EOU SCN Adjudication – CBIC Sets New Customs Thresholds

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

Notification 35/2025 Customs

Notification No. 35/2025–Customs (N.T.), Dated 16-05-2025

1. Why a Fresh Notification?

Earlier notifications shifted jurisdiction over 100 % Export-Oriented Undertakings (EOUs) from Central Excise to Customs and simultaneously appointed Customs officers as Central-Excise officers. When appellate forums sent back (“remanded”) certain legacy show-cause notices (SCNs) that contained both Customs-duty and Central-Excise duty demands, there was no clarity on who should redo the adjudication. Notification No. 35/2025-Customs (N.T.), dated 16 May 2025 now plugs that gap by reallocating such remanded SCNs to Customs officers and prescribing monetary-based authority levels.

2. Scope of the Notification

  • Covers only remanded cases – SCNs that were originally decided by Central-Excise officers under Rule 3 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 and later set aside for de-novo adjudication.
  • Applies to mixed-duty notices – The SCN must involve both Customs and Central-Excise demands on an EOU.
  • Prospective effect – Takes effect from the date of publication in the Official Gazette (16 May 2025). Ongoing de-novo proceedings not yet disposed must switch to the new authority, and appellate bodies are expected to remand future cases directly to the proper Customs officer per the table.

3. Practical Implications

  • Single-window clarity – Eliminates parallel proceedings—one common Customs officer passes a composite order covering both duties.
  • Speed & consistency – Monetary banding mirrors regular Customs adjudication thresholds and should help standardise timelines.
  • Appeal route – Orders will be appealable before the Commissioner (Appeals) or CESTAT under the Customs Act, streamlining the appellate hierarchy.

4. Conclusion

From 16 May 2025, any EOU show-cause notice that was earlier decided by Central-Excise officers, got remanded, and involves both Customs and Excise components must be freshly adjudicated only by the designated Customs officer as per the new duty-based slabs. EOUs and counsel should realign their litigation strategy to the revised authority structure without delay.

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
KYC Fulfilled by Verifying IEC and GSTIN | No Physical Check Needed—CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

July 19, 2025

CBIC Grants BIS Exemption for Steel Imports

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

July 17, 2025

Legal Heirs Not Liable for Customs Penalty After Assessee’s Death | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

July 16, 2025

Anti-Dumping Duty on Clear Float Glass Extended till Feb 2026

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

July 15, 2025

Mobile Chargers Not Part of Phones | Taxed Separately—HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

July 11, 2025

Gold Jewellery Worn by Foreign National Not Dutiable Baggage | Delhi HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

July 10, 2025

Declared Value Upheld as Black Pepper Import Ban Was Conditional | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

July 9, 2025

Importer Barred from Re-Litigating Pre-Deposit Issue | Delhi HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

July 8, 2025

SCN Must Precede Confiscation of Seized Sale Proceeds | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

July 8, 2025

CMDA Nod After Import Valid for STP Customs Exemption | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

July 6, 2025