Government Entity Was Directed to Pay Differential Amount, Despite Pending State Approval as GST Rate Increased From 12% to 18% | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

GST liability on government contracts
Case Details: SKB Projects India Pvt. Ltd. Versus State of Madhya Pradesh (2025) 28 Centax 152 (M.P.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari & Avanindra Kumar Singh, JJ.
  • Shri Akshay Khandelwal, Adv. for the Petitioner.
  • Shri Abhijit Awasthi, Deputy Adv. General for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner, a construction company, was awarded a contract for the construction and renovation of Government New Law College, Indore, pursuant to work orders issued by the respondent, a government entity classified as a ‘Government Entity’ under the GST Act, 2017. Subsequently, the rate of GST applicable to construction services was increased from 12% to 18% through a statutory notification. Notwithstanding this revision, the respondent continued to process payments at the earlier rate of 12%, whereas the petitioner remained obligated to discharge GST at the revised rate of 18%. Although the respondent formally acknowledged its liability to pay the additional 6% GST, it withheld the payment citing the pendency of requisite approval from the State Government. Aggrieved by this inaction, the petitioner instituted a writ petition seeking appropriate relief for the release of the differential GST amount.

High Court Held

The Hon’ble High Court, relying on the precedent established in Writ Petition No. 39378 of 2024, held that the respondent was liable to discharge the differential 6% GST for the specified period, irrespective of the pending State Government approval. Accordingly, the Court directed the respondent to remit the differential amount within three months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order. Furthermore, in the event of non-compliance, the Court determined that the petitioner would be entitled to interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date on which the entitlement arose. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed.

List of Notifications Cited

  • Notification No.24/2017 CT(R) dated 21.09.2017
  • Notification No.15/2021 CT(R) dated 18.11.2021

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
HC Restores GST Registration Subject to Filing Returns and Clearing Dues

GST • News • Case Chronicles

September 17, 2025

GST on Post-Sale Discounts – CBIC Circular 251/2025 Clarification

GST • News • Statutory Scope

September 16, 2025

HC Rules Proceedings Against Deceased Assessee A Nullity

GST • News • Case Chronicles

September 15, 2025

Writ Admission Without Interim Order Does Not Halt GST Proceedings | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

September 12, 2025

GSTN Prohibits Filing of GST Returns After Three Years From Due Date

GST • News • Statutory Scope

September 12, 2025

New GST Rates to Impact Heavy Industries and Related Sectors

GST • News • Statutory Scope

September 10, 2025

Bauxite Handling for SEZ Unit Treated as Zero-Rated Supply | AAR

GST • News • Case Chronicles

September 9, 2025

Matter Remanded as SCN Uploaded Without Assessee’s Knowledge| HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

September 8, 2025

Detailed Analysis of 56th GST Council Meeting Outcomes

GST • News • Legal Beacon

September 6, 2025

FAQs on 56th GST Council Meeting Decisions Released by Govt

GST • News • Statutory Scope

September 5, 2025