No GST on LWA Fee for Private Jobs | AAR Kerala

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

GST on LWA fee AAR Kerala ruling Leave without allowance GST Directorate of Medical Education GST exemption Non-supply under GST
Case Details : Directorate of Medical Education (2025) 32 Centax 326 (A.A.R. - GST - Ker.) 

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • S/Shri Jomy Jacob IRS and Mansur M.I., Members
  •  Shri S.R. Rajesh, Authorized Representative. for the Applicant.

Facts of the Case

The applicant, the Directorate of Medical Education, submitted an application to the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) seeking clarification regarding the applicability of GST on the fees collected from medical officers, nursing staff, and paramedical staff under the Medical Education Department who intend to avail leave without allowance (LWA) for private employment. The applicant clarified that the fee was imposed solely as a regulatory measure intended to discourage indiscriminate availing of such leave, which could detrimentally impact public healthcare delivery. It was further explained that the fee did not involve any element of supply of goods or services, nor was it collected in the course or furtherance of any business activity. The matter was accordingly placed before the AAR, Kerala. 

 

High Court Held

The AAR Kerala held that the Directorate is not engaged in any commercial activity in levying the fee, and there exists no contractual obligation on the part of the applicant to tolerate the act of availing leave. The payment made by the employee does not constitute consideration for any service rendered. The fee is collected as an internal administrative measure and does not involve any supply within the meaning of Section 7 of the CGST Act or the Kerala GST Act. Accordingly, it was held that the fee collected does not qualify as a taxable supply, and therefore, no GST is applicable. 

List of Cases Cited

Care College of Nursing v. Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences 2024 (86) G.S.T.L. 244/(2023) 12 Centax 216 (Telangana) — Referred [Para 7.2.6]
Manappuram Finance Ltd. v. Asstt. Commissioner of Central Tax and Excise 2023 (69) G.S.T.L. 141/(2022) 1 Centax 120 (Ker.) — Referred [Para 7.1.8]

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
CBIC Issues Guidelines for Revision of Customs Entries Post-Clearance u/s 18A

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

November 3, 2025

Govt. Empowers Officers Under Customs Voluntary Revision Rules 2025

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

November 1, 2025

Govt. Revises Anti-Dumping Duty on Imports of Untreated Fumed Silica from China and Korea

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

October 29, 2025

CBIC Consolidates Customs Exemption Notifications Into Single Framework

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

October 28, 2025

CBIC Aligns Customs Exemption Notifications With Consolidated Framework

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

October 27, 2025

Order Set Aside as Successor Officer Passed Order Without Hearing | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

October 24, 2025

Telephonic Recall of Cleared Goods Without SCN Is Unlawful | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

October 18, 2025

SC Clears Vantara of Animal Smuggling and Laundering Allegations

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

October 16, 2025

CBIC Launches Online LOC Portal with Designation-based Logins

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

October 15, 2025

Government Revises Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold & Silver

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

October 14, 2025