HC Dismisses Writ for Delay in Challenging Order Before Filing Refund Claim

GST • News • Case Chronicles

Case Details: Moms Cradle Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India (2025) 35 Centax 198 (Del.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Prathiba M. Singh & Shail Jain, JJ.
  • S/Shri Ritaj Kacker, Deepansh Dhanija & Ms Divya Rastogi, Adv., for the Petitioner.
  • Shri Ruchesh Sinha, SSC & Ms Upasana Vashishtha, Adv., for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner, a company engaged in export of goods on payment of IGST, had filed a refund claim which was initially rejected by the jurisdictional authority under CGST. Pursuant to directions of the Delhi High Court in an earlier writ, the department reconsidered the matter and again rejected the claim, against which the petitioner filed an appeal. The Appellate Authority partly allowed the appeal. The petitioner contended that the remaining refund was not released and sought permission to file an appeal against a subsequent demand order alleging fraudulent availment of ITC, stating that the order had not come to its knowledge within the limitation period. It was further submitted that the refund sanctioned by the Appellate Authority may be adjusted as pre-deposit for filing the proposed appeal. The Department of Revenue argued that the petitioner had duly participated in the proceedings and that the refund was being withheld in view of the subsisting demand order. The matter was accordingly placed before the Delhi High Court.

High Court Held

The Delhi High Court held that there was no violation of the principles of natural justice, as the petitioner had participated in the proceedings culminating in the demand order. It was observed that the petitioner failed to file an appeal within the prescribed limitation period and that such delay could not be condoned in exercise of writ jurisdiction.As regards the refund, it was directed that the amount allowed by the Appellate Authority be adjusted against the demand raised under the said order. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed.

List of Cases Cited

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
CBIC Defines Officer Jurisdiction and Monetary Limits for SCNs and Orders Under CGST Act

GST • News • Statutory Scope

October 30, 2025

HC Quashes ITC Demand Order Passed Without Hearing After GST Cancellation

GST • News • Case Chronicles

October 29, 2025

HC Remands Case Over Inconsistent Refund Orders Passed on Similar Facts

GST • News • Case Chronicles

October 28, 2025

HC Upholds GST Goods Detention for Missing Documents at Interception

GST • News • Case Chronicles

October 27, 2025

HC Grants Regular Bail in GST Evasion Case With Travel Restrictions

GST • News • Case Chronicles

October 27, 2025

SC Upholds HC Order on Conditional Release of GST Recovery Amounts

GST • News • Case Chronicles

October 25, 2025

HC Upholds GST Goods Detention for Lack of Documents at Interception

GST • News • Case Chronicles

October 25, 2025

No Profiteering if Builder Refunds Full Amount After Flat Cancellation | GSTAT

GST • News • Case Chronicles

October 24, 2025

GSTN Introduces New IMS Features for Managing Credit Notes and ITC Reversal

GST • News • Statutory Scope

October 24, 2025

HC Quashes CGST Proceedings Initiated After State GST Action on Same Matter

GST • News • Case Chronicles

October 24, 2025