Customs Directed to Refrain From Repeatedly Resorting to Coercive Measures During Investigation

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

Customs exemption
Case Details: Advantek Fuel Systems Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) (2025) 27 Centax 326 (Del.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Prathiba M. Singh & Dharmesh Sharma, JJ.
  • Ms Anjali Jha Manish, S/Shri Priyadarshi Manish, Shreyansh Kushwaha, Jatin Kumar Gaur, Paras Aneja & Aman Ahluwalia, Advs., for the Petitioner.
  • S/Shri Aditya Singla, SSC, Rahul Jain, Ritwik Saha & Umang Mishra, Advs., for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The assessee, engaged in the development of CNG/LPG conversion systems, imported specific CNG kit components in 2017 and availed of the exemption under Notification No. 50/2017-Customs, dated 30-06-2017. Subsequently, this exemption was rescinded on 31st March 2022 through Notification No. 2/2022-Customs dated 01-02-2022. Initially, the Customs Department did not object to the exemption claim. However, an investigation was later initiated to reassess the validity of the exemption. The petitioner was informed that the investigation had been closed, but a summons was issued a year later, contradicting the prior closure notice and indicating the continuation of the inquiry. During the investigation, the petitioner and its directors were alleged to be non-cooperative, prompting the Department to provisionally attach the petitioner’s bank accounts. The petitioner challenged this action by filing a writ petition before the Delhi High Court.

High Court Held

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court held that the Customs Department must assess whether sufficient grounds exist to justify the withdrawal of the exemption under Notification No. 50/2017-Customs dated 30th June 2017. If such grounds are found, a show cause notice must be issued within three months. The Court further ruled that coercive measures, including repeated summonses and the freezing of bank accounts, must not be undertaken without proceeding with adjudication. Recognizing the adverse impact on business continuity, the Court directed the immediate unfreezing of the petitioner’s bank accounts while allowing an ad hoc deposit of Rs. 3 crores under protest.

List of Notifications Cited

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories
SC Upholds Customs Exemption on Imported Arms for Shooting Events

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

November 5, 2025

CBIC Designates Authorised Officer for Food Imports at Kannur Airport

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

November 5, 2025

CBIC Issues Guidelines for Revision of Customs Entries Post-Clearance u/s 18A

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

November 3, 2025

Govt. Empowers Officers Under Customs Voluntary Revision Rules 2025

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

November 1, 2025

Govt. Revises Anti-Dumping Duty on Imports of Untreated Fumed Silica from China and Korea

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

October 29, 2025

CBIC Consolidates Customs Exemption Notifications Into Single Framework

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

October 28, 2025

CBIC Aligns Customs Exemption Notifications With Consolidated Framework

Customs • News • Statutory Scope

October 27, 2025

Order Set Aside as Successor Officer Passed Order Without Hearing | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

October 24, 2025

Telephonic Recall of Cleared Goods Without SCN Is Unlawful | HC

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

October 18, 2025

SC Clears Vantara of Animal Smuggling and Laundering Allegations

Customs • News • Case Chronicles

October 16, 2025