HC Directs Amendment of Shipping Bill to Correct GSTIN and Enable IGST Refund

GST • News • Case Chronicles

correction of GSTIN
Case Details: Auracare Pharma Pvt. Ltd. Versus Assistant Commissioner of Customs Air Cargo Complex (2025) 29 Centax 408 (Guj.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Bhargav D. Karia & D.N. Ray, JJ.
  • Shri Darshan R Patel, Adv. for the Petitioner.
  • MS Hardika Vyas for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner, a registered exporter under the GST regime, procured raw materials and effected an export of goods. While filing the shipping bill details on the ICEGATE portal at the time of export, the petitioner inadvertently entered the GSTIN of its sister concern, which had a similar name. This clerical error led to the shipping bill being generated in the name of the sister concern, despite the export being undertaken by the petitioner. Due to this mismatch between the shipping bill and the GST returns filed by the petitioner under Form GSTR-1 and Form GSTR-3B, the claim for refund of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) paid on the export was rejected by the revenue. Upon receiving the rejection, the petitioner submitted a written representation requesting the correction of the shipping bill details in the EDI system to reflect the correct GSTIN. In response, the revenue acknowledged that the petitioner had indeed erroneously entered the GSTIN of its sister concern. The authority further verified and confirmed that the petitioner was the actual exporter by cross-checking the relevant GST returns. However, the revenue stated that rectification in the EDI system could not be carried out once the export was completed, and accordingly, the refund could not be granted. Consequently, the petitioner filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court seeking directions for necessary amendments in the EDI system and the GST portal to enable the release of the IGST refund.

High Court Held

The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court held that the petitioner’s inadvertent error, duly verified and substantiated through GST returns, could not justify denial of refund. The Court directed the revenue to amend the shipping bill in the EDI system by entering the correct GSTIN of the petitioner and to make corresponding changes on the GST portal. The entire process, including refund disbursal, was to be completed within twelve weeks.

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
HC Restores GST Registration Subject to Filing Returns and Clearing Dues

GST • News • Case Chronicles

September 17, 2025

GST on Post-Sale Discounts – CBIC Circular 251/2025 Clarification

GST • News • Statutory Scope

September 16, 2025

HC Rules Proceedings Against Deceased Assessee A Nullity

GST • News • Case Chronicles

September 15, 2025

Writ Admission Without Interim Order Does Not Halt GST Proceedings | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

September 12, 2025

GSTN Prohibits Filing of GST Returns After Three Years From Due Date

GST • News • Statutory Scope

September 12, 2025

New GST Rates to Impact Heavy Industries and Related Sectors

GST • News • Statutory Scope

September 10, 2025

Bauxite Handling for SEZ Unit Treated as Zero-Rated Supply | AAR

GST • News • Case Chronicles

September 9, 2025

Matter Remanded as SCN Uploaded Without Assessee’s Knowledge| HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

September 8, 2025

Detailed Analysis of 56th GST Council Meeting Outcomes

GST • News • Legal Beacon

September 6, 2025

FAQs on 56th GST Council Meeting Decisions Released by Govt

GST • News • Statutory Scope

September 5, 2025