No Denial of SHIS Benefit if Zero-Duty Benefit Under EPCG Was Surrendered and Regularized by DGFT | CESTAT

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Case Chronicles

SHIS Benefits
Case Details: Nagreeka Exports Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata (2025) 27 Centax 1 (Tri.-Cal)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • S/Shri Ashok Jindal, Member (J) & K. Anpazhakan, Member (T)
  • S/Shri Sachin Chitnis & Siddhanth Sriram, Advs., for the Appellant.
  • Shri Faiz Ahmed, Authorized Representative, for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The assessee, engaged in textile exports, applied for Status Holder Incentive Scheme (SHIS) benefits for the years 2009-10 to 2012-13. However, with the discontinuation of SHIS, the assessee availed the Zero Duty Export Promotion Capital Goods (EPCG) scheme in 2013-14. Subsequently, the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) and the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) raised objections, citing the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2009-14, which prohibited simultaneous availing of both benefits. To address this, the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) Public Notice No. 30/2016 and Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) Circular No. 45/2016 allowed the surrender of one benefit. The assessee relinquished EPCG benefits, deposited duty with interest, and obtained DGFT approval. Despite this, the Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata, denied SHIS benefits and raised a demand. Aggrieved, the assessee challenged the order before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT).

CESTAT Held

The Hon’ble CESTAT held that the denial of SHIS benefits was legally unsustainable, as the DGFT and CBEC clarifications expressly permitted the surrender of EPCG benefits to avail SHIS. The assessee’s compliance with the prescribed procedure, including duty payment and DGFT approval, rendered the Customs Department’s refusal without jurisdiction. The Tribunal, therefore, quashed the demand and upheld the assessee’s right to claim SHIS benefits.

List of Cases Cited

List of Departmental Clarification Cited

  • D.G.F.T. Public Notice No. 30/2015-20, dated 8-9-2016 [Paras 2.1, 3, 3.2, 6]
  • C.B.E.C. Circular No. 45/2016-Cus., Dated 23-9-2016 [Paras 2.1, 3, 3.2, 6]

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
DGFT Pakistan Import Ban – FTP Notification 06/2025-26

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

May 5, 2025

DGFT Seeks Stakeholder Comments on Aligning ITC(HS) Schedule-II with Finance Act 2025 Amendments

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

May 1, 2025

DGFT Adds ‘Mode of Export of Services’ in eBRC Format

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

April 28, 2025

DGFT Imposes Minimum Import Price on Synthetic Knitted Fabrics

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

April 28, 2025

Overriding Effect of Foreign Trade Policy | Legal Framework and Key Rulings

Foreign Trade Policy • Analysis

April 17, 2025

Understanding India’s Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) & Tariff Preferences

Foreign Trade Policy • Analysis

April 17, 2025

DGFT Operationalises ‘Global Tariff and Trade’ Helpdesk to Address Export-Import Challenges Amid Evolving Trade Issues | Trade Notice

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

April 15, 2025

DGFT Amends Appendix 4B of Handbook of Procedures, 2023 to Update List of Banks Authorized to Import Gold/Silver | Public Notice

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

April 8, 2025

DGFT Includes LCS Darranga as a Food Import Entry Point in List ‘A’ of Appendix-V, ITC (HS), 2022, in Sync With FSSAI Guidelines | Notification

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

April 6, 2025

Import Policy of Areca Nuts Revised From ‘Free’ to ‘Prohibited’ | Notification

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

April 6, 2025