under the Act.

High Court Held

The Bombay High Court held that once goods are cleared for home consumption under Section 47, a DRI officer cannot, by a mere telephonic instruction, order their recall. Such action, taken without issuance of any show-cause notice or adherence to statutory procedure, was without lawful authority. The Court observed that while Customs authorities may act to enforce prohibitions, they must do so strictly in accordance with law and not by taking the law into their own hands. The Court directed that any further proceedings, if required, be conducted only through a properly issued and time-bound show-cause notice.

List of Cases Cited

List of Notifications Cited

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
No Export Duty on Iron Ore Fines Below 58% Fe | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 31, 2026

NDPS Case | SC Allows Interim Release of Foreign Vessel

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 30, 2026

Government Revises Tariff Values For Edible Oils, Gold And Silver

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

January 29, 2026

Gold Smuggling Via Diplomatic Cargo Leads To Licence Revocation | SC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 28, 2026

Commercial Frying System Classifiable Under HSN 8438 | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 24, 2026

Namkeen Frying System Classifiable Under HSN 8438 | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 23, 2026

Customs Can’t Alter FOB Or Recompute Drawback | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 22, 2026

CBL Regulations Breach, Licence Revocation Set Aside, Penalty Upheld

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 21, 2026

CBIC Grants One-Time QCO Exemption For Cross Recessed Screws

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

January 20, 2026

RoSCTL Benefits Extended To Postal Exports Via E-Entry

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

January 19, 2026