No Denial of SHIS Benefit if Zero-Duty Benefit Under EPCG Was Surrendered and Regularized by DGFT | CESTAT

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Case Chronicles

SHIS Benefits
Case Details: Nagreeka Exports Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata (2025) 27 Centax 1 (Tri.-Cal)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • S/Shri Ashok Jindal, Member (J) & K. Anpazhakan, Member (T)
  • S/Shri Sachin Chitnis & Siddhanth Sriram, Advs., for the Appellant.
  • Shri Faiz Ahmed, Authorized Representative, for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The assessee, engaged in textile exports, applied for Status Holder Incentive Scheme (SHIS) benefits for the years 2009-10 to 2012-13. However, with the discontinuation of SHIS, the assessee availed the Zero Duty Export Promotion Capital Goods (EPCG) scheme in 2013-14. Subsequently, the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) and the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) raised objections, citing the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2009-14, which prohibited simultaneous availing of both benefits. To address this, the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) Public Notice No. 30/2016 and Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) Circular No. 45/2016 allowed the surrender of one benefit. The assessee relinquished EPCG benefits, deposited duty with interest, and obtained DGFT approval. Despite this, the Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata, denied SHIS benefits and raised a demand. Aggrieved, the assessee challenged the order before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT).

CESTAT Held

The Hon’ble CESTAT held that the denial of SHIS benefits was legally unsustainable, as the DGFT and CBEC clarifications expressly permitted the surrender of EPCG benefits to avail SHIS. The assessee’s compliance with the prescribed procedure, including duty payment and DGFT approval, rendered the Customs Department’s refusal without jurisdiction. The Tribunal, therefore, quashed the demand and upheld the assessee’s right to claim SHIS benefits.

List of Cases Cited

List of Departmental Clarification Cited

  • D.G.F.T. Public Notice No. 30/2015-20, dated 8-9-2016 [Paras 2.1, 3, 3.2, 6]
  • C.B.E.C. Circular No. 45/2016-Cus., Dated 23-9-2016 [Paras 2.1, 3, 3.2, 6]

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
DGFT Seeks Inputs on Draft Amended Aayat Niryat Forms (ANF) | Trade Notice

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

November 3, 2025

DGFT Issues Online Refund Procedure for Gold TRQ Fees Under India–UAE CEPA

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

October 31, 2025

DGFT Permits Self-Declaration of Certificate of Origin Under India-EFTA TEPA

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

October 30, 2025

DGFT Clarifies Import Restrictions on Silver Jewellery Not Applicable to SEZ/EOU and AA/DFIA Units

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

October 29, 2025

DGFT Exempts Low-GSM Fabrics from Minimum Import Price Condition

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

October 25, 2025

DGFT Prohibits Import of Roasted Areca Nuts Below Rs. 351/kg CIF Value

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

October 17, 2025

DGFT Amends Export Policy for Meat Exports | Notification

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

October 16, 2025

DGFT Mandates REEIMS Registration for Solar & Wind Energy Imports

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

October 14, 2025

Export of Specified Farm Goods to Bhutan Now Allowed | DGFT

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

October 6, 2025

DGFT Enables eCOO Filing on Trade Connect Platform

Foreign Trade Policy • News • Statutory Scope

October 4, 2025