Renewal of Provisional Attachment after One Year Invalid | SC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

provisional attachment under GST
Case Details: Kesari Nandan Mobile Versus Office of Assistant Commissioner of State Tax (2025) 33 Centax 224 (S.C.) 

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • DIPANKAR DATTA and Augustine George Masih, JJ.

Facts of the Case

The assessee challenged the renewal of provisional attachment of its bank accounts by the respondent after one year from the date of the original provisional attachment order under CGST and Gujarat GST. The assessee contended that the respondent had not disposed of objections raised against the original attachment order and that no statutory provision authorized renewal beyond the one-year period. The High Court held that provisional attachment orders cease to have effect after one year, but observed that authorities could renew the attachment upon recording satisfaction, noting that the assessee was allegedly engaged in fraudulent invoicing, resulting in revenue loss. The assessee appealed, seeking a declaration that renewal of a lapsed provisional attachment order without statutory backing was null and void. The matter was accordingly placed before the Supreme Court. 

High Court Held

The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that renewal of provisional attachment after the expiry of one year is invalid, as there is no statutory authority permitting such renewal, and allowing it would defeat the legislative intent of Section 83. The Court reasoned that granting power to the revenue to renew or reissue a lapsed provisional attachment order would render sub-section (2) of Section 83 otiose and exceed the statutory framework. Consequently, the impugned renewal orders had ceased to have effect by operation of law, and the bank accounts attached by the respondent were to be de-freezed and made operable forthwith. 

List of Cases Reviewed

List of Cases Cited

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
No ITC on Compensation Cess for Coal Used in Township Electricity | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

August 27, 2025

Refund Limitation Begins from IGST Payment Date – Not Original CGST/SGST | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

August 26, 2025

Baby Net Bed Classifiable as Mattress Support — Taxable at 18% GST | AAR

GST • News • Case Chronicles

August 25, 2025

No Penalty for Not Mentioning Transporter in E-Way Bill | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

August 25, 2025

HC Orders Refund Of GST Recovered Before Limitation Period

GST • News • Case Chronicles

August 23, 2025

HC Sets Aside GST Registration Cancellation Over Vague SCN

GST • News • Case Chronicles

August 23, 2025

SC Dismisses SLP | Amendment to Rule 89(5) Applies Retrospectively

GST • News • Case Chronicles

August 22, 2025

GSTR-3B [July 2025] Due Date Extended to August 27 for Maharashtra Districts

GST • News • Statutory Scope

August 22, 2025

SC Grants Time to File Appeal Despite Delay in Reply to SCN

GST • News • Case Chronicles

August 20, 2025

HC Directs GST Dept To Upload Amended DRC-07 For Amnesty

GST • News • Case Chronicles

August 20, 2025