No GST on LWA Fee for Private Jobs | AAR Kerala

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

GST on LWA fee AAR Kerala ruling Leave without allowance GST Directorate of Medical Education GST exemption Non-supply under GST
Case Details : Directorate of Medical Education (2025) 32 Centax 326 (A.A.R. - GST - Ker.) 

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • S/Shri Jomy Jacob IRS and Mansur M.I., Members
  •  Shri S.R. Rajesh, Authorized Representative. for the Applicant.

Facts of the Case

The applicant, the Directorate of Medical Education, submitted an application to the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) seeking clarification regarding the applicability of GST on the fees collected from medical officers, nursing staff, and paramedical staff under the Medical Education Department who intend to avail leave without allowance (LWA) for private employment. The applicant clarified that the fee was imposed solely as a regulatory measure intended to discourage indiscriminate availing of such leave, which could detrimentally impact public healthcare delivery. It was further explained that the fee did not involve any element of supply of goods or services, nor was it collected in the course or furtherance of any business activity. The matter was accordingly placed before the AAR, Kerala. 

 

High Court Held

The AAR Kerala held that the Directorate is not engaged in any commercial activity in levying the fee, and there exists no contractual obligation on the part of the applicant to tolerate the act of availing leave. The payment made by the employee does not constitute consideration for any service rendered. The fee is collected as an internal administrative measure and does not involve any supply within the meaning of Section 7 of the CGST Act or the Kerala GST Act. Accordingly, it was held that the fee collected does not qualify as a taxable supply, and therefore, no GST is applicable. 

List of Cases Cited

Care College of Nursing v. Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences 2024 (86) G.S.T.L. 244/(2023) 12 Centax 216 (Telangana) — Referred [Para 7.2.6]
Manappuram Finance Ltd. v. Asstt. Commissioner of Central Tax and Excise 2023 (69) G.S.T.L. 141/(2022) 1 Centax 120 (Ker.) — Referred [Para 7.1.8]

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
Customs Finalisation of Provisional Assessment Regulations 2025 – CBIC Notification 55/2025

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

September 16, 2025

HC Backs Preferential Treatment For Startups And MSMEs

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

September 15, 2025

HC Orders Release Of Detained Personal Gold Jewellery

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

September 15, 2025

Provisional Release of Seized Roasted Areca Nuts Allowed | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

September 12, 2025

Battery Operated AMR Water Meters Classifiable Under 9026 10 10 | SC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

September 12, 2025

Polyester Bed Sheets Classified Under Heading 6304: CESTAT

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

September 10, 2025

Appeal Maintainable in HC if Issue is Breach of Duty Exemption Condition | SC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

September 9, 2025

Gold Bars to Be Released to Bank on Provisional Basis | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

September 8, 2025

Metal-Core PCBs Classifiable as Printed Circuits Under CTH 8534 | SC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

September 6, 2025

Duty Liability Based on Original Bill of Entry Despite New Buyer | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

September 5, 2025