No Denial of SHIS Benefit if Zero-Duty Benefit Under EPCG Was Surrendered and Regularized by DGFT | CESTAT

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Case Chronicles

SHIS Benefits
Case Details: Nagreeka Exports Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata (2025) 27 Centax 1 (Tri.-Cal)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • S/Shri Ashok Jindal, Member (J) & K. Anpazhakan, Member (T)
  • S/Shri Sachin Chitnis & Siddhanth Sriram, Advs., for the Appellant.
  • Shri Faiz Ahmed, Authorized Representative, for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The assessee, engaged in textile exports, applied for Status Holder Incentive Scheme (SHIS) benefits for the years 2009-10 to 2012-13. However, with the discontinuation of SHIS, the assessee availed the Zero Duty Export Promotion Capital Goods (EPCG) scheme in 2013-14. Subsequently, the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) and the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) raised objections, citing the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2009-14, which prohibited simultaneous availing of both benefits. To address this, the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) Public Notice No. 30/2016 and Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) Circular No. 45/2016 allowed the surrender of one benefit. The assessee relinquished EPCG benefits, deposited duty with interest, and obtained DGFT approval. Despite this, the Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata, denied SHIS benefits and raised a demand. Aggrieved, the assessee challenged the order before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT).

CESTAT Held

The Hon’ble CESTAT held that the denial of SHIS benefits was legally unsustainable, as the DGFT and CBEC clarifications expressly permitted the surrender of EPCG benefits to avail SHIS. The assessee’s compliance with the prescribed procedure, including duty payment and DGFT approval, rendered the Customs Department’s refusal without jurisdiction. The Tribunal, therefore, quashed the demand and upheld the assessee’s right to claim SHIS benefits.

List of Cases Cited

List of Departmental Clarification Cited

  • D.G.F.T. Public Notice No. 30/2015-20, dated 8-9-2016 [Paras 2.1, 3, 3.2, 6]
  • C.B.E.C. Circular No. 45/2016-Cus., Dated 23-9-2016 [Paras 2.1, 3, 3.2, 6]

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
HC Rules Writ Not Maintainable in DGFT TRQ Allocation Decisions

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Case Chronicles

September 16, 2025

DGFT Notifies Amendment Facility for Unutilized DFIAs

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

September 12, 2025

DGFT Notifies Amendment to Export Policy of Animal By-Products

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

September 10, 2025

MEIS Benefits under Foreign Trade Policy – Supreme Court Ruling in Shah Nanji Nagsi Exports Case

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Case Chronicles

September 8, 2025

DGFT Clarifies Exemptions From MIP on Virgin Multi-Layer Paper Board Imports

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

September 6, 2025

DGFT Invites Feedback on SION Revision for Food Items

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

August 29, 2025

DGFT Extends Export Obligation for Textile QCOs

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

August 29, 2025

DGFT Suspends SIONs for Certain Food Products

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

August 28, 2025

Mega Power Plant Not Capital Goods, No FTP Deemed Export Benefits | SC

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Case Chronicles

August 27, 2025

DGFT Amends Diamond Imprest Authorization under FTP 2023

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

August 21, 2025