No GST on LWA Fee for Private Jobs | AAR Kerala

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

GST on LWA fee AAR Kerala ruling Leave without allowance GST Directorate of Medical Education GST exemption Non-supply under GST
Case Details : Directorate of Medical Education (2025) 32 Centax 326 (A.A.R. - GST - Ker.) 

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • S/Shri Jomy Jacob IRS and Mansur M.I., Members
  •  Shri S.R. Rajesh, Authorized Representative. for the Applicant.

Facts of the Case

The applicant, the Directorate of Medical Education, submitted an application to the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) seeking clarification regarding the applicability of GST on the fees collected from medical officers, nursing staff, and paramedical staff under the Medical Education Department who intend to avail leave without allowance (LWA) for private employment. The applicant clarified that the fee was imposed solely as a regulatory measure intended to discourage indiscriminate availing of such leave, which could detrimentally impact public healthcare delivery. It was further explained that the fee did not involve any element of supply of goods or services, nor was it collected in the course or furtherance of any business activity. The matter was accordingly placed before the AAR, Kerala. 

 

High Court Held

The AAR Kerala held that the Directorate is not engaged in any commercial activity in levying the fee, and there exists no contractual obligation on the part of the applicant to tolerate the act of availing leave. The payment made by the employee does not constitute consideration for any service rendered. The fee is collected as an internal administrative measure and does not involve any supply within the meaning of Section 7 of the CGST Act or the Kerala GST Act. Accordingly, it was held that the fee collected does not qualify as a taxable supply, and therefore, no GST is applicable. 

List of Cases Cited

Care College of Nursing v. Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences 2024 (86) G.S.T.L. 244/(2023) 12 Centax 216 (Telangana) — Referred [Para 7.2.6]
Manappuram Finance Ltd. v. Asstt. Commissioner of Central Tax and Excise 2023 (69) G.S.T.L. 141/(2022) 1 Centax 120 (Ker.) — Referred [Para 7.1.8]

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
Govt Notifies Amendment to Customs & Excise Settlement Rules 2025

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

August 2, 2025

No GST on Transfer of Leasehold Rights by GIDC Allottee | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

August 2, 2025

Bail Granted to Foreign National Held by Customs for Drug Smuggling

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

August 2, 2025

HC Directs Petitioner to Seek Tariff Classification via Representation

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

August 2, 2025

HC Orders Release of Seized Goods on Bond & Bank Guarantee

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

July 31, 2025

Paper Wallets for Gloves Classified Under CTH 4823 | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

July 31, 2025

SCN Waiver via Pre-Printed Form Invalid for Confiscation | Delhi HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

July 30, 2025

Notional Interest on Deposit Not Taxable | CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

July 30, 2025

CESTAT Remands Classification Dispute of ‘Low Noise Blocker’ for Fresh Review

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

July 29, 2025

Govt. of J&K is liable to pay GST on hotel accommodation for its security forces to hoteliers: HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

July 29, 2025