CBIC Clarifies Review and Appeal Authority for DGGI Adjudications

GST • News • Statutory Scope

CBIC review and appeal authority

Circular No. 250/07/2025-GST, Dated 24-06-2025

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has issued a circular to provide clarity on the competent authorities responsible for review, revision, and appeal of Orders-in-Original (O-I-Os) issued by Common Adjudicating Authorities (CAAs) in respect of show cause notices (SCNs) initiated by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI).

1. Reviewing and Revisional Authority Under CGST Act

As per the circular, the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Central Tax, under whose jurisdiction the CAA (i.e., Additional Commissioner or Joint Commissioner) is posted, shall:

  • Function as the Reviewing Authority under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017, and
  • Serve as the Revisional Authority under Section 108 of the same Act.

This clarification ensures consistency and administrative accountability for adjudication proceedings initiated by DGGI but adjudicated by officers posted in different Commissionerates.

2. Jurisdiction for Appeals Against O-I-Os Passed by CAAs

The CBIC circular further specifies that appeals filed against such Orders-in-Original will lie before the Commissioner (Appeals) having jurisdiction over the Commissionerate where the CAA is posted.

This jurisdiction is to be determined in accordance with Table III of Notification No. 02/2017-Central Tax, dated 19-06-2017. It ensures that appeals are handled by the appellate authority within the same administrative zone as the adjudicating officer.

3. Departmental Representation in Appeals

For all such appeal proceedings, the same Commissionerate (i.e., where the CAA is posted and which has territorial jurisdiction over the matter) shall also be responsible for representing the department.

This alignment of adjudicating, appellate, and departmental representation authorities aims to streamline the process and avoid jurisdictional ambiguities in DGGI-originated cases adjudicated through CAAs.

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
Refund of ITC Allowed on Business Closure | No Bar Under GST – HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

June 27, 2025

Pre-Arrest Bail Denied in GST Fake Invoice Scam | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

June 27, 2025

Interest on GST Refund Delay Allowed After Adjusting Petitioner’s Delay | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

June 26, 2025

No ITC on PEB Structure Steel & Cement for Crane Use | AAR

GST • News • Case Chronicles

June 24, 2025

Writ Petition Dismissed Over ITC Fraud and Lack of Clean Hands | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

June 23, 2025

GSTN Issues Guidance on Rejected Invoices in IMS

GST • News • Statutory Scope

June 21, 2025

Rule 36(4) CGST Not Arbitrary | Ensures ITC Compliance – HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

June 20, 2025

Confiscation Not Justified for Excess Stock Alone | Allahabad HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

June 19, 2025

Delhi Govt Makes Virtual Hearings Mandatory for All GST Cases

GST • News • Statutory Scope

June 18, 2025

E-Way Bill 2.0 Portal Launches on 1st July 2025 | GSTN Update

GST • News • Statutory Scope

June 18, 2025