GSTN Issues Guidance on Rejected Invoices in IMS

GST • News • Statutory Scope

Rejected invoices IMS

GSTN Advisory, Dated 19-06-2025

The Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) has issued a detailed advisory to guide taxpayers in correcting inadvertently rejected invoices, debit notes, credit notes, and ECO documents in the Invoice Management System (IMS). This step aims to streamline rectifications and ensure accurate reflection of Input Tax Credit (ITC) in Form GSTR-2B.

1. Corrective Actions for Rejected Documents

In cases where recipients have wrongly rejected documents:

  • The recipient may request the supplier to re-report the same record without any modification.
  • The supplier can furnish the record in:
    • Form GSTR-1A of the same tax period; or
    • The amendment table of a subsequent Form GSTR-1 or IFF.

Once the document is accepted on IMS, the system will recompute Form GSTR-2B, enabling the recipient to avail or reverse ITC accordingly.

Note – The supplier’s tax liability remains unaffected, as the amendment reflects only the delta value.

2. Special Case – Credit Note Rejection After GSTR-3B Filing

If a credit note was inadvertently rejected and the GSTR-3B return has already been filed, the following applies:

  • Automatic reversal is not possible.
  • The supplier may re-report the same credit note, unchanged, via:
    • Form GSTR-1A of the same period; or
    • The amendment table in a later GSTR-1/IFF.

Upon the recipient’s acceptance and recomputation of Form GSTR-2B:

  • The recipient’s ITC will be reduced by the original credit note amount.
  • Simultaneously, the supplier’s liability—previously added back—will be reduced, resulting in zero net impact.

3. Objective and Impact

This advisory ensures:

  • Consistency and transparency in ITC adjustments.
  • No duplication or excess liability on the part of the supplier.
  • A clear mechanism for reconciliation and correction within the IMS and return filing framework.

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
Rule 36(4) CGST Not Arbitrary | Ensures ITC Compliance – HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

June 20, 2025

Confiscation Not Justified for Excess Stock Alone | Allahabad HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

June 19, 2025

Delhi Govt Makes Virtual Hearings Mandatory for All GST Cases

GST • News • Statutory Scope

June 18, 2025

E-Way Bill 2.0 Portal Launches on 1st July 2025 | GSTN Update

GST • News • Statutory Scope

June 18, 2025

Data Hosting to Foreign Affiliates Qualifies as Export of Service | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

June 17, 2025

SPL-01/SPL-02 Can Be Filed Despite Table 4 Mismatch | GSTN

GST • News • Statutory Scope

June 16, 2025

GSTN Offers Alternate Filing Route for Amnesty Applications u/s 128A

GST • News • Statutory Scope

June 13, 2025

GSTN Fixes Refund Filing Issue for QRMP Taxpayers

GST • News • Statutory Scope

June 13, 2025

DIN Not Needed for GST Portal Communications with RFN | CBIC

GST • News • Statutory Scope

June 11, 2025

No Transitional ITC Under GST Without Resale of UPVAT Stock | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

June 10, 2025