Renewal of Provisional Attachment after One Year Invalid | SC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

provisional attachment under GST
Case Details: Kesari Nandan Mobile Versus Office of Assistant Commissioner of State Tax (2025) 33 Centax 224 (S.C.) 

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • DIPANKAR DATTA and Augustine George Masih, JJ.

Facts of the Case

The assessee challenged the renewal of provisional attachment of its bank accounts by the respondent after one year from the date of the original provisional attachment order under CGST and Gujarat GST. The assessee contended that the respondent had not disposed of objections raised against the original attachment order and that no statutory provision authorized renewal beyond the one-year period. The High Court held that provisional attachment orders cease to have effect after one year, but observed that authorities could renew the attachment upon recording satisfaction, noting that the assessee was allegedly engaged in fraudulent invoicing, resulting in revenue loss. The assessee appealed, seeking a declaration that renewal of a lapsed provisional attachment order without statutory backing was null and void. The matter was accordingly placed before the Supreme Court. 

High Court Held

The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that renewal of provisional attachment after the expiry of one year is invalid, as there is no statutory authority permitting such renewal, and allowing it would defeat the legislative intent of Section 83. The Court reasoned that granting power to the revenue to renew or reissue a lapsed provisional attachment order would render sub-section (2) of Section 83 otiose and exceed the statutory framework. Consequently, the impugned renewal orders had ceased to have effect by operation of law, and the bank accounts attached by the respondent were to be de-freezed and made operable forthwith. 

List of Cases Reviewed

List of Cases Cited

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
HC Quashes GST Demand Order for Denial of Hearing | Fresh Notice Directed

GST • News • Case Chronicles

November 4, 2025

Recovery During GST Search Without SCN Held Illegal—Refund with Interest Ordered | HC

GST • News • Case Chronicles

November 4, 2025

Copy of CGST (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2025

GST • News • Statutory Scope

November 3, 2025

GSTN Launches ‘Import of Goods’ Module in IMS from Oct 2025

GST • News • Statutory Scope

November 1, 2025

GSTN Bars Filing of GST Returns Beyond 3 Years From Due Date

GST • News • Statutory Scope

October 31, 2025

CBIC Defines Officer Jurisdiction and Monetary Limits for SCNs and Orders Under CGST Act

GST • News • Statutory Scope

October 30, 2025

HC Quashes ITC Demand Order Passed Without Hearing After GST Cancellation

GST • News • Case Chronicles

October 29, 2025

HC Dismisses Writ for Delay in Challenging Order Before Filing Refund Claim

GST • News • Case Chronicles

October 28, 2025

HC Remands Case Over Inconsistent Refund Orders Passed on Similar Facts

GST • News • Case Chronicles

October 28, 2025

HC Upholds GST Goods Detention for Missing Documents at Interception

GST • News • Case Chronicles

October 27, 2025