EOU SCN Adjudication – CBIC Sets New Customs Thresholds

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

Notification 35/2025 Customs

Notification No. 35/2025–Customs (N.T.), Dated 16-05-2025

1. Why a Fresh Notification?

Earlier notifications shifted jurisdiction over 100 % Export-Oriented Undertakings (EOUs) from Central Excise to Customs and simultaneously appointed Customs officers as Central-Excise officers. When appellate forums sent back (“remanded”) certain legacy show-cause notices (SCNs) that contained both Customs-duty and Central-Excise duty demands, there was no clarity on who should redo the adjudication. Notification No. 35/2025-Customs (N.T.), dated 16 May 2025 now plugs that gap by reallocating such remanded SCNs to Customs officers and prescribing monetary-based authority levels.

2. Scope of the Notification

  • Covers only remanded cases – SCNs that were originally decided by Central-Excise officers under Rule 3 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 and later set aside for de-novo adjudication.
  • Applies to mixed-duty notices – The SCN must involve both Customs and Central-Excise demands on an EOU.
  • Prospective effect – Takes effect from the date of publication in the Official Gazette (16 May 2025). Ongoing de-novo proceedings not yet disposed must switch to the new authority, and appellate bodies are expected to remand future cases directly to the proper Customs officer per the table.

3. Practical Implications

  • Single-window clarity – Eliminates parallel proceedings—one common Customs officer passes a composite order covering both duties.
  • Speed & consistency – Monetary banding mirrors regular Customs adjudication thresholds and should help standardise timelines.
  • Appeal route – Orders will be appealable before the Commissioner (Appeals) or CESTAT under the Customs Act, streamlining the appellate hierarchy.

4. Conclusion

From 16 May 2025, any EOU show-cause notice that was earlier decided by Central-Excise officers, got remanded, and involves both Customs and Excise components must be freshly adjudicated only by the designated Customs officer as per the new duty-based slabs. EOUs and counsel should realign their litigation strategy to the revised authority structure without delay.

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
Govt Revises Tariff Values for Edible Oils | Gold | Silver and More

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

February 1, 2026

No Export Duty on Iron Ore Fines Below 58% Fe | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 31, 2026

NDPS Case | SC Allows Interim Release of Foreign Vessel

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 30, 2026

Government Revises Tariff Values For Edible Oils, Gold And Silver

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

January 29, 2026

Gold Smuggling Via Diplomatic Cargo Leads To Licence Revocation | SC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 28, 2026

Commercial Frying System Classifiable Under HSN 8438 | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 24, 2026

Namkeen Frying System Classifiable Under HSN 8438 | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 23, 2026

Customs Can’t Alter FOB Or Recompute Drawback | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 22, 2026

CBL Regulations Breach, Licence Revocation Set Aside, Penalty Upheld

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

January 21, 2026

CBIC Grants One-Time QCO Exemption For Cross Recessed Screws

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

January 20, 2026