Refund Can’t Be Denied for Post-Cutoff Filing | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

GST refund cutoff circular
Case Details: Louis Dreyfus Company India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India (2025) 31 Centax 237 (Guj.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Bhargav D. Karia & D.N. Ray, JJ.
  • Shri Kishore Kunal & Ms Priyal M. Parikh for the Petitioner.
  • Shri Neel P. Lakhani for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner filed a refund application under Section 54 of the CGST Act and the Gujarat GST Act for tax periods falling within an earlier timeframe, with the corresponding limitation period extending into the future. The refund was sought on account of accumulation of input tax credit due to an inverted duty structure. The jurisdictional officer under CGST rejected the application on the ground that it was filed after the cutoff date stipulated in paragraph 2(2) of Circular No. 181/13/2022-GST, dated 10-11-2022, which sought to differentiate refund applications filed before and after a specific date. The petitioner submitted that the said paragraph had already been struck down and therefore could not be relied upon to deny the refund claim. The matter was accordingly placed before the High Court of Gujarat.

High Court Held

The High Court of Gujarat held that paragraph 2(2) of Circular No. 181/13/2022-GST, dated 10-11-2022 had already been struck down in Patanjali Foods Ltd. v. Union of India 2025 (97) G.S.T.L. 24/(2025) 28 Centax 75 (Guj.) and Priyanka Refineries Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner ST (2025) 27 Centax 113 (A.P.). It was observed that the refund application filed by the petitioner was within the limitation period prescribed under Section 54(1) of the CGST Act and the Gujarat GST Act. Accordingly, the rejection of the refund application on the basis of a provision that had already been invalidated was not sustainable.

List of Cases Cited

List of Circulars and Notifications Cited

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
Overseas Supply via Direct Shipment Not a Supply Under GST | AAR

GST • News • Case Chronicles

July 11, 2025

Customs-Related Queries Not Maintainable Under GST | Gujarat AAR

GST • News • Case Chronicles

July 10, 2025

Unvalidated Cancer Tests Not Exempt as Healthcare Services | AAR

GST • News • Case Chronicles

July 9, 2025

Barter of Silver Scrap for Ornaments Is Taxable Under GST | AAR

GST • News • Case Chronicles

July 8, 2025

GST Penalty Quashed for Denial of Fair Hearing | Allahabad HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

July 8, 2025

No GST Interest If Cash Ledger Credited on Time | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

July 8, 2025

No Rule 86B Relief if No Partner Paid ₹1L Tax | AAR

GST • News • Case Chronicles

July 6, 2025

HC Rejects Writ Over ITC Fraud | SCN Concealment Cited

GST • News • Case Chronicles

July 4, 2025

Cash Credit Not ‘Property’ Under Section 83 | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

July 3, 2025

Bail Denied in ₹11.97 Cr GST ITC Fraud Due to Ongoing Probe | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

July 3, 2025